Visual Temporal Contrast Sensitivity in the Behaving Mouse Shares Fundamental Properties with Human Psychophysics

Abstract The mammalian visual system has a remarkable capacity to detect differences in contrast across time, which is known as temporal contrast sensitivity (TCS). Details of the underlying neural mechanisms are rapidly emerging as a result of a series of elegant electrophysiological studies performed largely with the mouse as an experimental model. However, rigorous psychophysical methods are necessary to pair the electrophysiology with temporal visual behavior in mouse. The optomotor response is frequently used as a proxy for retinal temporal processing in rodents. However, subcortical reflexive pathways drive the optomotor response rather than cortical decision-making areas. To address this problem, we have developed an operant behavior assay that measures TCS in behaving mice. Mice were trained to perform a forced-choice visual task and were tested daily on their ability to distinguish flickering from nonflickering overhead lights. Correct responses (Hit and Correct Rejections) were rewarded. Contrast, temporal frequency, and mean illumination of the flicker were the independent variables. We validated and applied the theory of signal detection to estimate the discriminability factor (d´), a measure of performance that is independent of response bias and motivation. The empirical contrast threshold was defined as the contrast necessary to elicit d´ = 1 and TCS as the inverse of the contrast threshold. With this approach, we established in the mouse a model of human vision that shares fundamental properties of human temporal psychophysics such as Weber adaptation in response to low temporal frequency flicker and illumination-dependent increases in critical flicker frequency as predicted by the Ferry–Porter law.

[1]  Fred Rieke,et al.  Cellular and Circuit Mechanisms Shaping the Perceptual Properties of the Primate Fovea , 2017, Cell.

[2]  Edward N. Pugh,et al.  From candelas to photoisomerizations in the mouse eye by rhodopsin bleaching in situ and the light-rearing dependence of the major components of the mouse ERG , 2004, Vision Research.

[3]  Mark S. Cembrowski,et al.  A Synaptic Mechanism for Retinal Adaptation to Luminance and Contrast , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Donald C. Hood,et al.  Temporal frequency dependent adaptation at the level of the outer retina in humans , 1992, Vision Research.

[5]  Yumiko Umino,et al.  A system to measure the pupil response to steady lights in freely behaving mice , 2016, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  F. Rieke,et al.  Light adaptation in cone vision involves switching between receptor and post-receptor sites , 2007, Nature.

[7]  F. Kingdom,et al.  Applying the Model-Comparison Approach to Test Specific Research Hypotheses in Psychophysical Research Using the Palamedes Toolbox , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[8]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Psychophysical measurement of contrast sensitivity in the behaving mouse. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Kenneth D. Harris,et al.  High-Yield Methods for Accurate Two-Alternative Visual Psychophysics in Head-Fixed Mice , 2016, bioRxiv.

[10]  G. H. Jacobs,et al.  Influence of cone pigment coexpression on spectral sensitivity and color vision in the mouse , 2004, Vision Research.

[11]  M. Carandini,et al.  Probing perceptual decisions in rodents , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  E. Marg THE ACCESSORY OPTIC SYSTEM * , 1964 .

[13]  J. Robson Spatial and Temporal Contrast-Sensitivity Functions of the Visual System , 1966 .

[14]  G. H. Jacobs,et al.  Response to Comment on "Emergence of Novel Color Vision in Mice Engineered to Express a Human Cone Photopigment" , 2007, Science.

[15]  D. H. Kelly Visual response to time-dependent stimuli. I. Amplitude sensitivity measurements. , 1961, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[16]  Yumiko Umino,et al.  The Relationship between Slow Photoresponse Recovery Rate and Temporal Resolution of Vision , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Mark S. Cembrowski,et al.  Adaptation to Background Light Enables Contrast Coding at Rod Bipolar Cell Synapses , 2014, Neuron.

[18]  C. Tyler,et al.  Analysis of visual modulation sensitivity. IV. Validity of the Ferry-Porter law. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  R M Douglas,et al.  Independent visual threshold measurements in the two eyes of freely moving rats and mice using a virtual-reality optokinetic system , 2005, Visual Neuroscience.

[20]  Andrew D. Zaharia,et al.  The Detection of Visual Contrast in the Behaving Mouse , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  L. Frishman,et al.  Postreceptoral contributions to the light-adapted ERG of mice lacking b-waves. , 2008, Experimental eye research.

[22]  H DE LANGE DZN,et al.  Research into the dynamic nature of the human fovea-cortex systems with intermittent and modulated light. I. Attenuation characteristics with white and colored light. , 1958, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[23]  Yumiko Umino,et al.  Speed, Spatial, and Temporal Tuning of Rod and Cone Vision in Mouse , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Joel Pokorny,et al.  Sequential processing in vision: The interaction of sensitivity regulation and temporal dynamics , 2008, Vision Research.

[25]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[26]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[27]  Robert G. Smith,et al.  Ideal observer analysis of signal quality in retinal circuits , 2009, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[28]  J. Hurley,et al.  Scotopic and Photopic Visual Thresholds and Spatial and Temporal Discrimination Evaluated by Behavior of Mice in a Water Maze† , 2006, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[29]  Don McNicol,et al.  A Primer of Signal Detection Theory , 1976 .

[30]  W D Wright,et al.  Color Science, Concepts and Methods. Quantitative Data and Formulas , 1967 .

[31]  W. Levick,et al.  ON direction‐selective ganglion cells in the mouse retina , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  J. Robson,et al.  Evidence for a ganglion cell contribution to the primate electroretinogram (ERG): Effects of TTX on the multifocal ERG in macaque , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[33]  A. Milam,et al.  Cone photoreceptor function loss-3, a novel mouse model of achromatopsia due to a mutation in Gnat2. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[34]  Nicholas W. Oesch,et al.  Ribbon synapses compute temporal contrast and encode luminance in retinal rod bipolar cells , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  F. Rieke,et al.  Controlling the Gain of Rod-Mediated Signals in the Mammalian Retina , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Spatiotemporal modulation transfer in the human eye. , 1967, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[37]  E. Pugh,et al.  Bright flash response recovery of mammalian rods in vivo is rate limited by RGS9 , 2017, The Journal of general physiology.

[38]  R. Shapley,et al.  Light adaptation in the primate retina: Analysis of changes in gain and dynamics of monkey retinal ganglion cells , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[39]  T. M. Esdaille,et al.  Dark Light, Rod Saturation, and the Absolute and Incremental Sensitivity of Mouse Cone Vision , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  D. Tranchina,et al.  Light adaptation in turtle cones. Testing and analysis of a model for phototransduction. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[41]  S. Youngentob,et al.  OMP gene deletion causes an elevation in behavioral threshold sensitivity. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[42]  M. Scanziani,et al.  Distinct recurrent versus afferent dynamics in cortical visual processing , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  D. Copenhagen,et al.  Weber and noise adaptation in the retina of the toad Bufo marinus , 1990, The Journal of general physiology.

[44]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Chapter 9 Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls , 1984 .