Configural and featural information in facial-composite images.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Peter J B Hancock | Charlie D Frowd | Cristina Fodarella | Leah Greenwood | Steve Fields | John E Marsh | P. Hancock | C. Frowd | F. Skelton | A. McIntyre | S. Jones | Cristina Fodarella | S. Fields | Anna Williams | J. Marsh | Rachel Thorley | Laura Nelson | L. Greenwood | L. Date | Kevin Kearley | Sharrome Jones | Faye Skelton | Anna Williams | Rachel Thorley | Laura Nelson | Louisa Date | Kevin Kearley | Alex H McIntyre | Louisa Date
[1] G. Hole,et al. Is There a Linear or a Nonlinear Relationship between Rotation and Configural Processing of Faces? , 2002, Perception.
[2] K. Fujii,et al. Visualization for the analysis of fluid motion , 2005, J. Vis..
[3] Adrian Schwaninger,et al. Role of Featural and Configural Information in Familiar and Unfamiliar Face Recognition , 2002, Biologically Motivated Computer Vision.
[4] A Johnston,et al. Shape from Shading. I: Surface Curvature and Orientation , 1994, Perception.
[5] I. Biederman,et al. Is Pigmentation Important for Face Recognition? Evidence from Contrast Negation , 2006, Perception.
[6] Vicki Bruce,et al. Four heads are better than one: combining face composites yields improvements in face likeness. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.
[7] V Bruce,et al. Modelling face recognition. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[8] P. Hancock,et al. Robust representations for face recognition: The power of averages , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.
[9] Vicki Bruce,et al. Improving the quality of facial composites using a holistic cognitive interview. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[10] B. Rossion,et al. Nonlinear relationship between holistic processing of individual faces and picture-plane rotation: evidence from the face composite illusion. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[11] C. McManus,et al. Sensitivity to the Displacement of Facial Features in Negative and Inverted Images , 1990, Perception.
[12] G. Hole. Configurational Factors in the Perception of Unfamiliar Faces , 1994, Perception.
[13] M. Farah,et al. Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[14] A. Mizuno,et al. A change of the leading player in flow Visualization technique , 2006, J. Vis..
[15] V. Bruce. Changing faces: visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition. , 1982, British journal of psychology.
[16] J. Tanaka,et al. Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.
[17] V. Bruce,et al. Local and Relational Aspects of Face Distinctiveness , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[18] B. Rossion. Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. , 2008, Acta psychologica.
[19] C. Liu,et al. Lighting direction affects recognition of untextured faces in photographic positive and negative , 1999, Vision Research.
[20] M. Farah,et al. What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.
[21] G. Rhodes,et al. Revisiting the Perception of Upside-Down Faces , 2000, Psychological science.
[22] G. Hole,et al. Evidence for Holistic Processing of Faces Viewed as Photographic Negatives , 1999, Perception.
[23] Charlie D. Frowd,et al. Understanding the multiframe caricature advantage for recognizing facial composites , 2012 .
[24] Roberto Cabeza,et al. Features are Also Important: Contributions of Featural and Configural Processing to Face Recognition , 2000, Psychological science.
[25] Charlie D. Frowd,et al. Automating the Processes Involved in Facial Composite Production and Identification , 2009, 2009 Symposium on Bio-inspired Learning and Intelligent Systems for Security.
[26] R. Yin. Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .
[27] V Bruce,et al. The Use of Pigmentation and Shading Information in Recognising the Sex and Identities of Faces , 1994, Perception.
[28] H. Bülthoff,et al. Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape , 1996, Vision Research.
[29] Jonathan W. Schooler,et al. Verbalization produces a transfer inappropriate processing shift. , 2002 .
[30] Edgar Erdfelder,et al. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[31] Charlie D. Frowd,et al. A forensically valid comparison of facial composite systems , 2005 .
[32] R. Bruyer,et al. Effect of disorientation on visual analysis, familiarity decision and semantic decision on faces. , 1993, British journal of psychology.
[33] V. Bruce,et al. The basis of the 3/4 view advantage in face recognition , 1987 .
[34] A. Young,et al. Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.
[35] V. Bruce,et al. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology When Inverted Faces Are Recognized: the Role of Configural Information in Face Recognition , 2022 .
[36] G. Hole,et al. Effects of Geometric Distortions on Face-Recognition Performance , 2002, Perception.
[37] Alan D. Baddeley,et al. On Training People to Recognize Faces , 1979 .
[38] Peter J B Hancock,et al. Familiarity effects in the construction of facial-composite images using modern software systems , 2011, Ergonomics.
[39] R. Galper,et al. Recognition of faces in photographic negative , 1970 .
[40] Evolving facial composite systems , 2009 .
[41] Forensic Psychology and Law , 2009 .
[42] F. Mast,et al. The face‐inversion effect can be explained by the capacity limitations of an orientation normalization mechanism , 2005 .
[43] A. Johnston,et al. Recognising Faces: Effects of Lighting Direction, Inversion, and Brightness Reversal , 2013, Perception.
[44] H. Ellis,et al. Face recognition accuracy as a function of mode of representation. , 1978 .
[45] H. Leder,et al. When Feature Information Comes First! Early Processing of Inverted Faces , 2005, Perception.
[46] Bruno Rossion,et al. Face inversion disproportionately impairs the perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between features. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[47] Vicki Bruce,et al. The relative importance of external and internal features of facial composites. , 2007, British journal of psychology.
[48] Vicki Bruce,et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of pixelation and blurring on masking the identity of familiar faces , 2001 .
[49] Ronald P. Fisher,et al. Constructing facial composites with the mac-a-mug pro system , 1997 .
[50] Roy S. Malpass,et al. Use of facial composite systems in US law enforcement agencies , 2006 .
[51] Charlie D. Frowd,et al. EvoFIT: A holistic, evolutionary facial imaging technique for creating composites , 2004, TAP.
[52] V. Bruce,et al. Mental rotation of faces , 1988, Memory & cognition.
[53] J. Sergent. An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.
[54] Michael B. Lewis,et al. The Lady'S Not for Turning: Rotation of the Thatcher Illusion , 2001, Perception.
[55] T. Poggio,et al. I think I know that face... , 1996, Nature.
[56] E. Gigliotti. Discovering Statistics Using spss. Second Edition , 2007 .
[57] R. Phillips. Why are faces hard to recognize in photographic negative? , 1972 .
[58] David Nunez,et al. An evaluation of ID: an eigenface based construction system , 2006, South Afr. Comput. J..
[59] D. Perrett,et al. Perception and recognition of photographic quality facial caricatures: Implications for the recognition of natural images , 1991 .
[60] V. Bruce,et al. Effects of lighting on the perception of facial surfaces. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[61] Charlie D. Frowd,et al. Hair today, gone tomorrow: holistic processing of facial-composite images , 2012 .
[62] G. Hole. Identity-specific face adaptation effects: Evidence for abstractive face representations , 2011, Cognition.
[63] P. Hancock,et al. Whole-face procedures for recovering facial images from memory. , 2013, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[64] G Davies,et al. Facial composite production: a comparison of mechanical and computer-driven systems. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.
[65] [Effects of configural information on face shape perception]. , 2005, Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology.
[66] V. Bruce,et al. Recognition of unfamiliar faces , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[67] S. Gibson,et al. Nonlinear, near photo-realistic caricatures using a parametric facial appearance model , 2005, Behavior research methods.
[68] M. Wogalter,et al. Face composite construction : in-view and from-memory quality and improvement with practice , 1991 .
[69] P. Hancock,et al. Recovering faces from memory: the distracting influence of external facial features. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[70] S. Ullman,et al. Generalization to Novel Images in Upright and Inverted Faces , 1993, Perception.
[71] V. Bruce,et al. Parallel approaches to composite production: interfaces that behave contrary to expectation , 2007, Ergonomics.
[72] S. Carey,et al. Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[73] Four heads are better than one , 2013 .
[74] Mark H. Johnson,et al. Oxford Handbook of Face Perception , 2011 .
[75] R. Watt,et al. Biological "bar codes" in human faces. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[76] Andrew J. Edmonds,et al. Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: A review , 2009, Memory.
[77] Michael B. Lewis. Eye-Witnesses Should Not Do Cryptic Crosswords Prior to Identity Parades , 2006, Perception.
[78] I. Craw,et al. Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.
[79] P. Hancock,et al. An evaluation of US systems for facial composite production , 2007, Ergonomics.
[80] Charlie D. Frowd,et al. Contemporary composite techniques: The impact of a forensically-relevant target delay. , 2005 .
[81] J. Bartlett,et al. Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[82] G. Hole,et al. Featural and Configurational Processes in the Recognition of Faces of Different Familiarity , 2000, Perception.
[83] G. Wells,et al. Memory for faces: Encoding and retrieval operations , 1984, Memory & cognition.
[84] George A. F. Seber,et al. Linear regression analysis , 1977 .
[85] Michael J. Tarr,et al. The role of surface pigmentation for recognition revealed by contrast reversal in faces and Greebles , 2005, Vision Research.
[86] R Kemp,et al. Perception and Recognition of Normal and Negative Faces: The Role of Shape from Shading and Pigmentation Cues , 1996, Perception.
[87] Bruno Rossion,et al. Early electrophysiological responses to multiple face orientations correlate with individual discrimination performance in humans , 2007, NeuroImage.
[88] James W. Tanaka,et al. Features, Configuration, and Holistic Face Processing , 2011 .
[89] M. White,et al. Effect of Photographic Negation on Matching the Expressions and Identities of Faces , 2001, Perception.
[90] P. Sinha,et al. Contribution of Color to Face Recognition , 2002, Perception.
[91] D. Perrett,et al. Manipulation of Colour and Shape Information and its Consequence upon Recognition and Best-Likeness Judgments , 2000, Perception.
[92] G. Hole,et al. The role of spatial and surface cues in the age-processing of unfamiliar faces , 2000 .
[93] G. Davies,et al. Face recall: an examination of some factors limiting composite production accuracy. , 1982, The Journal of applied psychology.
[94] M. Bindemann,et al. Brain potential correlates of face recognition: geometric distortions and the N250r brain response to stimulus repetitions. , 2008, Psychophysiology.
[95] P. Hancock,et al. Interviewing Techniques for Darwinian Facial-Composite Systems , 2012 .
[96] Tim Valentine,et al. Evolving and combining facial composites: between-witness and within-witness morphs compared. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[97] Ahmed M. Megreya,et al. Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task , 2006, Memory & cognition.
[98] V. Bruce,et al. The importance of ‘mass’ in line drawings of faces , 1992 .
[99] H. Ellis,et al. Identification of Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces from Internal and External Features: Some Implications for Theories of Face Recognition , 1979, Perception.
[100] A. Freire,et al. The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.
[101] V. Bruce,et al. The psychology of face construction: Giving evolution a helping hand. , 2011 .