Effective DQE (eDQE) and speed of digital radiographic systems: an experimental methodology.

Prior studies on performance evaluation of digital radiographic systems have primarily focused on the assessment of the detector performance alone. However, the clinical performance of such systems is also substantially impacted by magnification, focal spot blur, the presence of scattered radiation, and the presence of an antiscatter grid. The purpose of this study is to evaluate an experimental methodology to assess the performance of a digital radiographic system, including those attributes, and to propose a new metric, effective detective quantum efficiency (eDQE), a candidate for defining the efficiency or speed of digital radiographic imaging systems. The study employed a geometric phantom simulating the attenuation and scatter properties of the adult human thorax and a representative indirect flat-panel-based clinical digital radiographic imaging system. The noise power spectrum (NPS) was derived from images of the phantom acquired at three exposure levels spanning the operating range of the clinical system. The modulation transfer function (MTF) was measured using an edge device positioned at the surface of the phantom, facing the x-ray source. Scatter measurements were made using a beam stop technique. The eDQE was then computed from these measurements, along with measures of phantom attenuation and x-ray flux. The MTF results showed notable impact from the focal spot blur, while the NPS depicted a large component of structured noise resulting from use of an antiscatter grid. The eDQE was found to be an order of magnitude lower than the conventional DQE. At 120 kVp, eDQE(0) was in the 8%-9% range, fivefold lower than DQE(0) at the same technique. The eDQE method yielded reproducible estimates of the system performance in a clinically relevant context by quantifying the inherent speed of the system, that is, the actual signal to noise ratio that would be measured under clinical operating conditions.

[1]  E. Samei,et al.  Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2k and 4k storage phosphor radiography systems. , 1999, Medical physics.

[2]  Ying Chen,et al.  Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function. , 2006, Medical physics.

[3]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Assessment of detective quantum efficiency: intercomparison of a recently introduced international standard with prior methods. , 2007, Radiology.

[4]  E. Samei,et al.  A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. , 1998, Medical physics.

[5]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Fundamental imaging characteristics of a slot-scan digital chest radiographic system. , 2004, Medical physics.

[6]  Robert L. Williams,et al.  HRR ATR using eigen templates with noisy observations in unknown target scenario , 2000, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[7]  C E Ravin,et al.  Quantitative scatter measurement in digital radiography using a photostimulable phosphor imaging system. , 1991, Medical physics.

[8]  Ehsan Samei Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors. , 2003, Medical physics.

[9]  Alistair Mackenzie,et al.  Computed Radiography (CR) Systems for Mammography A Comparative Technical Report Edition 2 , 2006 .

[10]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. , 2003, Medical physics.

[11]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Study of the generalized MTF and DQE for a new microangiographic system , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems. , 2002, Medical physics.

[13]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Generalized performance evaluation of x-ray image intensifier compared with a microangiographic system , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[14]  C E Ravin,et al.  Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[15]  E. Samei,et al.  Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography. , 2006, Medical physics.

[16]  Xinming Liu,et al.  Optimization of MTF and DQE in magnification radiography: a theoretical analysis , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[17]  F R Verdun,et al.  A comparison of the performance of digital mammography systems. , 2007, Medical physics.

[18]  A. Rose The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale. , 1948, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[19]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Generalizing the MTF and DQE to include x-ray scatter and focal spot unsharpness: application to a new microangiographic system. , 2005, Medical physics.

[20]  Ying Chen,et al.  Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum. , 2006, Medical physics.

[21]  Renato Campanini,et al.  Comparison of different commercial FFDM units by means of physical characterization and contrast-detail analysis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[22]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Comparative scatter and dose performance of slot-scan and full-field digital chest radiography systems. , 2005, Radiology.

[23]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray detectors for digital radiography. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  T. R. Fewell,et al.  Beam quality independent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposure from x-ray automatic exposure controlled chest examinations. , 1984, Medical physics.

[25]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  Standardization of NPS measurement: interim report of AAPM TG16 , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[26]  Christoph Hoeschen,et al.  Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of digital X-ray detectors according to the novel standard IEC 62220-1. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[27]  E. Muntz,et al.  Analysis of the significance of scattered radiation in reduced dose mammography, including magnification effects, scatter suppression, and focal spot and detector blurring. , 1979, Medical physics.

[28]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Efficiency of the human observer compared to an ideal observer based on a generalized NEQ which incorporates scatter and geometric unsharpness: evaluation with a 2AFC experiment , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.