Visual strategies for enhancing user perception of task relationships in emergency operations centers

In time-sensitive environments, such as DHS emergency operations centers (EOCs), it is imperative for decision makers to rapidly understand and address key logical relationships that exist between tasks, entities, and events, even as conditions fluctuate. These relationships often have important temporal characteristics, such as tasks that must be completed before others can be started (e.g., buses must be transported to an area before an evacuation process can begin). Unfortunately, traditional temporal display methods, such as mission timelines, typically reveal only rudimentary event details and fail to support user understanding of and reasoning about critical temporal constraints and interrelationships across multiple mission components. To address these shortcomings, we developed a visual language to enhance temporal data displays by explicitly and intuitively conveying these constraints and relationships to decision makers. In this paper, we detail these design strategies and describe ongoing evaluation efforts to assess their usability and effectiveness to support decision-making tasks in complex, time-sensitive environments. We present a case study in which we applied our visual enhancements to a timeline display, improving the perception of logical relationships among events in a Master Scenario Event List (MSEL). These methods reduce the cognitive workload of decision makers and improve the efficacy of identification.

[1]  B. Marx The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1985 .

[2]  J. V. van Wijk,et al.  Cluster and calendar based visualization of time series data , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis'99).

[3]  Jock D. Mackinlay,et al.  The perspective wall: detail and context smoothly integrated , 1991, CHI.

[4]  Stefan Biffl,et al.  PlanningLines: novel glyphs for representing temporal uncertainties and their evaluation , 2005, Ninth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'05).

[5]  James F. Allen Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals , 1983, CACM.

[6]  Alexander H. Levis,et al.  Project management using point graphs , 2009, Syst. Eng..

[7]  Matt Jensen NewsBlip Visualizing Complex Semantic Timelines , 2003 .

[8]  Bongwon Suh,et al.  Time Tree: Exploring Time Changing Hierarchies , 2006, 2006 IEEE Symposium On Visual Analytics Science And Technology.

[9]  Murray Turoff,et al.  Human-computer interaction , 2007, Commun. ACM.

[10]  Luca Chittaro,et al.  Representation of temporal intervals and relations: information visualization aspects and their evaluation , 2001, Proceedings Eighth International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning. TIME 2001.

[11]  Marek J. Sergot,et al.  A logic-based calculus of events , 1989, New Generation Computing.

[12]  Yuval Shahar,et al.  AsbruView: Visualization of Time-Oriented, Skeletal Plans , 1998, AIPS.

[13]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Dynamic Query Tools for Time Series Data Sets: Timebox Widgets for Interactive Exploration , 2004, Inf. Vis..

[14]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  LifeLines: visualizing personal histories , 1996, CHI.

[15]  E L Quarantelli,et al.  Ten criteria for evaluating the management of community disasters. , 1997, Disasters.

[16]  Lucy T. Nowell,et al.  ThemeRiver: Visualizing Thematic Changes in Large Document Collections , 2002, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[17]  Monica M. C. Schraefel,et al.  Continuum: designing timelines for hierarchies, relationships and scale , 2007, UIST.

[18]  Silvia Miksch,et al.  Metaphors of movement: a visualization and user interface for time-oriented, skeletal plans , 2001, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[19]  James F. Allen Time and time again: The many ways to represent time , 1991, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[20]  Carol McCann,et al.  The human in command : exploring the modern military experience , 2000 .