Port-access Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Increases Surgical Complexity, Increases Operating Room Time, and Facilitates Early Postoperative Hospital Discharge

Background Proposed advantages of port-access cardiac surgery have yet to be substantiated. The authors retrospectively compared patients undergoing port-access cardiac surgery with a matched group undergoing conventional cardiac surgery. Methods Forty-six patients who underwent port-access cardiac surgery were matched with 46 who underwent conventional cardiac surgery. Absolute criteria for matching included morning-of-surgery admission, procedure undergone, and care being delivered by one of two surgeons. If possible, matching included care delivered by one of two anesthesiologists. Patients were matched as closely as possible for preoperative demographic and clinical characteristics. Results All 46 pairs of patients were matched for procedure and admitted the morning of surgery. All 92 operations were performed by one of two surgeons, and 89% were performed by one of two anesthesiologists. Preoperative demographic and clinical characteristics were equivalent between groups. Compared with conventional cardiac surgery, port-access cardiac surgery increased surgical complexity (it almost tripled cardiopulmonary bypass time during coronary artery bypass grafting and increased it almost 40% during mitral valve procedures) and increased total operating room time (P < 0.0001). Port-access cardiac surgery had no beneficial effect on earlier postoperative extubation, decreased incidence of atrial fibrillation, or intensive care unit time, yet it decreased postoperative duration of stay (P = 0.029, all patients), a benefit observed primarily in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (P = 0.002). Conclusions This retrospective analysis revealed that port-access cardiac surgery increases surgical complexity, increases operating room time, has no effect on earlier postoperative extubation or decreased incidence of atrial fibrillation or intensive care unit time, and may facilitate postoperative hospital discharge (primarily in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting). Properly designed prospective investigation is necessary to ascertain whether port-access cardiac surgery truly offers any benefits over conventional cardiac surgery.

[1]  R. Shemin,et al.  Intraoperative rupture of the endoaortic clamp balloon in a patient undergoing port-access mitral valve repair. , 1999, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[2]  T Walther,et al.  Pain and quality of life after minimally invasive versus conventional cardiac surgery. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  R. Shemin,et al.  PORT-ACCESS MINIMALLY INVASIVE MULTI-VESSEL CABG IS ASSOCIATED WITH SHORT POST-OPERATIVE DURATION OF TRACHEAL INTUBATION, ICU STAY AND HOSPITAL STAY , 1999 .

[4]  C. Borst,et al.  Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: an experimental perspective. , 1999, Circulation.

[5]  M. Mack,et al.  Inertia of success. A response to minimally invasive coronary bypass: a dissenting opinion. , 1999, Circulation.

[6]  H. Scheld,et al.  Anastomosis to the wrong vessel during off-pump bypass surgery via mini-thoracotomy. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  L. Siegel,et al.  Initial misinterpretation of a transesophageal echocardiographic image: potential for alteration of a planned minimally invasive procedure. , 1999, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[8]  W. Gray,et al.  Ultra-fast track hospital discharge using conventional cardiac surgical techniques. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  A. Galloway,et al.  First report of the Port Access International Registry. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  G. Olinger Informed advice. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  C. Mangano Show me the money (but first show me the data!). , 1998, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[12]  M. Chaney,et al.  An institution's initial experience with port-access minimally invasive cardiac surgery. , 1998, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[13]  H. Reichenspurner,et al.  Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery--clinical experiences with a PortAccess system. , 1998, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[14]  D. Glower,et al.  Mitral valve operation via Port Access versus median sternotomy. , 1998, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[15]  D. Boehm,et al.  Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: port-access approach versus off-pump techniques. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  D. Cooley Minimally invasive valve surgery versus the conventional approach. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  D. Ullyot,et al.  Minimally invasive coronary bypass: a dissenting opinion. , 1998, Circulation.

[18]  D. Abramson,et al.  Perforation of the right ventricle with a coronary sinus catheter during preparation for minimally invasive cardiac surgery. , 1998, Anesthesiology.

[19]  I Kronzon,et al.  Utility of transesophageal echocardiography during port-access minimally invasive cardiac surgery. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  S. Gundry,et al.  Seven-year follow-up of coronary artery bypasses performed with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. , 1998, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[21]  D. Glower,et al.  Endovascular aortic balloon clamp malposition during minimally invasive cardiac surgery: detection by transcranial Doppler monitoring. , 1998, Anesthesiology.

[22]  A. Galloway,et al.  Minimally invasive port-access coronary artery bypass grafting with early angiographic follow-up: initial clinical experience. , 1998, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[23]  G. Pearce,et al.  Port-access cardiac surgery protocols and early outcomes. , 1998, Critical care nursing clinics of North America.

[24]  J. Baldwin Editorial (con) re minimally invasive port-access mitral valve surgery. , 1998, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[25]  E. Verrier Editorial (pro) re minimally invasive port-access mitral valve surgery. , 1998, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[26]  T Walther,et al.  Minimally invasive port-access mitral valve surgery. , 1998, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[27]  W. Daniel,et al.  Port-Access coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[28]  M. Reardon,et al.  Minimally invasive coronary artery surgery--a word of caution. , 1997, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[29]  T. Burdon,et al.  Monitoring considerations for port-access cardiac surgery. , 1997, Circulation.

[30]  J. Toomasian,et al.  Extracorporeal circulation for port-access cardiac surgery , 1997, Perfusion.

[31]  T. Burdon,et al.  Port-access mitral valve replacement in dogs. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[32]  R. S. Mitchell,et al.  Port-access coronary artery bypass with cardioplegic arrest: acute and chronic canine studies. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[33]  A. Galloway,et al.  Minimally invasive cardiopulmonary bypass with cardioplegic arrest: a closed chest technique with equivalent myocardial protection. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[34]  R. S. Mitchell,et al.  Port-access coronary artery bypass grafting: a proposed surgical method. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[35]  A. Lusky,et al.  Coronary artery bypass without cardiopulmonary bypass: analysis of short-term and mid-term outcome in 220 patients. , 1995, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[36]  W. S. Peters Minimally invasive cardiac surgery by cardioscopy , 1993 .