Accuracy analysis of the GPS instrumental bias estimated from observations in middle and low latitudes

Abstract. With one bias estimation method, the latitude-related error distribution of instrumental biases estimated from the GPS observations in Chinese middle and low latitude region in 2004 is analyzed statistically. It is found that the error of GPS instrumental biases estimated under the assumption of a quiet ionosphere has an increasing tendency with the latitude decreasing. Besides the asymmetrical distribution of the plasmaspheric electron content, the obvious spatial gradient of the ionospheric total electron content (TEC) along the meridional line that related to the Equatorial Ionospheric Anomaly (EIA) is also considered to be responsible for this error increasing. The RMS of satellite instrumental biases estimated from mid-latitude GPS observations in 2004 is around 1 TECU (1 TECU = 1016/m2), and the RMS of the receiver's is around 2 TECU. Nevertheless, the RMS of satellite instrumental biases estimated from GPS observations near the EIA region is around 2 TECU, and the RMS of the receiver's is around 3–4 TECU. The results demonstrate that the accuracy of the instrumental bias estimated using ionospheric condition is related to the receiver's latitude with which ionosphere behaves a little differently. For the study of ionospheric morphology using the TEC derived from GPS data, in particular for the study of the weak ionospheric disturbance during some special geo-related natural hazards, such as the earthquake and severe meteorological disasters, the difference in the TEC accuracy over different latitude regions should be paid much attention.

[1]  Wei Zhang,et al.  The influence of geomagnetic storms on the estimation of GPS instrumental biases , 2009 .

[2]  Anthony J. Mannucci,et al.  A comparative study of ionospheric total electron content measurements using global ionospheric maps of GPS, TOPEX radar, and the Bent model , 1997 .

[3]  Michael Charles Kelly,et al.  The Earth's Ionosphere: Plasma Physics and Electrodynamics, Second Edition , 2009 .

[4]  James R. Clynch,et al.  Variability of GPS satellite differential group delay biases , 1991 .

[5]  Yi-Ben Tsai,et al.  Pre-earthquake ionospheric anomalies registered by continuous GPS TEC measurements , 2004 .

[6]  Claudio Brunini,et al.  Temporal and spatial variability of the bias between TOPEX- and GPS-derived total electron content , 2005 .

[7]  Takashi Maruyama,et al.  Determination of GPS receiver differential biases by neural network parameter estimation method , 2005 .

[8]  Dale N. Anderson,et al.  Comparisons of TOPEX and Global Positioning System total electron content measurements at equatorial anomaly latitudes , 1997 .

[9]  Attila Komjathy,et al.  Kalman filter-based algorithms for monitoring the ionosphere and plasmasphere with GPS in near-real time , 2009 .

[10]  Guanyi Ma,et al.  Derivation of TEC and estimation of instrumental biases from GEONET in Japan , 2002 .

[11]  Hong Yuan,et al.  Traveling ionospheric disturbances associated with the tropospheric vortexes around Qinghai‐Tibet Plateau , 1998 .

[12]  Z. Xiao,et al.  Study of ionospheric response to the 4B flare on 28 October 2003 using International GPS Service network data , 2005 .

[13]  Andrew J. Mazzella,et al.  Plasmasphere effects for GPS TEC measurements in North America , 2009 .

[14]  Gregory Bishop,et al.  The effect of the protonosphere on the estimation of GPS total electron content: Validation using model simulations , 1999 .

[15]  Xiaoqing Pi,et al.  Global ionosphere perturbations monitored by the Worldwide GPS Network , 1996 .

[16]  Anthony J. Mannucci,et al.  A global mapping technique for GPS‐derived ionospheric total electron content measurements , 1998 .

[17]  Aleksandar Jovancevic,et al.  Ionospheric measurement with GPS: Receiver techniques and methods , 2007 .

[18]  P. V. S. Rama Rao,et al.  Spatial distribution of ionization in the equatorial and low‐latitude ionosphere of the Indian sector and its effect on the pierce point altitude for GPS applications during low solar activity periods , 2007 .

[19]  S. Thampi,et al.  An additional layer in the low‐latitude ionosphere in Indian longitudes: Total electron content observations and modeling , 2007 .

[20]  W. Wan,et al.  The relationship between ionospheric total electron content (TEC) over East Asia and the tropospheric circulation around the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau obtained with a partial correlation method , 2008 .

[21]  Gabor E. Lanyi,et al.  A comparison of mapped and measured total ionospheric electron content using global positioning system and beacon satellite observations , 1988 .

[22]  Zuo Xiao,et al.  Temporal dependence of GPS cycle slip related to ionospheric irregularities over China low‐latitude region , 2010 .

[23]  Gregory Bishop,et al.  Autonomous estimation of plasmasphere content using GPS measurements , 2002 .

[24]  Sandro M. Radicella,et al.  Calibration errors on experimental slant total electron content (TEC) determined with GPS , 2007 .

[25]  A. Rius,et al.  Estimation of the transmitter and receiver differential biases and the ionospheric total electron content from Global Positioning System observations , 1994 .

[26]  Michael Mendillo,et al.  Storms in the ionosphere: Patterns and processes for total electron content , 2006 .

[27]  E. Sardón,et al.  Estimation of total electron content using GPS data: How stable are the differential satellite and receiver instrumental biases? , 1997 .