Finding Value Using Momentum

Value investing has been one of the cornerstones of equity investment strategies. This article provides a new methodology to select value stocks using the concept of relative value across firms. Results show that using multiple value ratios as foundation blocks provides better risk-adjusted returns than using a single ratio, as used by the Fama–French HML factor. The use of trends in fundamental ratios helps capture value in a stock portfolio in a new way. The trend in value metrics ranks firms that are not just cheap compared to the cross-section but also those that have become cheaper over time. The results show that this relative value method proves effective for individual value parameters and when combined to create a composite value model. Trends carry incremental information not captured by common factor models and control variables. The authors construct a composite value model that uses trends in six value ratios. Momentum when combined with value generates enhanced return performance, as documented in various academic literatures. The authors extend the discussion on the combination of momentum with value using three different methods.

[1]  Josef Lakonishok,et al.  Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk , 1993 .

[2]  E. Fama,et al.  Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds , 1993 .

[3]  E. Fama,et al.  The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns , 1992 .

[4]  Jessica A. Wachter,et al.  Why is Long-Horizon Equity Less Risky? A Duration-Based Explanation of the Value Premium , 2005 .

[5]  Lu Zhang,et al.  An Augmented q-Factor Model with Expected Growth , 2020 .

[6]  S. Basu The relationship between earnings' yield, market value and return for NYSE common stocks: Further evidence , 1983 .

[7]  Ronald J. Lanstein,et al.  Persuasive evidence of market inefficiency , 1985 .

[8]  Yao Hua Ooi,et al.  Time Series Momentum , 2011 .

[9]  Tim Loughran,et al.  New Evidence on the Relation between the Enterprise Multiple and Average Stock Returns , 2010, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[10]  Sandip Mukherji,et al.  Do Sales–Price and Debt–Equity Explain Stock Returns Better than Book–Market and Firm Size? , 1996 .

[11]  Lu Zhang,et al.  The Value Premium , 2002 .

[12]  Juhani T. Linnainmaa,et al.  The History of the Cross Section of Stock Returns , 2016 .

[13]  Long Chen,et al.  The Expected Value Premium , 2006 .

[14]  Clifford S. Asness,et al.  The Devil in HML’s Details , 2013, The Journal of Portfolio Management.

[15]  R. Haugen,et al.  Commonality in the Determinants of Expected Stock Returns , 1996 .

[16]  Shivaram Rajgopal,et al.  Value-Glamour and Accruals Mispricing: One Anomaly or Two? , 2004 .

[17]  S. Basu,et al.  Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to their Price-Earnings Ratios , 1977 .

[18]  Clifford S. Asness,et al.  Value and Momentum Everywhere: Value and Momentum Everywhere , 2013 .

[19]  Richard A. Zuber,et al.  The Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to Their Price-Earnings Ratios: An Update of the Basu Study , 1989 .

[20]  Bryan T. Kelly,et al.  Factor Momentum Everywhere , 2018 .

[21]  Narasimhan Jegadeesh,et al.  Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency , 1993 .