Predictivity of system delays shortens human response time

System delays considerably affect users' experience and performance. Research on the psychological effects of system delays has focused on delay length and variability. We introduce delay predictivity as a new factor profoundly affecting user performance. A system delay is predictive when its duration is informative about the nature of consecutive interaction events. We report an experiment (N=122) where short delays were differently distributed across two alternative target stimuli in a choice response task. We manipulated variability and predictivity of delays. For one group of participants the delays were of constant duration. For three other groups the delays were variable, but differed in predictivity. They were either non-predictive, probabilistically predictive (they predicted the targets with a probability of 0.8), or deterministically predictive. Performance with constant delays was superior to performance with variable non-predictive or with probabilistically predictive delays. Surprisingly, participants with deterministically predictive delays outperformed participants in all other groups. This has important implications for interface design, whenever there is some degree of freedom in scheduling system delays. Best performance is achieved with predictive delays, but only when deterministic predictivity can be achieved. Otherwise, constant delays are to be preferred over variable ones.

[1]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Combining Expectancies , 1992 .

[2]  Mike Wendt,et al.  Conflict adaptation in time: Foreperiods as contextual cues for attentional adjustment , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Felicia Roberts,et al.  Judgments Concerning the Valence of Inter-Turn Silence Across Speakers of American English, Italian, and Japanese , 2011 .

[4]  W. Kuhmann Experimental investigation of stress-inducing properties of system response times. , 1989, Ergonomics.

[5]  W. McD. Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie , 1902, Nature.

[6]  A. Nobre,et al.  Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by Both PET and fMRI , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Ondrej Krejcar,et al.  Problem Solving of Low Data Throughput on Mobile Devices by Artefacts Prebuffering , 2009, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[8]  Robert Langner,et al.  Distraction by irrelevant sound during foreperiods selectively impairs temporal preparation. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[9]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  When the Wait Isn't So Bad: The Interacting Effects of Website Delay, Familiarity, and Breadth , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Joachim Hoffmann,et al.  Temporal cueing of target-identity and target-location. , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[11]  Gale L. Martin,et al.  System response time effects on user productivity , 1986 .

[12]  Keikichi Hirose,et al.  Filled pauses as cues to the complexity of upcoming phrases for native and non-native listeners , 2008, Speech Commun..

[13]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[14]  John A. Hoxmeier,et al.  System Response Time and User Satisfaction: An Experimental Study of Browser-based Applications , 2000 .

[15]  André J. Szameitat,et al.  Behavioral and emotional consequences of brief delays in human-computer interaction , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  The world wide wait: effects of delays on user performance , 2000 .

[17]  U. Hess,et al.  Transformations for within-subject designs: a Monte Carlo investigation. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Raymond M Klein,et al.  Isolating exogenous and endogenous modes of temporal attention. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  S. Los,et al.  Dissociative patterns of foreperiod effects in temporal discrimination and reaction time tasks , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Verena C. Seibold,et al.  Does temporal preparation increase the rate of sensory information accumulation? , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[21]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Chronism Theory, Culture, and System Delay: A Longitudinal Study of Post-Apartheid South Africa , 2009, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[22]  C LucasHenry,et al.  System response time operator productivity, and job satisfaction , 1983 .

[23]  Dobri Awramoff Arbeit und Rhythmus : der Einfluss des Rhythmus auf die Quantität und Qualität geistiger und körperlicher Arbeit, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des rhythmischen Schreibens , 1902 .

[24]  R. Whelan Effective Analysis of Reaction Time Data , 2008 .

[25]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems , 1993, INTERCHI.

[26]  Bettina Rolke,et al.  Temporal preparation facilitates perceptual identification of letters , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Ethan V. Munson,et al.  40 Years of Searching for the Best Computer System Response Time , 2011, Interact. Comput..

[28]  Filip De Turck,et al.  Upstream bandwidth optimization of thin client protocols through latency‐aware adaptive user event buffering , 2011, Int. J. Commun. Syst..

[29]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Determining Causes and Severity of End-User Frustration , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[30]  Werner Kuhmann,et al.  System response time and readiness for task execution the optimum duration of inter-task delays , 1997 .

[31]  Florian Schaefer,et al.  The Effect of System Response Times on Temporal Predictability of Work Flow in Human-Computer Interaction , 1990 .

[32]  Lawrence M. Schleifer,et al.  International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction , 2009 .

[33]  Alexander P. Pons Semantic prefetching objects of slower web site pages , 2006, J. Syst. Softw..

[34]  Florian Weber,et al.  Improving the Human–Computer Dialogue With Increased Temporal Predictability , 2013, Hum. Factors.

[35]  Robert C. Williges,et al.  Modeling the Human Operator in Computer-Based Data Entry , 1982 .

[36]  Shu-Sheng Liaw,et al.  Information retrieval from the World Wide Web: a user-focused approach based on individual experience with search engines , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  The scope and precision of specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[38]  William C. Treurniet,et al.  The effects of feedback during delays in simulated teletext reception , 1988 .

[39]  Sander A. Los,et al.  The effective time course of preparation , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  Joachim Hoffmann,et al.  Response specific temporal expectancy: Evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[41]  Cees J. H. Midden,et al.  Monitoring and Evaluation of Time Delay , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[42]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  G. Dreisbach,et al.  Temporal Predictability Facilitates Action, Not Perception , 2013, Psychological science.

[44]  Joachim Hoffmann,et al.  The specificity of temporal expectancy: Evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[45]  Andrea Kiesel,et al.  Time in action contexts: learning when an action effect occurs , 2011, Psychological Research.

[46]  T. Mexia,et al.  Author ' s personal copy , 2009 .

[47]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  System response time operator productivity, and job satisfaction , 1983, CACM.

[48]  Christina Freytag,et al.  Designing And Engineering Time The Psychology Of Time Perception In Software , 2016 .

[49]  Christopher A. Sanchez,et al.  Feedback Preferences and Impressions of Waiting , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[50]  P. J. Foley The foreperiod and simple reaction time. , 1959, Canadian journal of psychology.

[51]  Jacek Blazewicz,et al.  Handbook on Scheduling: From Theory to Applications , 2014 .

[52]  Marco Steinhauser,et al.  Performance monitoring and the causal attribution of errors , 2011, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[53]  Donald Laming,et al.  Information theory of choice-reaction times , 1968 .

[54]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Dynamic adjustment of temporal preparation: shifting warning signal modality attenuates the sequential foreperiod effect. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[55]  B. Milliken,et al.  Endogenous temporal orienting of attention in detection and discrimination tasks , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[56]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  The effect of a cross-trial shift of auditory warning signals on the sequential foreperiod effect. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[57]  Stephen W. Draper,et al.  How machine delays change user strategies , 1996, SGCH.

[58]  Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah,et al.  A study on tolerable waiting time: how long are Web users willing to wait? , 2004, AMCIS.

[59]  Michael Hildebrandt,et al.  Detecting system failures from durations and binary cues , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[60]  Anne-Laure Sellier,et al.  Valuing time: Moderate download times can improve online goal pursuit , 2009 .

[61]  P. Coignet On specificity , 2003 .

[62]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  A psychological investigation of long retrieval times on the World Wide Web , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[63]  A. Gorea,et al.  Comparison of perceptual and motor latencies via anticipatory and reactive response times , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[64]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Interface feature prioritization for web services: Case of online flight reservations , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[65]  W. Boucsein,et al.  Standardized task strain and system response times in human-computer interaction. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[66]  B. Rolke,et al.  Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[67]  Allan Kuchinsky,et al.  Integrating user-perceived quality into Web server design , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[68]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Time-course analysis of temporal preparation on central processes , 2012, Psychological research.

[69]  Chris Roast Designing for delay in interactive information retrieval , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[70]  D. Knol,et al.  The foreperiod effect revisited: conditioning as a basis for nonspecific preparation. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[71]  W Kuhmann,et al.  Experimental investigation of psychophysiological stress-reactions induced by different system response times in human-computer interaction. , 1987, Ergonomics.

[72]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Impaired temporal discrimination within the attentional blink , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[73]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Sequential effects within a short foreperiod context: evidence for the conditioning account of temporal preparation. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[74]  Verena C. Seibold,et al.  Temporal attention shortens perceptual latency: a temporal prior entry effect. , 2011, Psychophysiology.