Quantitative anatomical comparison of the ipsilateral and contralateral interhemispheric transcallosal approaches to the lateral ventricle.

OBJECTIVE The best approach to deep-seated lateral and third ventricle lesions is a function of lesion characteristics, location, and relationship to the ventricles. The authors sought to examine and compare angles of attack and surgical freedom of anterior ipsilateral and contralateral interhemispheric transcallosal approaches to the frontal horn of the lateral ventricle using human cadaveric head dissections. Illustrative clinical experiences with a contralateral interhemispheric transcallosal approach and an anterior interhemispheric transcallosal transchoroidal approach are also related. METHODS Five formalin-fixed human cadaveric heads (10 sides) were examined microsurgically. CT and MRI scans obtained before dissection were uploaded and fused into the navigation system. The authors performed contralateral and ipsilateral transcallosal approaches to the lateral ventricle. Using the navigation system, they measured areas of exposure, surgical freedom, angles of attack, and angle of view to the surgical surface. Two clinical cases are described. RESULTS The exposed areas of the ipsilateral (mean [± SD] 313.8 ± 85.0 mm2) and contralateral (344 ± 87.73 mm2) interhemispheric approaches were not significantly different (p = 0.12). Surgical freedom and vertical angles of attack were significantly larger for the contralateral approach to the most midsuperior reachable point (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively) and to the posterosuperior (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04) and central (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02) regions of the lateral wall of the lateral ventricle. Surgical freedom and vertical angles of attack to central and anterior points on the floor of the lateral ventricle did not differ significantly with approach. The angle to the surface of the caudate head region was less steep for the contralateral (135.6° ± 15.6°) than for the ipsilateral (152.0° ± 13.6°) approach (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS The anterior contralateral interhemispheric transcallosal approach provided a more expansive exposure to the lower two-thirds of the lateral ventricle and striothalamocapsular region. In normal-sized ventricles, the foramen of Monro and the choroidal fissure were better visualized through the lateral ventricle ipsilateral to the craniotomy than through the contralateral approach.

[1]  L. Rangel-Castilla,et al.  The 6 thalamic regions: surgical approaches to thalamic cavernous malformations, operative results, and clinical outcomes. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery.

[2]  T. Fukushima,et al.  [A case of ganglioglioma extended to the lateral ventricle and associated with neurofibromatosis type 1]. , 2015, No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery.

[3]  M. Preul,et al.  Comparative analysis of surgical freedom and angle of attack of two minimal-access endoscopic transmaxillary approaches to the anterolateral skull base. , 2014, World neurosurgery.

[4]  R. Spetzler,et al.  Contralateral interhemispheric approach to deep-seated cavernous malformations: surgical considerations and clinical outcomes in 31 consecutive cases. , 2014, Neurosurgery.

[5]  S. Ohba,et al.  [A case of lateral ventricle metastasis from gastric carcinoma]. , 2014, No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery.

[6]  M. Preul,et al.  Comparison of Surgical Freedom and Area of Exposure in Three Endoscopic Transmaxillary Approaches to the Anterolateral Cranial Base , 2013, Journal of Neurological Surgery—Part B.

[7]  R. Spetzler,et al.  Trans-striatocapsular contralateral interhemispheric resection of anterior inferior basal ganglia cavernous malformation. , 2013, World Neurosurgery.

[8]  M. Lawton,et al.  Deep arteriovenous malformations in the Basal Ganglia, thalamus, and insula: microsurgical management, techniques, and results. , 2013, Neurosurgery.

[9]  L. Dănăilă Primary tumors of the lateral ventricles of the brain. , 2013, Chirurgia.

[10]  M. Lawton,et al.  Contralateral transcallosal approach to basal ganglia cavernous malformation: 3-dimensional operative video. , 2013, Neurosurgery.

[11]  M. Lawton,et al.  The Contralateral Transcingulate Approach: Operative Technique and Results With Vascular Lesions , 2012, Neurosurgery.

[12]  S. Sood,et al.  Interhemispheric endoscopic resection of large intraventricular and thalamic tumors. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics.

[13]  F. Meyer,et al.  Morbidity of Transcallosal and Transcortical Approaches to Lesions in and Around the Lateral and Third Ventricles: A Single-Institution Experience , 2010, Neurosurgery.

[14]  R. Sawaya,et al.  Surgical approaches to meningiomas of the lateral ventricles , 2010, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[15]  P. Mertens,et al.  IS EXPOSURE OF THE SUPERIOR SAGITTAL SINUS NECESSARY IN THE INTERHEMISPHERIC APPROACH? , 2009, Neurosurgery.

[16]  Alexander M. Mason,et al.  CHALLENGING TRADITIONAL BELIEFS: MICROSURGERY FOR ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS OF THE BASAL GANGLIA AND THALAMUS , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[17]  U. Sure,et al.  The benefit of image guidance for the contralateral interhemispheric approach to the lateral ventricle , 2008, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[18]  M. Bisceglia,et al.  LATERAL VENTRICLE TUMORS: SURGICAL STRATEGIES ACCORDING TO TUMOR ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT—A SERIES OF 72 CASES , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[19]  S. Savolainen,et al.  Microsurgical treatment of third ventricular colloid cysts by interhemispheric far lateral transcallosal approach--experience of 134 patients. , 2008, Surgical neurology.

[20]  T. Hıcdonmez,et al.  A laboratory training model for interhemispheric-transcallosal approach to the lateral ventricle , 2006, Neurosurgical Review.

[21]  J. Villemure,et al.  Sensory and Motor Interhemispheric Integration after Section of Different Portions of the Anterior Corpus Callosum in Nonepileptic Patients , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[22]  Y. Nakasu,et al.  Mechanism of mutism following the transcallosal approach to the ventricles , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[23]  G. Ekinci,et al.  Venous variations in the region of the third ventricle: the role of MR venography , 2003, Neuroradiology.

[24]  A. Rhoton The lateral and third ventricles. , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[25]  R. Ellenbogen Transcortical surgery for lateral ventricular tumors. , 2001, Neurosurgical focus.

[26]  M. Yașargil,et al.  The transcallosal-transforaminal approach to the third ventricle with regard to the venous variations in this region. , 1997, Journal of neurosurgery.

[27]  J. Golfinos,et al.  The contralateral transcallosal approach: experience with 32 patients. , 1996, Neurosurgery.

[28]  G. Sevlever,et al.  Third ventricular malignant meningioma. , 1987, Neurosurgery.

[29]  R. A. Solomon,et al.  Interhemispheric approach for the surgical removal of thalamocaudate arteriovenous malformations. , 1987, Journal of neurosurgery.

[30]  R. Spetzler,et al.  Transcallosal approach to the contralateral ventricle. Technical note. , 1985, Journal of neurosurgery.

[31]  J. Gilsbach,et al.  Possibilities and limits of the midline interhemispheric approach. , 1985, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum.

[32]  M. Jeeves,et al.  Functional consequences of the transcallosal removal of intraventricular tumours. , 1979, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.