Towards guidelines to harmonize textural features in PET: Haralick textural features vary with image noise, but exposure-invariant domains enable comparable PET radiomics

Purpose Image texture is increasingly used to discriminate tissues and lesions in PET/CT. For quantification or in computer-aided diagnosis, textural feature analysis must produce robust and comparable values. Because statistical feature values depend on image count statistics, we investigated in depth the stability of Haralick features values as functions of acquisition duration, and for common image resolutions and reconstructions. Methods A homogeneous cylindrical phantom containing 9.6 kBq/ml Ge-68 was repeatedly imaged on a Siemens Biograph mCT, with acquisition durations ranging from three seconds to three hours. Images with 1.5, 2, and 4 mm isometrically spaced voxels were reconstructed with filtered back-projection (FBP), ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM), and the Siemens TrueX algorithm. We analysed Haralick features derived from differently quantized (3 to 8-bit) grey level co-occurrence matrices (GLCMs) as functions of exposure E, which we defined as the product of activity concentration in a volume of interest (VOI) and acquisition duration. The VOI was a 50 mm wide cube at the centre of the phantom. Feature stability was defined for df/dE → 0. Results The most stable feature values occurred in low resolution FBPs, whereas some feature values from 1.5 mm TrueX reconstructions ranged over two orders of magnitude. Within the same reconstructions, most feature value-exposure curves reached stable plateaus at similar exposures, regardless of GLCM quantization. With 8-bit GLCM, median time to stability was 16 s and 22 s for FBPs, 18 s and 125 s for OSEM, and 23 s, 45 s, and 76 s for PSF reconstructions, with longer durations for higher resolutions. Stable exposures coincided in OSEM and TrueX reconstructions with image noise distributions converging to a Gaussian. In FBP, the occurrence of stable values coincided the disappearance of negatives image values in the VOI. Conclusions Haralick feature values depend strongly on exposure, but invariance exists within defined domains of exposure. Here, we present an easily replicable procedure to identify said stable exposure domains, where image noise does not substantially add to textural feature values. Only by imaging at predetermined feature-invariant exposure levels and by adjusting exposure to expected activity concentrations, can textural features have a quantitative use in PET/CT. The necessary exposure levels are attainable by modern PET/CT systems in clinical routine.

[1]  W. Schottky Über spontane Stromschwankungen in verschiedenen Elektrizitätsleitern , 1918 .

[2]  H. Lilliefors On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown , 1967 .

[3]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[4]  Norbert J. Pelc,et al.  The noise power spectrum in computed X-ray tomography. , 1978 .

[5]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  L. Shepp,et al.  A Statistical Model for Positron Emission Tomography , 1985 .

[7]  Robert King,et al.  Textural features corresponding to textural properties , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[8]  Donald W. Wilson,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm. I. Theory , 1994 .

[9]  B. Tsui,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm: II. Monte Carlo simulations. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Jinyi Qi,et al.  A unified noise analysis for iterative image estimation. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Peter Van Roy,et al.  Concepts, Techniques, and Models of Computer Programming , 2004 .

[12]  Vladimir Y. Panin,et al.  Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Akinobu Shimizu,et al.  Medical image analysis of 3D CT images based on extension of Haralick texture features , 2008, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[14]  I. Poon,et al.  Automated radiation targeting in head-and-neck cancer using region-based texture analysis of PET and CT images. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  J. Humm,et al.  Using an external gating signal to estimate noise in PET with an emphasis on tracer avid tumors , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Tony Lindeberg,et al.  Generalized Gaussian Scale-Space Axiomatics Comprising Linear Scale-Space, Affine Scale-Space and Spatio-Temporal Scale-Space , 2011, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[17]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium. , 2010, Medical physics.

[18]  R. Jeraj,et al.  Variability of textural features in FDG PET images due to different acquisition modes and reconstruction parameters , 2010, Acta oncologica.

[19]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT. , 2010, Medical physics.

[20]  M. Hatt,et al.  Intratumor Heterogeneity Characterized by Textural Features on Baseline 18F-FDG PET Images Predicts Response to Concomitant Radiochemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  V. Bettinardi,et al.  Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690. , 2011, Medical physics.

[22]  M. Hatt,et al.  Reproducibility of Tumor Uptake Heterogeneity Characterization Through Textural Feature Analysis in 18F-FDG PET , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  Vicky Goh,et al.  Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging by texture analysis , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[24]  D. Robinson,et al.  Properties of Noise in Positron Emission Tomography Images Reconstructed with Filtered-Backprojection and Row-Action Maximum Likelihood Algorithm , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[25]  Jing Tang,et al.  Noise propagation in resolution modeled PET imaging and its impact on detectability , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Bernd Klaeser,et al.  Transconvolution and the virtual positron emission tomograph--a new method for cross calibration in quantitative PET∕CT imaging. , 2013, Medical physics.

[27]  A. Rahmim,et al.  Resolution modeling in PET imaging: theory, practice, benefits, and pitfalls. , 2013, Medical physics.

[28]  Eric J. W. Visser,et al.  FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0 , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[29]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Dependence of image quality on acquisition time for the PET/CT Biograph mCT. , 2014, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[30]  Robert J. Gillies,et al.  The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET Radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[31]  Fei Yang,et al.  Quantitative radiomics: impact of stochastic effects on textural feature analysis implies the need for standards , 2015, Journal of medical imaging.

[32]  Florent Tixier,et al.  The Impact of Optimal Respiratory Gating and Image Noise on Evaluation of Intratumor Heterogeneity on 18F-FDG PET Imaging of Lung Cancer , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[33]  Thomas Carlier,et al.  Revisiting the Robustness of PET-Based Textural Features in the Context of Multi-Centric Trials , 2016, PloS one.

[34]  M. Berndt,et al.  Isotope independent determination of PET/CT modulation transfer functions from phantom measurements on spheres. , 2016, Medical physics.

[35]  Jungsu S. Oh,et al.  Differentiating the grades of thymic epithelial tumor malignancy using textural features of intratumoral heterogeneity via 18F-FDG PET/CT , 2016, Annals of Nuclear Medicine.

[36]  Firas Mourtada,et al.  Effects of image noise, respiratory motion, and motion compensation on 3D activity quantification in count-limited PET images , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  Wolfgang Weber,et al.  Reliability of PET/CT Shape and Heterogeneity Features in Functional and Morphologic Components of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumors: A Repeatability Analysis in a Prospective Multicenter Cohort , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[38]  Martin A. Lodge,et al.  Impact of PET/CT system, reconstruction protocol, data analysis method, and repositioning on PET/CT precision: An experimental evaluation using an oncology and brain phantom , 2017, Medical physics.

[39]  T. Yoshiura,et al.  Texture analysis of FDG PET/CT for differentiating between FDG-avid benign and metastatic adrenal tumors: efficacy of combining SUV and texture parameters , 2017, Abdominal Radiology.

[40]  R. Boellaard,et al.  EANM/EARL harmonization strategies in PET quantification: from daily practice to multicentre oncological studies , 2017, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[41]  Arman Rahmim,et al.  The impact of image reconstruction settings on 18F-FDG PET radiomic features: multi-scanner phantom and patient studies , 2017, European Radiology.

[42]  Andreas Rimner,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Dynamic 18F-Fluoromisonidazole PET Data in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[43]  Technical Note: Transconvolution based equalization of positron energy effects for the use of 68Ge/68Ga phantoms in determining 18F PET recovery , 2017, Medical physics.

[44]  Geoffrey G. Zhang,et al.  Voxel size and gray level normalization of CT radiomic features in lung cancer , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[45]  L. Cozzi,et al.  Ability of FDG PET and CT radiomics features to differentiate between primary and metastatic lung lesions , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[46]  Irène Buvat,et al.  Radiomics in Nuclear Medicine Applied to Radiation Therapy: Methods, Pitfalls, and Challenges. , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[47]  E De Bernardi,et al.  PET textural features stability and pattern discrimination power for radiomics analysis: An "ad-hoc" phantoms study. , 2018, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[48]  V. Goh,et al.  Heterogeneity in tumours: Validating the use of radiomic features on 18F-FDG PET/CT scans of lung cancer patients as a prognostic tool. , 2019, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[49]  Cornelis H. Slump,et al.  Repeatability of 18F‐FDG PET radiomic features: A phantom study to explore sensitivity to image reconstruction settings, noise, and delineation method , 2018, Medical physics.

[50]  Alex Zwanenburg,et al.  Radiomics in nuclear medicine: robustness, reproducibility, standardization, and how to avoid data analysis traps and replication crisis , 2019, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[51]  Tommy Löfstedt,et al.  Gray-level invariant Haralick texture features , 2019, PloS one.