Cognitive engineering in aerospace application: Pilot interaction with cockpit automation

Because of recent incidents involving glass-cockpit aircraft, there is growing concern with cockpit automation and its potential effects on pilot performance. However, little is known about the nature and causes of problems that arise in pilot-automation interaction. The results of two studies that provide converging, complementary data on pilots' difficulties with understanding and operating one of the core systems of cockpit automation, the Flight Management System (FMS) is reported. A survey asking pilots to describe specific incidents with the FMS and observations of pilots undergoing transition training to a glass cockpit aircraft served as vehicles to gather a corpus on the nature and variety of FMS-related problems. The results of both studies indicate that pilots become proficient in standard FMS operations through ground training and subsequent line experience. But even with considerable line experience, they still have difficulties tracking FMS status and behavior in certain flight contexts, and they show gaps in their understanding of the functional structure of the system. The results suggest that design-related factors such as opaque interfaces contribute to these difficulties which can affect pilots' situation awareness. The results of this research are relevant for both the design of cockpit automation and the development of training curricula specifically tailored to the needs of glass cockpits.

[1]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Pilot Interaction With Cockpit Automation: Operational Experiences With the Flight Management System , 1992 .

[2]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Movement of attentional focus across the visual field: A critical look at the evidence , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  W A Wagenaar,et al.  Does the expert know? The reliability of predictions and confidence ratings of experts , 1986 .

[4]  David Woods,et al.  Risk and human performance: Measuring the potential for disaster , 1990 .

[5]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity is task dependent: evidence from selective search. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[6]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  The Prevention of Mode Errors Through Sensory Feedback , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  David Woods,et al.  Visualization of dynamic processes: function-based displays for human-intelligent system interaction , 1992, [Proceedings] 1992 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  David Woods,et al.  Guidance for human interface with artificial intelligence systems , 1991 .

[9]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of New Technology on Human-Machine Cooperation , 1993 .

[10]  Emilie M. Roth,et al.  Navigating through Large Display Networks in Dynamic Control Applications , 1990 .

[11]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  How in the World Did We Ever Get into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory Control , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[12]  David Woods,et al.  Event driven timeline displays: beyond message lists in human-intelligent system interaction , 1991, Conference Proceedings 1991 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Designing for error , 1987 .

[14]  David Woods,et al.  Representation aiding: a ten year retrospective , 1991, Conference Proceedings 1991 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[15]  David Woods,et al.  Situation Awareness: A Critical But Ill-Defined Phenomenon , 1991 .

[16]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Patterns of experience in text editing , 1983, CHI '83.

[17]  David Woods,et al.  The Sophistry of Guidelines: Revisiting Recipes for Color Use in Human-Computer Interface Design , 1992 .

[18]  P. Adler New Technologies, New Skills , 1986 .

[19]  William Rogers,et al.  A principled approach to the measurement of situation awareness in commercial aviation , 1992 .

[20]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT) , 1988, Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference.

[21]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  The 'problem' of automation: inappropriate feedback and interaction , 1990 .

[22]  David Woods,et al.  The Natural History of Introducing New Information Technology into a High-Risk Environment , 1990 .

[23]  D. Gopher The skill of attention control: acquisition and execution of attention strategies , 1993 .

[24]  David Woods,et al.  HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION IN CONTEXT: PHYSICIAN INTERACTION WITH AUTOMATED INTRAVENOUS CONTROLLERS IN THE HEART ROOM , 1993 .

[25]  David D. Woods,et al.  Modeling and predicting human error , 1989 .

[26]  David Woods,et al.  Cognitive consequences of clumsy automation on high workload, high consequence human performance , 1991 .

[27]  Judith Orasanu,et al.  Decision Making in Action , 1994 .

[28]  David D. Woods,et al.  The price of flexibility , 1993, IUI '93.

[29]  S. R. Bereiter Sources of Difficulty in troubleshooting automated manufacturing systems , 1988 .

[30]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Pilot Interaction With Cockpit Automation II: An Experimental Study of Pilots’ Model and Awareness of the Flight Management System , 1994 .

[31]  D. Norman Categorization of action slips. , 1981 .

[32]  David D. Woods,et al.  Human interaction with intelligent systems: an overview and bibliography , 1991, SGAR.

[33]  N. B. Sarter,et al.  The flight management system-pilots' interaction with cockpit automation , 1991, Conference Proceedings 1991 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[34]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  G. J. Klein,et al.  The role of mental simulation in problem solving and decision making , 2018 .

[36]  David Woods,et al.  Nosocomial automation: technology-induced complexity and human performance , 1991, Conference Proceedings 1991 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[37]  David Woods,et al.  The alarm problem and directed attention in dynamic fault management , 1995 .

[38]  David Woods,et al.  Human interaction with intelligent systems: trends, problems and new directions , 1991, Conference Proceedings 1991 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[39]  Formal Papers Pilot Interaction With Cockpit Automation 11: An Experimental Study of Pilots' Model and Awareness of the Flight Management System , 1994 .

[40]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Mode Error in Supervisory Control of Automated Systems , 1992 .