Investigation into local cell mechanics by atomic force microscopy mapping and optical tweezer vertical indentation

Investigating the mechanical properties of cells could reveal a potential source of label-free markers of cancer progression, based on measurable viscoelastic parameters. The Young's modulus has proved to be the most thoroughly studied so far, however, even for the same cell type, the elastic modulus reported in different studies spans a wide range of values, mainly due to the application of different experimental conditions. This complicates the reliable use of elasticity for the mechanical phenotyping of cells. Here we combine two complementary techniques, atomic force microscopy (AFM) and optical tweezer microscopy (OTM), providing a comprehensive mechanical comparison of three human breast cell lines: normal myoepithelial (HBL-100), luminal breast cancer (MCF-7) and basal breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) cells. The elastic modulus was measured locally by AFM and OTM on single cells, using similar indentation approaches but different measurement parameters. Peak force tapping AFM was employed at nanonewton forces and high loading rates to draw a viscoelastic map of each cell and the results indicated that the region on top of the nucleus provided the most meaningful results. OTM was employed at those locations at piconewton forces and low loading rates, to measure the elastic modulus in a real elastic regime and rule out the contribution of viscous forces typical of AFM. When measured by either AFM or OTM, the cell lines' elasticity trend was similar for the aggressive MDA-MB-231 cells, which were found to be significantly softer than the other two cell types in both measurements. However, when comparing HBL-100 and MCF-7 cells, we found significant differences only when using OTM.

[1]  Fumihiko Kajiya,et al.  The alteration of a mechanical property of bone cells during the process of changing from osteoblasts to osteocytes. , 2008, Bone.

[2]  Stefan Schinkinger,et al.  Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[3]  Masoud Agah,et al.  The effects of cancer progression on the viscoelasticity of ovarian cell cytoskeleton structures. , 2012, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[4]  M. Lekka,et al.  Cancer cell recognition--mechanical phenotype. , 2012, Micron.

[5]  J. Rao,et al.  Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[6]  J. Sethian,et al.  Multicellular Architecture of Malignant Breast Epithelia Influences Mechanics , 2014, PloS one.

[7]  Guo Hong-Lian,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Breast Cancer Cell Membrane Studied with Optical Tweezers , 2004 .

[8]  Daniel J Müller,et al.  Atomic force microscopy as a multifunctional molecular toolbox in nanobiotechnology. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[9]  Ueli Aebi,et al.  The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[10]  Kai Bodensiek,et al.  Cell Visco-Elasticity Measured with AFM and Optical Trapping at Sub-Micrometer Deformations , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  Roberto Cingolani,et al.  Cytomechanical and topological investigation of MCF-7 cells by scanning force microscopy , 2009, Nanotechnology.

[12]  M. Trendelenburg,et al.  Analysis of Cytoskeleton-Destabilizing Agents by Optimized Optical Navigation and AFM Force Measurements , 2010, Microscopy Today.

[13]  Richard S. Chadwick,et al.  Determination of the elastic moduli of thin samples and adherent cells using conical AFM tips , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[14]  Dino Di Carlo,et al.  A mechanical biomarker of cell state in medicine. , 2012 .

[15]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Microrheology of human lung epithelial cells measured by atomic force microscopy. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Dan Cojoc,et al.  Custom-Built Optical Tweezers for Locally Probing the Viscoelastic Properties of Cancer Cells , 2011 .

[17]  C. Lim,et al.  Biomechanics approaches to studying human diseases. , 2007, Trends in biotechnology.

[18]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.

[19]  J. Dai,et al.  Modulation of membrane dynamics and cell motility by membrane tension. , 1996, Trends in cell biology.

[20]  E. Schmelz,et al.  Erratum to "The effects of cancer progression on the viscoelasticity of ovarian cell cytoskeleton structures" [Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2012;8:93-102] , 2012 .

[21]  Claudia Tanja Mierke,et al.  The fundamental role of mechanical properties in the progression of cancer disease and inflammation , 2014, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[22]  B. Geiger,et al.  Environmental sensing through focal adhesions , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[23]  D. Hanahan,et al.  The Hallmarks of Cancer , 2000, Cell.

[24]  Z. Stachura,et al.  Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studied by scanning force microscopy , 1999, European Biophysics Journal.

[25]  G. Charras,et al.  Experimental validation of atomic force microscopy-based cell elasticity measurements , 2011, Nanotechnology.

[26]  Andreas Janshoff,et al.  Atomic force microscopy-based microrheology reveals significant differences in the viscoelastic response between malign and benign cell lines , 2014, Open Biology.

[27]  U. Aebi,et al.  The nuclear lamina is a meshwork of intermediate-type filaments , 1986, Nature.

[28]  K. Wilson,et al.  The nucleoskeleton as a genome-associated dynamic 'network of networks' , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[29]  M. Yeh,et al.  The Influence of Physical and Physiological Cues on Atomic Force Microscopy-Based Cell Stiffness Assessment , 2013, PloS one.

[30]  I. Titushkin,et al.  Distinct membrane mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells determined using laser optical tweezers. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[31]  Jacques Ferlay,et al.  Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000 , 2001, International journal of cancer.

[32]  C. Schmidt,et al.  Interference model for back-focal-plane displacement detection in optical tweezers. , 1998, Optics letters.

[33]  James K Gimzewski,et al.  AFM-based analysis of human metastatic cancer cells , 2008, Nanotechnology.

[34]  Kevin D. Costa,et al.  Single-Cell Elastography: Probing for Disease with the Atomic Force Microscope , 2004, Disease markers.

[35]  I. Schaap,et al.  A high-speed vertical optical trap for the mechanical testing of living cells at piconewton forces. , 2013, The Review of scientific instruments.

[36]  Chanmin Su,et al.  Quantitative Mechanical Property Mapping at the Nanoscale with PeakForce QNM , 2008 .

[37]  C. Lim,et al.  AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. , 2008, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.