PURPOSE
The GDx (Laser Diagnostic Technologies, San Diego, CA) is a scanning laser polarimeter designed to assess the peripapillary nerve fiber layer in vivo. On the GDx, a nerve fiber bundle can appear as a single or as a split bundle. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of split nerve fiber layer bundles and to demonstrate their clinical relevance.
DESIGN
Cross-sectional study.
PARTICIPANTS
Two hundred fifty-four healthy volunteers participated.
METHODS
We imaged 454 eyes of 254 healthy white persons with the GDx. All eyes had intraocular pressure of 21 mmHg or less, normal appearance of the optic nerve head, and normal visual fields (Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2 full threshold program). According to our working definition, a bundle appeared 'split' when the color-coded pixels corresponding to areas of higher retardation were clearly divided into two more-or-less symmetrical parts not resembling a wedge defect. The classification was performed by two independent observers who used an identical set of reference examples to standardize the classification.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
The presence of a split nerve fiber layer bundle.
RESULTS
Interobserver agreement was very good (kappa = 0.83), and a consensus was reached in all cases. In 419 eyes (92.3%) there was no split bundle. A split superior bundle was seen in 29 eyes (6.4%). A split inferior bundle was observed in five eyes (1.1%), and in one eye (0.2%) a split bundle was seen superiorly and inferiorly. When considering subjects, a split superior bundle (either in the right eye, or in the left eye, or in both eyes) occurred in 12.0% of normal subjects. The 'superior maximum' parameter was significantly lower in eyes with a split superior bundle than in eyes with a single superior bundle (67.2 microm vs. 89.9 microm; P<0.001). The same was observed for the 'symmetry' parameter (0.88 microm vs. 0.98 microm; P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Split nerve fiber layer bundles are a common finding in healthy eyes when imaged with the GDx. A split superior bundle is the most frequent variation, in which cases an abnormal superior maximum or symmetry parameter, otherwise potential indicators of glaucoma, should not readily be interpreted as abnormal.
[1]
R. Weinreb,et al.
Histopathologic validation of Fourier-ellipsometry measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.
,
1990,
Archives of ophthalmology.
[2]
A. Dreher,et al.
Differentiating patients with glaucoma from glaucoma suspects and normal subjects by nerve fiber layer assessment with scanning laser polarimetry.
,
1998,
Ophthalmology.
[3]
H. Lemij,et al.
Scanning laser polarimetry in a selected group of patients with glaucoma and normal controls.
,
2001,
American journal of ophthalmology.
[4]
A. W. Dreher,et al.
Retinal laser ellipsometry : a new method for measuring the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness distribution ?
,
1992
.
[5]
H. Lemij,et al.
The sensitivity and specificity of nerve fiber layer measurements in glaucoma as determined with scanning laser polarimetry.
,
1997,
American journal of ophthalmology.
[6]
J G Fujimoto,et al.
Evaluation of focal defects of the nerve fiber layer using optical coherence tomography.
,
1996,
Ophthalmology.
[7]
H. Lemij,et al.
Improved Reproducibility of Measurements with the Nerve Fiber Analyzer
,
1997,
Journal of glaucoma.
[8]
L. Zangwill,et al.
Detection of glaucoma with scanning laser polarimetry.
,
1998,
Archives of ophthalmology.
[9]
L. Zangwill,et al.
Scanning laser polarimetry to measure the nerve fiber layer of normal and glaucomatous eyes.
,
1995,
American journal of ophthalmology.
[10]
J. DeVries,et al.
Improved reproducibility of measurements with the nerve fiber analyzer.
,
1997
.
[11]
H. Lemij,et al.
Measurement by nerve fiber analyzer of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal subjects and patients with ocular hypertension.
,
1996,
American journal of ophthalmology.
[12]
Douglas G. Altman,et al.
Practical statistics for medical research
,
1990
.