This paper presents the results of a structural equation model (SEM) for describing and quantifying the fundamental factors that affect contract disputes between owners and contractors in the construction industry. Through this example, the potential impact of SEM analysis in construction engineering and management research is illustrated. The purpose of the specific model developed in this research is to explain how and why contract related construction problems occur. This study builds upon earlier work, which developed a disputes potential index, and the likelihood of construction disputes was modeled using logistic regression. In this earlier study, questionnaires were completed on 159 construction projects, which measured both qualitative and quantitative aspects of contract disputes, management ability, financial planning, risk allocation, and project scope definition for both owners and contractors. The SEM approach offers several advantages over the previously employed logistic regression methodology. The final set of structural equations provides insight into the interaction of the variables that was not apparent in the original logistic regression modeling methodology.
[1]
James E. Diekmann,et al.
Are contract disputes predictable
,
1995
.
[2]
Jeffrey S. Russell,et al.
Predicting Construction Contractor Failure Prior to Contract Award
,
1992
.
[3]
Keith R. Molenaar,et al.
MODEL FOR PUBLIC SECTOR DESIGN-BUILD PROJECT SELECTION
,
1998
.
[4]
H. Randolph Thomas,et al.
Masonry Productivity Forecasting Model
,
1993
.
[5]
R. Stine,et al.
Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Structural Equation Models
,
1992
.
[6]
R. Hoyle.
Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications
,
1997
.