Increasing effectiveness of the science-policy interface in the socioecological arena in Brazil
暂无分享,去创建一个
Mercedes Bustamante | Carlos A. Joly | M. Bustamante | J. Metzger | J. Ometto | C. Joly | C. Seixas | A. Pires | F. Scarano | J. Farinaci | Cristiana S. Seixas | Fabio R. Scarano | Maíra C.G. Padgurschi | Aliny P.F. Pires | Paula F.D. Castro | Juliana S. Farinaci | Jean P. Metzger | Jean P. Ometto | Maíra Padgurschi | P. F. D. Castro
[1] P. Archambault,et al. Our House Is Burning: Discrepancy in Climate Change vs. Biodiversity Coverage in the Media as Compared to Scientific Literature , 2018, Front. Ecol. Evol..
[2] R. Pardini,et al. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science–practice gap in ecology and conservation , 2018, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[3] N. Nakicenovic,et al. Summary for policymakers , 1963 .
[4] L. Gallagher,et al. Wrestling with the complexity of evaluation for organizations at the boundary of science, policy, and practice , 2018, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[5] Matthias Bergmann,et al. Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization , 2012 .
[6] Nathan L. Engle,et al. What influences climate information use in water management? The role of boundary organizations and governance regimes in Brazil and the U.S. , 2013 .
[7] S. Beck,et al. The IPCC and the new map of science and politics , 2018, WIREs Climate Change.
[8] Carl Folke,et al. Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—lessons learned for sustainability , 2017 .
[9] The IPCC Experience and Lessons for IPBES , 2016 .
[10] S. Hove,et al. Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: A critical assessment of trade-offs in science-policy interfaces , 2014 .
[11] Christine J. Kirchhoff,et al. Creating synergy with boundary chains: Can they improve usability of climate information? , 2015 .
[12] Jorge Soberón,et al. IPBES ≠ IPCC. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[13] F. Esteves,et al. Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil , 2017, Biodiversity and Conservation.
[14] Simo Sarkki,et al. Adding ‘iterativity’ to the credibility, relevance, legitimacy: A novel scheme to highlight dynamic aspects of science–policy interfaces , 2015 .
[15] R. K. Neumann,et al. Conceptualizing credibility, relevance and legitimacy for evaluating the effectiveness of science–policy interfaces: Challenges and opportunities , 2015 .
[16] Christine J. Kirchhoff,et al. Narrowing the gap between climate science and adaptation action: The role of boundary chains , 2015 .
[17] Sujatha Raman,et al. Science advice for global challenges: learning from trade-offs in the IPCC , 2018 .
[18] Christine J. Kirchhoff,et al. Narrowing the climate information usability gap , 2012 .
[19] Kong Luen Heong,et al. Science-policy interface: beyond assessments. , 2011, Science.
[20] D. Abessa,et al. The systematic dismantling of Brazilian environmental laws risks losses on all fronts , 2019, Nature Ecology & Evolution.
[21] C. Joly,et al. Biodiversity research still falls short of creating links with ecosystem services and human well-being in a global hotspot , 2018, Ecosystem Services.
[22] J. Barlow,et al. Navigating the Space between Research and Implementation in Conservation , 2017 .
[23] A. Troumbis. Declining Google Trends of public interest in biodiversity: semantics, statistics or traceability of changing priorities? , 2017, Biodiversity and Conservation.
[24] Ritesh Kumar,et al. Options for Governance and Decision-Making across Scales and Sectors , 2018 .
[25] M. Enserink,et al. Breakdowns of the year. , 2018, Science.
[26] Maria Carmen Lemos,et al. Usable climate knowledge for adaptive and co-managed water governance , 2015 .
[27] E. McNie. Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature , 2007 .
[28] K. Vohland,et al. Ensuring the success of IPBES: between interface, market place and parliament , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[29] Antonio M. Saraiva,et al. Relatório temático sobre polinização, polinizadores e produção de alimentos no Brasil , 2019 .
[30] Art Dewulf,et al. What does policy-relevant global environmental knowledge do? The cases of climate and biodiversity , 2016 .
[31] Richard B. Rood,et al. Moving Climate Information off the Shelf: Boundary Chains and the Role of RISAs as Adaptive Organizations , 2014 .
[32] Zuzana V. Harmáčková,et al. Welcoming different perspectives in IPBES: “Nature’s contributions to people” and “Ecosystem services” , 2018 .
[33] D. Jamieson,et al. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Challenges and Opportunities , 2017 .
[34] H. Escobar. Scientists, environmentalists brace for Brazil's right turn. , 2018, Science.
[35] A. Knight,et al. Science-policy interface: scientific input limited. , 2011, Science.
[36] Sarah Michaels,et al. Matching knowledge brokering strategies to environmental policy problems and settings , 2009 .
[37] Stanley T. Asah,et al. The IPBES Conceptual Framework - connecting nature and people , 2015 .
[38] The IPCC at a crossroads: Opportunities for reform , 2015, Science.
[39] E. Masood. The battle for the soul of biodiversity , 2018, Nature.
[40] C. Howarth,et al. Exploring the science–policy interface on climate change: The role of the IPCC in informing local decision-making in the UK , 2016, Palgrave Communications.
[41] Alexandra Lux,et al. Governance options for science–policy interfaces on biodiversity and ecosystem services: comparing a network versus a platform approach , 2016, Biodiversity and Conservation.
[42] Daniel G. Brown,et al. Boundary organizations to boundary chains: Prospects for advancing climate science application , 2015 .
[43] C. Joly,et al. Brief history of the Brazilian Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services/BPBES , 2017 .
[44] Rolf Lidskog,et al. Boundary organizations and environmental governance : Performance, institutional design, and conceptual development , 2017 .
[45] S. Polasky,et al. Assessing nature's contributions to people , 2018, Science.
[46] Simo Sarkki,et al. Science-policy interfaces for biodiversity: dynamic learning environments for successful impact , 2016, Biodiversity and Conservation.
[47] Lukas H. Meyer,et al. Summary for Policymakers , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.
[48] J. Penha,et al. Poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in Brazil , 2018, Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation.
[49] Barbara Gabriella Renzi,et al. Linguistic analysis of IPCC summaries for policymakers and associated coverage , 2016 .
[50] E. Archer,et al. The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Africa , 2018 .