Improved finite-source inversion through joint measurements of rotational and translational ground motions: a numerical study

Abstract. With the prospects of seismic equipment being able to measure rotational ground motions in a wide frequency and amplitude range in the near future, we engage in the question of how this type of ground motion observation can be used to solve the seismic source inverse problem. In this paper, we focus on the question of whether finite-source inversion can benefit from additional observations of rotational motion. Keeping the overall number of traces constant, we compare observations from a surface seismic network with 44 three-component translational sensors (classic seismometers) with those obtained with 22 six-component sensors (with additional three-component rotational motions). Synthetic seismograms are calculated for known finite-source properties. The corresponding inverse problem is posed in a probabilistic way using the Shannon information content to measure how the observations constrain the seismic source properties. We minimize the influence of the source receiver geometry around the fault by statistically analyzing six-component inversions with a random distribution of receivers. Since our previous results are achieved with a regular spacing of the receivers, we try to answer the question of whether the results are dependent on the spatial distribution of the receivers. The results show that with the six-component subnetworks, kinematic source inversions for source properties (such as rupture velocity, rise time, and slip amplitudes) are not only equally successful (even that would be beneficial because of the substantially reduced logistics installing half the sensors) but also statistically inversions for some source properties are almost always improved. This can be attributed to the fact that the (in particular vertical) gradient information is contained in the additional motion components. We compare these effects for strike-slip and normal-faulting type sources and confirm that the increase in inversion quality for kinematic source parameters is even higher for the normal fault. This indicates that the inversion benefits from the additional information provided by the horizontal rotation rates, i.e., information about the vertical displacement gradient.

[1]  Stephen H. Hartzell,et al.  Slip distribution of the 19 September 1985 Michoacan, Mexico, earthquake: near-source and teleseismic constraints , 1989 .

[2]  Minoru Takeo,et al.  What can be learned from rotational motions excited by earthquakes , 1997 .

[3]  Michel Campillo,et al.  Frequency domain inversion of strong motions: Application to the 1992 Landers earthquake , 1995 .

[4]  H. Graf,et al.  Polar vortex controls coupling of North Atlantic Ocean and atmosphere , 2005 .

[5]  Asher Flaws,et al.  Broad-band observations of earthquake-induced rotational ground motions , 2007 .

[6]  L. M. Baker,et al.  Transient stresses at Parkfield, California, produced by the M 7.4 Landers earthquake of June 28, 1992: Observations from the UPSAR dense seismograph array , 1995 .

[7]  P. M. Mai,et al.  Bayesian imaging of the 2000 Western Tottori (Japan) earthquake through fitting of strong motion and GPS data , 2009 .

[8]  Mihailo D. Trifunac Earthquake Engineering, Non-linear Problems in , 2009, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[9]  E. Tinti,et al.  Dependence of slip weakening distance (Dc) on final slip during dynamic rupture of earthquakes , 2009 .

[10]  Heiner Igel,et al.  Rotational sensors—a comparison of different sensor types , 2012, Journal of Seismology.

[11]  W. K. Hastings,et al.  Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications , 1970 .

[12]  Simon C. Stähler,et al.  AxiSEM: broadband 3-D seismic wavefields in axisymmetric media , 2014 .

[13]  Simon C. Stähler,et al.  Instaseis: instant global seismograms based on a broadband waveform database , 2015 .

[14]  P. M. Mai,et al.  Bayesian inference of kinematic earthquake rupture parameters through fitting of strong motion data , 2008 .

[15]  Minoru Takeo,et al.  Ground rotational motions recorded in near‐source region of earthquakes , 1998 .

[16]  Albert Tarantola,et al.  Inverse problem theory - and methods for model parameter estimation , 2004 .

[17]  Wiwit Suryanto,et al.  Rotational Motions in Seismology , 2006 .

[18]  Jiří Málek,et al.  Six-degree-of-freedom near-source seismic motions II: examples of real seismogram analysis and S-wave velocity retrieval , 2015, Journal of Seismology.

[19]  Andreas Fichtner,et al.  Sensitivity Densities for Rotational Ground-Motion Measurements , 2009 .

[20]  F. Cotton,et al.  Fault location and source process of the Boumerdes, Algeria, earthquake inferred from geodetic and strong motion data , 2005 .

[21]  Andreas Fichtner,et al.  Reducing nonuniqueness in finite source inversion using rotational ground motions , 2014 .

[22]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Modification of Empirical Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relations to Include the Amplitude and Duration Effects of Rupture Directivity , 1997 .

[23]  A. Fichtner,et al.  Insights into the kinematics of a volcanic caldera drop: Probabilistic finite-source inversion of the 1996 Bárdarbunga, Iceland, earthquake , 2010 .

[24]  Niels Bohr,et al.  Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems , 2004 .

[25]  Jon-Paul R. Wells,et al.  On the application of fiber optic gyroscopes for detection of seismic rotations , 2012, Journal of Seismology.

[26]  E. R. Engdahl,et al.  Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from traveltimes , 1995 .

[27]  T. Klügel,et al.  The Large Ring Laser G for Continuous Earth Rotation Monitoring , 2009 .

[28]  A. Morelli Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems , 2010 .

[29]  F. Cotton,et al.  Frequency Domain Inversion of Strong Motions: Application to the Blind Test for Kinematic Source Inversion (EC-project SPICE) , 2007 .

[30]  R. DeSalvo Review: accelerometer development for use in gravitational wave-detection interferometers , 2009 .

[31]  Robert L. Nigbor,et al.  Six-degree-of-freedom ground-motion measurement , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[32]  Jiří Málek,et al.  Rotaphone, a Self‐Calibrated Six‐Degree‐of‐Freedom Seismic Sensor and Its Strong‐Motion Records , 2013 .

[33]  B. Souter,et al.  The effect of block rotations on the global seismic moment tensor and the patterns of seismic P and T axes , 1993 .

[34]  D. B. DeBra,et al.  Review: Requirements for a Ground Rotation Sensor to Improve Advanced LIGO , 2009 .