Patterns of Victimization Between and Within Peer Clusters in a High School Social Network

This study presents a descriptive analysis of patterns of violent victimization between and within the various cohesive clusters of peers comprising a sample of more than 500 9th–12th grade students from one high school. Social network analysis techniques provide a visualization of the overall friendship network structure and allow for the examination of variation in victimization across the various peer clusters within the larger network. Social relationships among clusters with varying levels of victimization are also illustrated so as to provide a sense of possible spatial clustering or diffusion of victimization across proximal peer clusters. Additionally, to provide a sense of the sorts of peer clusters that support (or do not support) victimization, characteristics of clusters at both the high and low ends of the victimization scale are discussed. Finally, several of the peer clusters at both the high and low ends of the victimization continuum are “unpacked,” allowing examination of within-network individual-level differences in victimization for these select clusters.

[1]  B. Fisher,et al.  Something Old, Something New: Revisiting Competing Hypotheses of the Victimization-Offending Relationship Among Adolescents , 2011 .

[2]  J. McGloin.  DELINQUENCY BALANCE: REVISITING PEER INFLUENCE* , 2009 .

[3]  Gary F. Jensen,et al.  Gender, Lifestyles, and Victimization: Beyond Routine Activity , 1986, Violence and Victims.

[4]  Graham C. Ousey,et al.  Déjà vu All Over Again: Investigating Temporal Continuity of Adolescent Victimization , 2008 .

[5]  Robert Apel,et al.  Youth Behavior, School Structure, and Student Risk of Victimization , 2008 .

[6]  Bonnie S. Fisher,et al.  Self-control, Victimization, and their Influence on Risky Lifestyles: A Longitudinal Analysis Using Panel Data , 2006 .

[7]  J. Mitchell Miller,et al.  Trouble in the School Yard: a Study of the Risk Factors of Victimization at School , 2003 .

[8]  Dana L. Haynie,et al.  RACE, FRIENDSHIP NETWORKS, AND VIOLENT DELINQUENCY , 2006 .

[9]  Pamela Wilcox,et al.  Gender, Adolescent Lifestyles, and Violent Victimization: Implications for Routine Activity Theory , 2010 .

[10]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[11]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Introduction to social network analysis , 2007, BCS HCI.

[12]  Jean Marie McGloin,et al.  Self-Control and Deviant Peer Network Structure , 2009 .

[13]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[14]  Dana L. Haynie,et al.  Reconsidering Peers and Delinquency: How do Peers Matter? , 2005 .

[15]  Francis T. Cullen,et al.  CRIME IN THE IVORY TOWER: THE LEVEL AND SOURCES OF STUDENT VICTIMIZATION* , 1998 .

[16]  Pamela Wilcox,et al.  The Effects of School Crime Prevention on Students’ Violent Victimization, Risk Perception, and Fear of Crime: A Multilevel Opportunity Perspective , 2011 .

[17]  Kimberly A. Fredericks,et al.  An introduction to social network analysis , 2005 .

[18]  Mark Warr.  Companions in Crime: The Social Aspects of Criminal Conduct , 2002 .

[19]  S. C. Johnson.  Hierarchical clustering schemes , 1967, Psychometrika.

[20]  Vincent F. Sacco,et al.  Criminal Circumstance: A Dynamic Multicontextual Criminal Opportunity Theory (review) , 2004 .

[21]  Patrick M. O'Malley,et al.  Routine activities and individual deviant behavior , 1996 .

[22]  Michael R. Gottfredson,et al.  OF CRIMINAL VICTIMIZATION , 1981 .

[23]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach , 1979 .

[24]  D. Gottfredson,et al.  SCHOOLS AS COMMUNITIES: THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG COMMUNAL SCHOOL ORGANIZATION, STUDENT BONDING, AND SCHOOL DISORDER* , 2003 .

[25]  Janet L. Lauritsen,et al.  Conventional and Delinquent Activities: Implications for the Prevention of Violent Victimization among Adolescents , 1992, Violence and Victims.

[26]  J. Moody,et al.  DELINQUENCY AND THE STRUCTURE OF ADOLESCENT PEER GROUPS. , 2011, Criminology : an interdisciplinary journal.

[27]  Bonnie S. Fisher,et al.  The social context of violent victimization: A study of the delinquent peer effect , 2004 .

[28]  D. Wayne Osgood,et al.  A reappraisal of the overlap of violent offenders and victims. , 2008 .

[29]  Graham C. Ousey,et al.  Opportunity Theory and Adolescent School-Based Victimization , 2002, Violence and Victims.

[30]  D. Haynie.  Delinquent Peers Revisited: Does Network Structure Matter?1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  Michael R. Gottfredson,et al.  Victims of Personal Crime: An Empirical Foundation for a Theory of Personal Victimization , 1977 .

[32]  Terance D. Miethe,et al.  Contextual Effects in Models of Criminal Victimization , 1993 .

[33]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  Linking the micro- and macro-level dimensions of lifestyle-routine activity and opportunity models of predatory victimization , 1987 .

[34]  Richard A. Wright,et al.  A study of individual and situational antecedents of violent victimization , 2002 .

[35]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. , 1997, Science.

[36]  Francis T. Cullen,et al.  Criminal Circumstance: A Dynamic Multicontextual Criminal Opportunity Theory , 2004 .

[37]  Christopher J. Schreck,et al.  Specifying the Influence of Family and Peers on Violent Victimization , 2004, Journal of interpersonal violence.