olf413 Gene Controls Taste Recognition, Preference and Feeding Activity in Drosophila melanogaster

Recognition and responsiveness to food taste becomes a crucial event in foraging and feeding behaviour of an organism. Adjusting the feeding behaviour through a sophisticated and robust taste system is critical to fulfil their nutritional needs and facilitate its survival in environment. Palatability of food sources depends on the sensory and motor cues provided by the brain, in co-ordination with the other body systems to enable decisive feeding. Drosophila melanogaster is an apt model organism to decipher these behavioural paradigms. Octopamine a neurotransmitter, is required in regulation of feeding behavioural responses. olf413, a paralogue of T\(\beta\)H, is a gene predicted for its involvement in octopamine biosynthesis. The biological function of this gene is yet to be unravelled. Here we propose this gene function in taste recognition, food preference and feeding activity. We test the olf413 loss of function mutants for food preference between two fruit extracts using CAFE and horizontal box methods. In our study we have used olf413 gene disruption strain, olf413MI02014 homozygous and in transheterozygous condition with another allele isolated in our lab, olf413SG1.1. The results show that olf413 mutants display a severe phenotype in feeding behaviour and there is an allele specific phenotypic distinction between the two strains. Thus implying that olf413 gene function is required for taste recognition, starvation driven initiation and execution of feeding behaviour of the flies.

[1]  Silvio C. E. Tosatto,et al.  InterPro in 2022 , 2022, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  Jean-Yves Roignant,et al.  Tyramine action on motoneuron excitability and adaptable tyramine/octopamine ratios adjust Drosophila locomotion to nutritional state , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Kristin Scott,et al.  A subset of octopaminergic neurons that promotes feeding initiation in Drosophila melanogaster , 2018, PloS one.

[4]  N. Perrimon,et al.  A gene-specific T2A-GAL4 library for Drosophila , 2018, eLife.

[5]  B. Brembs,et al.  Octopamine and Tyramine Contribute Separately to the Counter-Regulatory Response to Sugar Deficit in Drosophila , 2018, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[6]  G. Boulianne,et al.  Drosophila mutants lacking octopamine exhibit impairment in aversive olfactory associative learning , 2017, The European journal of neuroscience.

[7]  H. Scholz,et al.  The CApillary FEeder Assay Measures Food Intake in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2017, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[8]  H. Scholz,et al.  Octopamine indirectly affects proboscis extension response habituation in Drosophila melanogaster by controlling sucrose responsiveness. , 2014, Journal of insect physiology.

[9]  Suzanna Lewis,et al.  Phylogenetic-based propagation of functional annotations within the Gene Ontology consortium , 2011, Briefings Bioinform..

[10]  Bonnie Berger,et al.  An integrative approach to ortholog prediction for disease-focused and other functional studies , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[11]  Stephen M. Mount,et al.  The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. , 2000, Science.

[12]  J. David,et al.  Octopamine in invertebrates and vertebrates. A review , 1985, Progress in Neurobiology.

[13]  J. Jaenike Induction of host preference in Drosophila melanogaster , 1983, Oecologia.

[14]  M. Livingstone,et al.  Genetic dissection of monoamine neurotransmitter synthesis in Drosophila , 1983, Nature.

[15]  T. Dobzhansky,et al.  Local and seasonal variations in relative frequencies of species of Drosophila in Brazil , 1950 .

[16]  D. Soll,et al.  Coordination and Modulation of Locomotion Pattern Generators in Drosophila Larvae: Effects of Altered Biogenic Amine Levels by the Tyramine β Hydroxlyase Mutation , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  G. A. Kerkut,et al.  Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry, and pharmacology , 1985 .