The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) - Scope, Evolution and Enhancements

After the introduction in Section 2, we very briefly sketch out current theoretical and empirical developments in the social sciences. In our view, they all point in the same direction: toward the acute and increasing need for multidisciplinary longitudinal data covering a wide range of living conditions and based on a multitude of variables from the social sciences for both theoretical investigation and the evaluation of policy measures. Cohort and panel studies are therefore called upon to become truly interdisciplinary tools. In Section 3, we describe the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP), in which we discuss recent improvements of that study which approach this ideal and point out existing shortcomings. Section 4 concludes with a discussion of potential future issues and developments for SOEP and other household panel studies.

[1]  L. Collins.  Analysis of longitudinal data: the integration of theoretical model, temporal design, and statistical model. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  Robert Sugden,et al.  The Road Not Taken: How Psychology Was Removed from Economics, and How it Might Be Brought Back , 2007 .

[3]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Labor Market Discrimination and Racial Differences in Premarket Factors* , 2003, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[4]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Neural Systems Responding to Degrees of Uncertainty in Human Decision-Making , 2005, Science.

[5]  Glen H. Elder,et al.  Methods of life course research : qualitative and quantitative approaches , 1998 .

[6]  Janet Zollinger Giele,et al.  Methods of Life Course Research , 1999 .

[7]  Uwe Sunde,et al.  Individual Risk Attitudes: New Evidence from a Large, Representative, Experimentally-Validated Survey , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[8]  Jürgen Schupp,et al.  Familie und soziale Netzwerke. Ein revidiertes Erhebungskonzept für das Sozio-oekonomische Panel (SOEP) im Jahre 2006 , 2006 .

[9]  Ed Diener,et al.  Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities , 1994 .

[10]  Samuel M. McClure,et al.  Separate Neural Systems Value Immediate and Delayed Monetary Rewards , 2004, Science.

[11]  Camelia M. Kuhnen,et al.  The Neural Basis of Financial Risk Taking , 2005, Neuron.

[12]  G. Wagner,et al.  Characteristics and impact of faked interviews in surveys – An analysis of genuine fakes in the raw data of SOEP , 2005 .

[13]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: reactions to changes in marital status. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Karl Ulrich Mayer,et al.  CHAPTER TWO Life Courses and Life Chances in a Comparative Perspective , 2007, Analyzing Inequality.

[15]  Lisa Wade,et al.  The potential relevances of biology to social inquiry , 2003 .

[16]  Markus M. Grabka,et al.  Editing and Multiple Imputation of Item-Non-Response in the 2002 Wealth Module of the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) , 2007 .

[17]  Jan Goebel,et al.  Using Analysis of Gini (ANOGI) for Detecting Whether Two Subsamples Represent the Same Universe , 2006 .

[18]  J.A.M. Heijke,et al.  Fitting to the job: the role of generic and vocational competenties in adjustment and performance , 2003 .

[19]  Richard V. Burkhauser,et al.  The contribution and potential of data harmonization for cross-national comparative research , 2005 .

[20]  Richard V. Burkhauser,et al.  The English language public use file of the German Socio-Economic Panel , 1993 .

[21]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future , 2003 .

[22]  D. D. de Quervain,et al.  The Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment , 2004, Science.

[23]  Melissa A. Osborne Groves,et al.  How important is your personality? Labor market returns to personality for women in the US and UK , 2005 .

[24]  Markus M. Grabka,et al.  A Comparison of the Main Household Income Surveys for Germany: EVS and SOEP , 2003 .

[25]  R. Sampson,et al.  ASSESSING "NEIGHBORHOOD EFFECTS": Social Processes and New Directions in Research , 2002 .

[26]  Frauke Kreuter,et al.  Data Analysis Using Stata , 2005 .

[27]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  A Nation-Wide Laboratory: Examining Trust and Trustworthiness by Integrating Behavioral Experiments into Representative Survey , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[28]  Ulman Lindenberger,et al.  Life satisfaction shows terminal decline in old age: longitudinal evidence from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP). , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[29]  Paul F. Lazarsfeld,et al.  THE “PANEL” AS A NEW TOOL FOR MEASURING OPINION , 1938 .

[30]  Jörg-Peter Schräpler,et al.  Explaining Income Nonresponse – A Case Study by means of the British Household Panel Study (BHPS) , 2006 .

[31]  John H. Tyler,et al.  Measuring the Returns to the Ged: Using an Exogenous Change in Ged Passing Standards as a Natural Experiment , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[32]  L. Philip Schumm.  Review of Data Analysis Using Stata by Kohler and Kreuter , 2005 .

[33]  W. C. Riddell,et al.  Literacy and earnings: an investigation of the interaction of cognitive and unobserved skills in earnings generation , 2003 .

[34]  E. Nyhus,et al.  The effects of personality on earnings , 2005 .

[35]  Graham A. Colditz,et al.  Merging and emerging cohorts: Not worth the wait , 2007, Nature.

[36]  Gert G. Wagner,et al.  Die Messung der Greifkraft als objektives Gesundheitsmaß in Sozialwissenschaftlichen Bevölkerungsumfragen: Erhebungsmethodische und inhaltliche Befunde auf der Basis von SHARE und SOEP , 2006 .

[37]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Neurally reconstructing expected utility , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[38]  Jürgen Schupp,et al.  The German socio‐economic panel: A database for longitudinal international comparisons , 1995 .

[39]  Markus M. Grabka,et al.  Item nonresponse on income questions in panel surveys: Incidence, imputation and the impact on inequality and mobility , 2005 .

[40]  Jürgen Schupp,et al.  Enhancing the Power of Household Panel Studies: The Case of the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) ; Paper Prepared for the StatCan-Conference "Longitudinal Social Surveys in an International Perspective", McGill University, Montreal, 25-27 Jan 2006 , 2006 .

[41]  Lex Borghans,et al.  Is There a Link between Economic Outcomes and Genetic Evolution? Cross-Country Evidence from the Major Histocompatibility Complex , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[42]  Frieder R. Lang,et al.  Assessing Cognitive Capacities in Computer-Assisted Survey Research: Two Ultra-Short Tests of lntellectual Ability in the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) , 2007, Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch.

[43]  Gert G. Wagner,et al.  Maintenance of and Innovation in Long-Term Panel Studies: The Case of the German Socio-Economic Panel (Gsoep) , 2002 .

[44]  Martin Diewald,et al.  Unitary Social Science for Causal Understanding: Experiences and Prospects of Life Course Research , 2001 .

[45]  Jörg-Peter Schräpler,et al.  Respondent Behavior in Panel Studies , 2004 .

[46]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics , 2005 .

[47]  E. Fehr,et al.  Neuroeconomic Foundations of Trust and Social Preferences: Initial Evidence. , 2005, The American economic review.

[48]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others , 2006, Nature.

[49]  Christin Schäfer,et al.  Automatic Identification of Faked and Fraudulent Interviews in Surveys by Two Different Methods , 2004 .

[50]  Ó. Marcenaro-Gutierrez,et al.  Career progression: Getting‐on, getting‐by and going nowhere , 2005 .

[51]  Markus M. Grabka,et al.  Imputed Rent and Income Inequality: A Decomposition Analysis for Great Britain, West Germany and the U.S , 2003 .

[52]  Jürgen Schupp,et al.  Greifkraftmessung im Sozio-oekonomischen Panel (SOEP) , 2007 .

[53]  Richard V. Burkhauser,et al.  The German Socio-Economic Panel: A Representative Sample of Reunited Germany and its Parts , 1997 .

[54]  Martin Kroh,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of Popular Well-Being Measures , 2006 .

[55]  Kevin Denny,et al.  Can education compensate for low ability? Evidence from British data , 2004 .

[56]  Hans-Juergen Krupp.  The German Socio-Economic Panel: How It All Began , 2008 .

[57]  Richard J. Murnane,et al.  Estimating the Labor Market Signaling Value of the GED , 2000 .

[58]  Dan Mallett,et al.  Sampling and Weighting , 2006 .

[59]  D. Kahneman.  A Psychological Perspective on Economics , 2003 .

[60]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Back to Bentham? Explorations of experience utility , 1997 .

[61]  Scott M. Hofer,et al.  Biological Models of Behavior and the Life Course , 2003 .

[62]  Faruk Gul,et al.  The Case for Mindless Economics , 2005 .

[63]  Anna Kim,et al.  Familie und soziale Netzwerke , 2001 .

[64]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Oxytocin increases trust in humans , 2005, Nature.

[65]  Greg J. Duncan,et al.  The Panel Study of Income Dynamics. , 1985 .