Gender differences and the effects of perceived internet privacy on self-reports of sexual behavior and sociosexuality

The use of the Internet for conducting research has found that the level of anonymity intrinsic to web-based surveys is useful in deterring various participant biases. Though, concerns about Internet privacy could interfere with the effects of perceived anonymity and influence how a person responds. In this study, participants were asked to take an Internet survey and then were randomly assigned to conditions with varying degrees of implied privacy in which they answered questions about their desire for casual sex (sociosexuality) and their lifetime sexual partners. Only in the condition without any threat to the participant's anonymity was there no difference between men and women's reports of their sexual behavior. However, in every condition men reported having a significantly higher sociosexuality than women. Findings are consistent with both the biologic and gender-biased explanations in differences of self-report for sexual information. Implications for social constraints and Internet based research are discussed.

[1]  J. Catania.  A framework for conceptualizing reporting bias and its antecedents in interviews assessing human sexuality , 1999 .

[2]  T. J. Whelan,et al.  Antecedents of Anonymity Perceptions in Web-based Surveys , 2008 .

[3]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[4]  F. Kreuter,et al.  Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys The Effects of Mode and Question Sensitivity , 2008 .

[5]  R. LaRose,et al.  Privacy Issues in Internet Surveys , 1999 .

[6]  Mary Crawford,et al.  Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research , 2003, Journal of sex research.

[7]  S. Clark,et al.  Do men and women report their sexual partnerships differently? Evidence from Kisumu, Kenya. , 2011, International perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[8]  A. Eagly,et al.  Once again, the origins of sex differences. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[9]  Walter W. Hauck,et al.  Effects of Interviewer Gender, Interviewer Choice, and Item Wording on Responses to Questions Concerning Sexual Behavior , 1996 .

[10]  C. Paul,et al.  Consistency and Reliability of Self-reported Lifetime Number of Heterosexual Partners by Gender and Age in a Cohort Study , 2010, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[11]  P. Jonason,et al.  The Power of Prestige: Why Young Men Report Having more Sex Partners than Young Women , 2009 .

[12]  Michele G. Alexander,et al.  Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self‐reported sexuality , 2003, Journal of sex research.

[13]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Survey research and societal change. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  Daniel W. Smith,et al.  Effects of Context and Question Type on Endorsement of Childhood Sexual Abuse , 2003, Journal of traumatic stress.

[15]  J Fawcett,et al.  Using the Internet for data collection. An innovative electronic strategy. , 1995, Computers in nursing.

[16]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Comparing Oral Interviewing with Self-Administered Computerized QuestionnairesAn Experiment , 2010 .

[17]  Karsten Mueller,et al.  Effects of Personalized Versus Generic Implementation of an Intra-Organizational Online Survey on Psychological Anonymity and Response Behavior: A Field Experiment , 2014 .

[18]  A. Scriven,et al.  The application of online surveys for workplace health research , 2003, The journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health.

[19]  Adam N. Joinson,et al.  Measuring self-disclosure online: Blurring and non-response to sensitive items in web-based surveys , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Michael J. Marks,et al.  The Sexual Double Standard: Fact or Fiction? , 2005 .

[21]  T. W. Smith,et al.  Discrepancies between men and women in reporting number of sexual partners: a summary from four countries. , 1992, Social biology.

[22]  Hsiu-Mei Huang,et al.  Do print and Web surveys provide the same results? , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Tom W. Smith,et al.  Motivation to Report Sensitive Behaviors on Surveys: Evidence From a Bogus Pipeline Experiment1 , 1997 .

[24]  John Suler,et al.  The Online Disinhibition Effect , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[25]  Norman R. Brown,et al.  Estimating number of lifetime sexual partners: men and women do it differently. , 1999 .

[26]  Annie I. Antón,et al.  How internet users' privacy concerns have evolved since 2002 , 2010, IEEE Security & Privacy.

[27]  J. Santelli,et al.  Sexual behavior among U.S. high school students, 1990-1995. , 1998, Family planning perspectives.

[28]  Shelley J. Correll,et al.  Unpacking the Gender System , 2004 .

[29]  Youngme Moon.  Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers , 2000 .

[30]  Kerstin E. E. Schroder,et al.  Effects of Anonymity, Gender, and Erotophilia on the Quality of Data Obtained from Self-Reports of Socially Sensitive Behaviors , 2002, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[31]  J. Simpson,et al.  Individual differences in sociosexuality: evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  J. Simpson,et al.  Women's Preferences for Male Behavioral Displays Change Across the Menstrual Cycle , 2004, Psychological science.

[33]  Michael J. Marks,et al.  Common vs. Uncommon Sexual Acts: Evidence for the Sexual Double Standard , 2009 .

[34]  Kaye Wellings,et al.  Sexual lifestyles and HIV risk , 1992, Nature.

[35]  Adam Joinson,et al.  Social desirability, anonymity, and internet-based questionnaires , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[36]  J. Krosnick,et al.  National Surveys Via Rdd Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet Comparing Sample Representativeness and Response Quality , 2009 .

[37]  P. Jonason.  A Mediation Hypothesis to Account for the Sex Difference in Reported Number of Sexual Partners , 2008 .

[38]  J. Catania,et al.  Effects of Interview Mode on Assessments of Erectile and Ejaculatory Dysfunction among Men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) , 2013, Journal of sex research.

[39]  Michael W. Wiederman,et al.  The truth must be in here somewhere: Examining the gender discrepancy in self‐reported lifetime number of sex partners , 1997 .

[40]  D. Barlow,et al.  Self-reported frequency of sexual urges, fantasies, and masturbatory fantasies in heterosexual males and females , 1990, Archives of sexual behavior.

[41]  H. Eysenck.  Personality and sexual behaviour. , 1972, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[42]  Karolien Poels,et al.  Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  Stefan Stremersch,et al.  Analysis of sensitive questions across cultures: an application of multigroup item randomized response theory to sexual attitudes and behavior. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  J. Goedert,et al.  Sexual behaviour survey in a rural area of northwest Tanzania , 1994, AIDS.

[45]  Kerstin E. E. Schroder,et al.  Methodological challenges in research on sexual risk behavior: II. Accuracy of self-reports , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[46]  D. Buss,et al.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. , 1993, Psychological review.

[47]  J. Henrich,et al.  Most people are not WEIRD , 2010, Nature.

[48]  Joshua Fogel,et al.  Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[49]  Kathleen D. Vohs,et al.  Is There a Gender Difference in Strength of Sex Drive? Theoretical Views, Conceptual Distinctions, and a Review of Relevant Evidence , 2001 .

[50]  Jennifer S. Tucker,et al.  Selection in the Information Age: The Impact of Privacy Concerns and Computer Experience on Applicant Reactions , 2006 .

[51]  R. Tourangeau,et al.  Sensitive questions in surveys. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[52]  E. Herold,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Sexual Double Standard , 2002 .

[53]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[54]  Adam N. Joinson,et al.  Knowing Me, Knowing You: Reciprocal Self-Disclosure in Internet-Based Surveys , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[55]  E. Kane,et al.  INTERVIEWER GENDER AND GENDER ATTITUDES , 1993 .

[56]  B. Risman,et al.  A double standard for "Hooking Up": How far have we come toward gender equality? , 2013, Social science research.

[57]  P. Trapnell,et al.  Ethnicity, desirable responding, and self-reports of abuse: a comparison of European- and Asian-ancestry undergraduates. , 1999, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.