The Nonconscious Nature of Power: Cues and Consequences

Power – asymmetric control over valued resources – is a fundamental dimension of social relations. Classical conceptualizations of power emphasize its conscious nature. In this review, we reveal how power often operates nonconsciously and identify the different methods and paradigms used to activate or create a psychological sense of power outside of conscious awareness. First, we establish that cues of power are often attended to nonconsciously, which explains why people can be so accurate at determining their own and others’ level of power yet so inaccurate at identifying the specific cues diagnostic of possessing power. Second, we discuss how people are often unaware of how the possession of power fundamentally alters basic psychological and behavioral tendencies and describe the range of methodologies – roles, cues, episodic recall, conceptual priming – used to identify the nonconscious effects of power. Power produces two broad types of effects: It increases abstraction in thought and approach in behavior, both of which make individuals more focused on their own goals and internal states. Like other psychological constructs and processes, even ones that are inherently social and relational, power’s cues and consequences do not have to be conscious for its profound influence on basic psychological and interpersonal processes to emerge. We discuss the implications of the nonconscious nature of power for limiting the corrupting, dark side often revealed among the powerful.

[1]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Pattern of Visual Dominance Behavior in Humans , 1985 .

[2]  D. Wegner,et al.  Apparent mental causation. Sources of the experience of will. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[3]  Joe C Magee,et al.  Power and the objectification of social targets. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Phoebe C. Ellsworth,et al.  Sentimental Stereotypes: Emotional Expectations for High-and Low-Status Group Members , 2000 .

[5]  Dacher Keltner,et al.  Social power and emotional experience: Actor and partner effects within dyadic interactions , 2008 .

[6]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Predicting the near and distant future. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Power Posing , 2010, Psychological science.

[8]  J. Rodin,et al.  Control and Efficacy as Interdisciplinary Bridges , 1999 .

[9]  A. Galinsky,et al.  Power Increases Hypocrisy , 2010, Psychological science.

[10]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[11]  Thomas W. Schubert,et al.  Control over the AssoCiAtion of Power And size , 2009 .

[12]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Unconscious Influences of Memory for a Prior Event , 1987 .

[13]  Bernadette Park,et al.  Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders’ social attention☆ , 2006 .

[14]  Lee,et al.  When the Going Gets Tough, Do the Tough Ask for Help? Help Seeking and Power Motivation in Organizations. , 1997, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[15]  Bernadette Park,et al.  When power does not corrupt: superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Thomas W. Schubert Your highness: vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  J. Bargh The automaticity of everyday life. , 1997 .

[18]  Y. Trope,et al.  The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. , 1998 .

[19]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: power priming and abstract information processing. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  J. Bargh The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. , 1994 .

[21]  Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. , 2002 .

[22]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[23]  T. Judge,et al.  The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: preliminary test of a theoretical model. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  An illusion of memory: false recognition influenced by unconscious perception , 1989 .

[25]  Katie A. Liljenquist,et al.  Power reduces the press of the situation: implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Daniël H. J. Wigboldus,et al.  Abstract thinking increases one's sense of power , 2008 .

[27]  D. Kipnis,et al.  Does power corrupt? , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  A. Guinote IN TOUCH WITH YOUR FEELINGS: POWER INCREASES RELIANCE ON BODILY INFORMATION , 2010 .

[29]  I. Firestone,et al.  Dyad dominance composition effects, nonverbal behaviors, and influence , 1990 .

[30]  Paul V. Martorana,et al.  From System Justification to System Condemnation: Antecedents of Attempts to Change Power Hierarchies , 2005 .

[31]  Jennifer S. Beer,et al.  Knowing your place: self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. , 2000 .

[33]  Ana Guinote,et al.  Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility , 2007 .

[34]  G. Clore,et al.  Cognitive feelings and metacognitive judgments , 1994 .

[35]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status , 2008 .

[36]  Richard E Petty,et al.  The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: a self-validation analysis. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  J. Bargh,et al.  The Automaticity of Social Life , 2006, Current directions in psychological science.

[38]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[39]  C. Carver,et al.  Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales , 1994 .

[40]  A. Galinsky,et al.  Lacking Power Impairs Executive Functions , 2008, Psychological science.

[41]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Illegitimacy Moderates the Effects of Power on Approach , 2008, Psychological science.

[42]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  Category accessibility and impression formation , 1977 .

[43]  Joe C Magee,et al.  From power to action. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  Michael W. Kraus,et al.  A Reciprocal Influence Model of Social Power: Emerging Principles and Lines of Inquiry , 2008 .

[45]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: a meta-analysis. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  R. Engle Working Memory Capacity as Executive Attention , 2002 .

[48]  C Anderson,et al.  Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  E. Higgins,et al.  Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[50]  D. Bugental,et al.  The Paradoxical Misuse of Power by Those Who See Themselves as Powerless: How Does It Happen? , 1999 .

[51]  C. Anderson,et al.  Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  John A Bargh,et al.  NONCONSCIOUS EFFECTS OF POWER ON BASIC APPROACH AND AVOIDANCE TENDENCIES. , 2008, Social cognition.

[53]  H. Aarts,et al.  The silence of the library: environment, situational norm, and social behavior. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  Ana Guinote,et al.  When subjective experiences matter: power increases reliance on the ease of retrieval. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  Nick Haslam,et al.  Relational Models Theory : A Contemporary Overview , 2004 .

[56]  P Raymond,et al.  Attractiveness of the underling: an automatic power --> sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[57]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  Desire to Acquire: Powerlessness and Compensatory Consumption , 2008 .

[58]  Thomas W. Schubert,et al.  High in the Hierarchy: How Vertical Location and Judgments of Leaders' Power are Interrelated , 2007 .

[59]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Illusory Control , 2008, Psychological science.

[60]  D. Bugental,et al.  Who's the boss? Differential accessibility of dominance ideation in parent–child relationships. , 1997 .

[61]  M. J. Harris,et al.  The Balance of Power: Interpersonal Consequences of Differential Power and Expectancies , 2000 .

[62]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  Knowing Who's Boss: fMRI and ERP Investigations of Social Dominance Perception , 2008, Group processes & intergroup relations : GPIR.

[63]  L. Tiedens,et al.  Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: the effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[64]  S. Fiske,et al.  Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyping. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[65]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  Power, Approach, and Inhibition , 2003 .

[66]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[67]  Nalini Ambady,et al.  Effects of situational power on automatic racial prejudice , 2001 .

[68]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Power Differences 1 Running head : POWER DIFFERENCES IN THE CONSTRUAL OF A CRISIS Power Differences in the Construal of a Crisis : The Immediate Aftermath of September 11 , 2001 , 2001 .

[69]  Joe C Magee,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Power and Perspectives Not Taken , 2022 .

[70]  Ana Guinote,et al.  Power and Goal Pursuit , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[71]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[72]  Y. Trope,et al.  15. Psychological distance , 2007 .

[73]  J. Jost,et al.  Legitimacy Crisis? Behavioral Approach and Inhibition When Power Differences are Left Unexplained , 2008 .

[74]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  The experience of power: examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[75]  J. Bargh,et al.  Attitudes and Social Cognition Relationship Orientation as a Moderator of the Effects of Social Power , 2022 .

[76]  B. Wojciszke,et al.  POWER INFLUENCES SELF-ESTEEM , 2007 .

[77]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[78]  L. Tiedens,et al.  Power moves: complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[79]  S. Gosling,et al.  Punishing Hubris: The Perils of Overestimating One's Status in a Group , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[80]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Power, Propensity to Negotiate, and Moving First in Competitive Interactions , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[81]  E. Skinner A guide to constructs of control. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[82]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[83]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.324 Power, optimism, and risk-taking , 2022 .

[84]  R. Bourhis,et al.  Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations , 1991 .

[85]  Joe C. Magee Seeing power in action: The roles of deliberation, implementation, and action in inferences of power , 2009 .

[86]  A. Fiske The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations. , 1992, Psychological review.

[87]  J. Copeland,et al.  Prophecies of power: Motivational implications of social power for behavioral confirmation. , 1994 .

[88]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Who Is the Boss and Who Is Not? Accuracy of Judging Status , 2004 .

[89]  Nalini Ambady,et al.  The Glimpsed World: Unintended Communication and Unintended Perception , 2005 .

[90]  John A. Bargh,et al.  The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption. , 2001 .

[91]  D. Winter The power motive. , 1974 .

[92]  Johan C. Karremans,et al.  Having the Power to Forgive: When the Experience of Power Increases Interpersonal Forgiveness , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[93]  L. Tiedens,et al.  The fluency of social hierarchy: the ease with which hierarchical relationships are seen, remembered, learned, and liked. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[94]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion , 2006 .

[95]  E. Zurbriggen,et al.  Social motives and cognitive power-sex associations: predictors of aggressive sexual behavior. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[96]  Stanley Schachter,et al.  Obesity and Eating , 1968 .

[97]  John Madden,et al.  Neurobiology of learning, emotion, and affect , 1991 .

[98]  Alan Page Fiske,et al.  Four Modes of Constituting Relationships: Consubstantial Assimilation; Space, Magnitude, Time, and Force; Concrete Procedures; Abstract Symbolism. , 2004 .

[99]  C. Keating,et al.  The relationship of social power to visual displays of dominance between men and women. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[100]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Power Differences in the Construal of a Crisis: The Immediate Aftermath of September 11, 2001 , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[101]  S. Fiske,et al.  Power Can Bias Impression Processes: Stereotyping Subordinates by Default and by Design , 2000 .