The ignoring paradox: Cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items

Observers find a target item more quickly when they have foreknowledge of target-defining attributes, such as identity, color, or location. However, it is less clear whether foreknowledge of nontarget attributes can also speed search. Munneke, Van der Stigchel, and Theeuwes Acta Psychologica 129:101–107, (2008) found that observers found the target more quickly when they were cued to ignore a region of space where a target would not appear. Using a similar paradigm, we explored the effects of cueing nontarget features on search. We found that when we cued observers to ignore nontarget features, search was slowed. The results from a probe-dot detection task revealed that this slowing occurred because, paradoxically, observers initially selected an item appearing in the to-be-ignored color. Finally, we found that cueing nontarget features sped search when placeholders matching the location of the to-be-ignored color preceded presentation of the search display by at least 800 ms; thus, it appears that some limited inhibition of to-be-ignored items occurs following selection. Taken together, these results suggest that observers are unable to explicitly avoid selection of items matching known nontarget features. Instead, when nontarget features are cued, observers select the to-be-ignored feature or the locations of objects matching that feature early in search, and only inhibit them after this selection process.

[1]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Fractionating the preview benefit in search: dual-task decomposition of visual marking by timing and modality. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  D. Wegner Ironic processes of mental control. , 1994, Psychological review.

[3]  H Pashler,et al.  Do images involuntarily trigger search? A test of Pillsbury’s hypothesis , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  Competition in visual working memory for control of search , 2003 .

[5]  John Hodsoll,et al.  Effects of colour on preview search: anticipatory and inhibitory biases for colour. , 2004, Spatial vision.

[6]  H. Egeth,et al.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  G. Humphreys,et al.  An analysis of the time course of attention in preview search , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Cueing the location of a distractor: an inhibitory mechanism of spatial attention? , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[9]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  Do the contents of working memory capture attention? Yes, but cognitive control matters. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  S. Yantis,et al.  Preparatory activity in visual cortex indexes distractor suppression during covert spatial orienting. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  J. Duncan,et al.  Directing attention in the visual field , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  D. Burr,et al.  Functional implications of cross-orientation inhibition of cortical visual cells. I. Neurophysiological evidence , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[13]  Satoru Suzuki,et al.  Understanding priming of color-singleton search: Roles of attention at encoding and “retrieval” , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Filtering items of mass distraction: Top-down biases against distractors are necessary for the feature-based carry-over to occur , 2007, Vision Research.

[15]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  An ERP study of preparatory and inhibitory mechanisms in a cued saccade task , 2006, Brain Research.

[17]  H. Müller,et al.  Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  K. Cave,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  John Hodsoll,et al.  Color grouping in space and time: evidence from negative color-based carryover effects in preview search. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  P. Downing,et al.  Interactions Between Visual Working Memory and Selective Attention , 2000, Psychological science.

[22]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Automatic guidance of attention from working memory , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  Veit Stuphorn,et al.  Trial-by-trial adjustments of top-down set modulate oculomotor capture , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Alejandro Lleras,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of feature-based inhibition of focused attention across consecutive trials. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[27]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[28]  B. Green,et al.  Color coding in a visual search task. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[29]  K. Cave,et al.  Spatial Attention in Visual Search for Features and Feature Conjunctions , 1995 .

[30]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Visual marking: using time in visual selection , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[32]  S. Luck,et al.  Feature-based attention modulates feedforward visual processing , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  Y. Tsal,et al.  The attentional white bear phenomenon: the mandatory allocation of attention to expected distractor locations. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  Hsuan-Fu Chao Top-down attentional control for distractor locations: the benefit of precuing distractor locations on target localization and discrimination. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Second-order parallel processing: visual search for the odd item in a subset. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Christian N L Olivers,et al.  What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  E. Fox Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  Fred A. Masterson,et al.  Pattern redundancy and detection in very short-term memory , 1972 .

[40]  F. C. Volkmann,et al.  Time course of visual inhibition during voluntary saccades. , 1968, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[41]  Alejandro Lleras,et al.  Intertrial inhibition of focused attention in pop-out search , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. , 1997, Psychological review.

[43]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[44]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: Evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination , 1994 .

[46]  Brian A. Goolsby,et al.  Adaptive modulation of color salience contingent upon global form coding and task relevance , 2005, Vision Research.

[47]  G. Woodman,et al.  Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective Attention and Priming: Inhibitory and Facilitatory Effects of Ignored Primes , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[49]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[50]  P Jolicoeur,et al.  The linear separability effect in color visual search: Ruling out the additive color hypothesis , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  J Theeuwes,et al.  Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Attention and performance X : control of language processes , 1986 .

[53]  Jon Driver,et al.  Attentional Preparation for a Lateralized Visual Distractor: Behavioral and fMRI Evidence , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.