AE index forecast at different time scales through an ANN algorithm based on L1 IMF and plasma measurements

Abstract The AE index is known to have two main components, one directly driven by the solar wind and the other related to the magnetotail unloading process. As regards the role played by the IMF and solar wind parameters, recently several authors used artificial neural networks (ANN) to forecast AE from solar wind data. Following this track, in this paper we present a study of the AE forecast at different time scales, from 5 min to 1 h, in order to check whether the performance of the ANN prediction varies significantly as a function of the AE time resolution.The study is based on a new ANN Elman network with B z (in GSM) and V x as inputs, one hidden layer containing four neurons, four context units and one output neuron. We find that the forecast AE values, during disturbed AE periods, result to be always smaller than the experimental values; on the other hand, the algorithm performance improves as the time scale increases, i.e. the total standard deviation (calculated over a test data set) between the forecast and the Kyoto AE decreases as the averaging time increases. Under the hypothesis that this decrease follows an exponential law, we find that the 1 h scale normalised standard deviation is 0.975, very close to the asymptotic value of 0.95 for an infinite averaging time. We interpret our results in the sense that the unloading component of the AE variations cannot be predicted from IMF and solar wind parameters only.

[1]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  A description of the solar wind-magnetosphere coupling based on nonlinear filters , 1995 .

[2]  Byung-Ho Ahn,et al.  The Joule heat production rate and the particle energy injection rate as a function of the geomagnetic indices AE and AL , 1983 .

[3]  Y. Kamide,et al.  Two‐component auroral electrojet: Importance for substorm studies , 1996 .

[4]  H. Gleisner,et al.  Auroral electrojet predictions with dynamic neural networks , 2001 .

[5]  Wolfgang Baumjohann,et al.  Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling , 1993 .

[6]  A. Sharma,et al.  Global and multiscale aspects of magnetospheric dynamics in local-linear filters , 2002 .

[7]  Masahisa Sugiura,et al.  Auroral electrojet activity index AE and its universal time variations. , 1966 .

[8]  V. Uritsky,et al.  Comparative study of dynamical critical scaling in the auroral electrojet index versus solar wind fluctuations , 2001 .

[9]  D. Prichard,et al.  The non‐linear response of the magnetosphere: 30 October 1978 , 1993, comp-gas/9305003.

[10]  A. Sharma,et al.  Combining global and multi-scale features in a description of the solar wind-magnetosphere coupling , 2003 .

[11]  A. Sharma,et al.  Modeling and prediction of the magnetospheric dynamics during intense geospace storms , 2006 .

[12]  M. Freeman,et al.  Evidence for a solar wind origin of the power law burst lifetime distribution of the AE indices , 2000 .

[13]  H. Gleisner,et al.  Response of the auroral electrojets to the solar wind modeled with neural networks , 1997 .

[14]  C. Clauer,et al.  DP 1 and DP 2 current systems for the March 22, 1979 substorms , 1985 .

[15]  William J. Burke,et al.  Variable time delays in the propagation of the interplanetary magnetic field , 2002 .

[16]  G. Consolini,et al.  Local intermittency measure analysis of AE index: The directly driven and unloading component , 2005 .

[17]  Konstantinos Papadopoulos,et al.  Global and multi‐scale features of solar wind‐magnetosphere coupling: From modeling to forecasting , 2004 .

[18]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  Edward J. Smith,et al.  The nonlinear response of AE to the IMF BS driver: A spectral break at 5 hours , 1990 .

[20]  G. Consolini,et al.  Geomagnetic D st index forecast based on IMF data only , 2006 .

[21]  J. Takalo,et al.  Neural network prediction of AE data , 1997 .

[22]  G. Parks,et al.  Physics Of Space Plasmas: An Introduction , 1991 .

[23]  S. Akasofu,et al.  Mathematical separation of directly driven and unloading components in the ionospheric equivalent currents during substorms , 1998 .

[24]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  Magnetospheric Impulse Response for Many Levels of Geomagnetic Activity , 1985 .