Settlement analysis using a generic ballasted track simulation package

Abstract Uneven track settlement inevitably occurs for ballasted track and eventually results in poor track geometry and support stiffness leading to considerably high maintenance cost. Considerable in situ and laboratory experiments have been carried out and empirical formulas have been proposed in order to predict track settlement. Nevertheless, laboratory tests are usually restricted in size for financial reasons and the site characteristics vary significantly to fully understand influential parameters. Therefore, the main aim of the present work is to develop an efficient model capable of replicating localised track settlement for different circumstances. A generic ballasted track simulation package BaTrack is introduced combining the Finite Element (FE) software Abaqus, Python, and Fortran. The three-dimensional (3D) FE model includes rail, sleepers, rail-pads, under sleeper pads (USPs), ballast and foundation layers. An advanced non-linear ballast material model is introduced using porous material properties and extended Drucker-Prager model with hardening and is able to account for different confining pressure values. The model is firstly used for comparison against a series of monotonic triaxial tests and has shown good agreement. It is then validated against a series of full size tests carried out at the Southampton Railway Testing Facility (SRTF). A number of settlement analyses are carried out and characteristics of the stress, contact pressure distribution and void evolution from different track configurations are discussed in detail.

[1]  Mingfei Lu,et al.  Discrete element modelling of railway ballast , 2008 .

[2]  Andreas Lundqvist,et al.  Load impact on railway track due to unsupported sleepers , 2005 .

[3]  Ernest T. Selig,et al.  Static and Cyclic Triaxial Testing of Ballast and Subballast , 2005 .

[4]  L M Le Pen,et al.  Contribution of Base, Crib, and Shoulder Ballast to the Lateral Sliding Resistance of Railway Track: A Geotechnical Perspective , 2011 .

[5]  Louis Le Pen,et al.  Track behaviour: the importance of the sleeper to ballast interface , 2008 .

[6]  Xuecheng Bian,et al.  Cyclic and Postcyclic Triaxial Testing of Ballast and Subballast , 2016 .

[7]  G. McDowell,et al.  Cyclic loading of railway ballast under triaxial conditions and in a railway test facility , 2009 .

[8]  C L Monismith,et al.  FACTORS INFLUENCING THE RESILIENT RESPONSE OF GRANULAR MATERIALS , 1971 .

[9]  W. Powrie,et al.  Discrete element simulation of railway ballast: modelling cell pressure effects in triaxial tests , 2016 .

[10]  Justin Kennedy,et al.  Railway track performance study using a new testing facility , 2012 .

[11]  Peter Schneider,et al.  In situ performance of a ballasted railway track with under sleeper pads , 2011 .

[12]  Yann Bezin,et al.  Modelling options for ballast track dynamics , 2017 .

[13]  Jou-Yi Shih.  Models for vehicle/track/ground interaction in the time domain , 2017 .

[14]  David Thompson,et al.  The influence of soil nonlinear properties on the track/ground vibration induced by trains running on soft ground , 2017 .

[15]  Pauli Kolisoja,et al.  3D Finite Element Model as a Tool for Analyzing the Structural Behavior of a Railway Track , 2016 .

[16]  Elena Kabo,et al.  A numerical study of the lateral ballast resistance in railway tracks , 2006 .

[17]  B. Indraratna,et al.  Effect of confining pressure on ballast degradation and deformation under cyclic triaxial loading , 2007 .

[18]  René de Borst,et al.  A numerical model for the cyclic deterioration of railway tracks , 2003 .

[19]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Effect of confining pressure on the degradation of ballast under cyclic loading , 2005 .

[20]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  VERTICAL DYNAMIC INTERACTION BETWEEN TRAIN AND TRACK INFLUENCE OF WHEEL AND TRACK IMPERFECTIONS , 1995 .

[21]  B. Indraratna,et al.  A new elastoplastic constitutive model for coarse granular aggregates incorporating particle breakage , 2004 .

[22]  Makoto Ishida,et al.  Influence of Loose Sleeper on Track Dynamics and Bending Fatigue of Rail Welds , 1999 .

[23]  Jou Yi Shih,et al.  Assessment of track-ground coupled vibration induced by high-speed trains , 2014 .

[24]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Stabilization of track substructure with geo-inclusions—experimental evidence and DEM simulation , 2017 .

[25]  José M. Goicolea,et al.  A computational procedure for prediction of ballasted track profile degradation under railway traffic loading , 2016 .

[26]  W. Zhai,et al.  Investigation of track settlement and ballast degradation in the high-speed railway using a full-scale laboratory test , 2018, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit.

[27]  B. Indraratna,et al.  Advanced Rail Geotechnology – Ballasted Track , 2011 .

[28]  B. V. Brodrick,et al.  The Nottingham railway test facility, UK , 2007 .

[29]  Sinthuja Aingaran,et al.  Experimental investigation of static and cyclic behaviour of scaled railway ballast and the effect of stress reversal , 2014 .

[30]  V. Fernandes.  Numerical analysis of nonlinear soil behavior and heterogeneity effects on railway track response , 2014 .

[31]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Development and application of constitutive model for railway ballast , 2007 .

[32]  Ben Leshchinsky,et al.  Effects of Geocell Confinement on Strength and Deformation Behavior of Gravel , 2013 .

[33]  Stephen Witt.  The Influence of Under Sleeper Pads on Railway Track Dynamics , 2008 .

[34]  Joseph E. Bowles,et al.  Foundation analysis and design , 1968 .

[35]  H. D. Christie,et al.  Shear Behavior of Railway Ballast Based on Large-Scale Triaxial Tests , 1998 .

[36]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Semiempirical Cyclic Densification Model for Ballast Incorporating Particle Breakage , 2012 .

[37]  David Thompson,et al.  Railway Noise and Vibration: Mechanisms, Modelling and Means of Control , 2008 .

[38]  G. McDowell,et al.  The importance of modelling ballast particle shape in the discrete element method , 2006 .

[39]  William Powrie,et al.  A review and evaluation of ballast settlement models using results from the Southampton Railway Testing Facility (SRTF) , 2016 .

[40]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Behavior of Geocell-Reinforced Subballast Subjected to Cyclic Loading in Plane-Strain Condition , 2015 .

[41]  Nick Thom,et al.  An investigation of railway sleeper sections and under sleeper pads using a box test apparatus , 2016 .

[42]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Modelling of geocell-reinforced subballast subjected to cyclic loading , 2016 .

[43]  William F. Anderson,et al.  Behavior of Railroad Ballast under Monotonic and Cyclic Loading , 2008 .

[44]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Analysis of the performance of under sleeper pads - a critical review , 2015 .

[45]  Glenn R. McDowell,et al.  Discrete element modelling of railway ballast under monotonic and cyclic triaxial loading , 2010 .