Towards guidelines to harmonize textural features in PET: Haralick textural features vary with image noise, but exposure-invariant domains enable comparable PET radiomics
暂无分享,去创建一个
P. Cumming | A. Rominger | T. Krause | G. Prenosil | T. Weitzel | M. Fürstner | M. Hentschel | B. Klaeser
[1] W. Schottky. Über spontane Stromschwankungen in verschiedenen Elektrizitätsleitern , 1918 .
[2] H. Lilliefors. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown , 1967 .
[3] Robert M. Haralick,et al. Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..
[4] Norbert J. Pelc,et al. The noise power spectrum in computed X-ray tomography. , 1978 .
[5] L. Shepp,et al. Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[6] L. Shepp,et al. A Statistical Model for Positron Emission Tomography , 1985 .
[7] Robert King,et al. Textural features corresponding to textural properties , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..
[8] Donald W. Wilson,et al. Noise properties of the EM algorithm. I. Theory , 1994 .
[9] B. Tsui,et al. Noise properties of the EM algorithm: II. Monte Carlo simulations. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.
[10] Jinyi Qi,et al. A unified noise analysis for iterative image estimation. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.
[11] Peter Van Roy,et al. Concepts, Techniques, and Models of Computer Programming , 2004 .
[12] Vladimir Y. Panin,et al. Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[13] Akinobu Shimizu,et al. Medical image analysis of 3D CT images based on extension of Haralick texture features , 2008, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..
[14] I. Poon,et al. Automated radiation targeting in head-and-neck cancer using region-based texture analysis of PET and CT images. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[15] J. Humm,et al. Using an external gating signal to estimate noise in PET with an emphasis on tracer avid tumors , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.
[16] Tony Lindeberg,et al. Generalized Gaussian Scale-Space Axiomatics Comprising Linear Scale-Space, Affine Scale-Space and Spatio-Temporal Scale-Space , 2011, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.
[17] Paul E Kinahan,et al. Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium. , 2010, Medical physics.
[18] R. Jeraj,et al. Variability of textural features in FDG PET images due to different acquisition modes and reconstruction parameters , 2010, Acta oncologica.
[19] Paul Kinahan,et al. Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT. , 2010, Medical physics.
[20] M. Hatt,et al. Intratumor Heterogeneity Characterized by Textural Features on Baseline 18F-FDG PET Images Predicts Response to Concomitant Radiochemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[21] V. Bettinardi,et al. Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690. , 2011, Medical physics.
[22] M. Hatt,et al. Reproducibility of Tumor Uptake Heterogeneity Characterization Through Textural Feature Analysis in 18F-FDG PET , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[23] Vicky Goh,et al. Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging by texture analysis , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[24] D. Robinson,et al. Properties of Noise in Positron Emission Tomography Images Reconstructed with Filtered-Backprojection and Row-Action Maximum Likelihood Algorithm , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.
[25] Jing Tang,et al. Noise propagation in resolution modeled PET imaging and its impact on detectability , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.
[26] Bernd Klaeser,et al. Transconvolution and the virtual positron emission tomograph--a new method for cross calibration in quantitative PET∕CT imaging. , 2013, Medical physics.
[27] A. Rahmim,et al. Resolution modeling in PET imaging: theory, practice, benefits, and pitfalls. , 2013, Medical physics.
[28] Eric J. W. Visser,et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0 , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[29] S. Schoenberg,et al. Dependence of image quality on acquisition time for the PET/CT Biograph mCT. , 2014, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.
[30] Robert J. Gillies,et al. The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET Radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis , 2015, Scientific Reports.
[31] Fei Yang,et al. Quantitative radiomics: impact of stochastic effects on textural feature analysis implies the need for standards , 2015, Journal of medical imaging.
[32] Florent Tixier,et al. The Impact of Optimal Respiratory Gating and Image Noise on Evaluation of Intratumor Heterogeneity on 18F-FDG PET Imaging of Lung Cancer , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[33] Thomas Carlier,et al. Revisiting the Robustness of PET-Based Textural Features in the Context of Multi-Centric Trials , 2016, PloS one.
[34] M. Berndt,et al. Isotope independent determination of PET/CT modulation transfer functions from phantom measurements on spheres. , 2016, Medical physics.
[35] Jungsu S. Oh,et al. Differentiating the grades of thymic epithelial tumor malignancy using textural features of intratumoral heterogeneity via 18F-FDG PET/CT , 2016, Annals of Nuclear Medicine.
[36] Firas Mourtada,et al. Effects of image noise, respiratory motion, and motion compensation on 3D activity quantification in count-limited PET images , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.
[37] Wolfgang Weber,et al. Reliability of PET/CT Shape and Heterogeneity Features in Functional and Morphologic Components of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumors: A Repeatability Analysis in a Prospective Multicenter Cohort , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[38] Martin A. Lodge,et al. Impact of PET/CT system, reconstruction protocol, data analysis method, and repositioning on PET/CT precision: An experimental evaluation using an oncology and brain phantom , 2017, Medical physics.
[39] T. Yoshiura,et al. Texture analysis of FDG PET/CT for differentiating between FDG-avid benign and metastatic adrenal tumors: efficacy of combining SUV and texture parameters , 2017, Abdominal Radiology.
[40] R. Boellaard,et al. EANM/EARL harmonization strategies in PET quantification: from daily practice to multicentre oncological studies , 2017, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[41] Arman Rahmim,et al. The impact of image reconstruction settings on 18F-FDG PET radiomic features: multi-scanner phantom and patient studies , 2017, European Radiology.
[42] Andreas Rimner,et al. Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Dynamic 18F-Fluoromisonidazole PET Data in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[43] Technical Note: Transconvolution based equalization of positron energy effects for the use of 68Ge/68Ga phantoms in determining 18F PET recovery , 2017, Medical physics.
[44] Geoffrey G. Zhang,et al. Voxel size and gray level normalization of CT radiomic features in lung cancer , 2018, Scientific Reports.
[45] L. Cozzi,et al. Ability of FDG PET and CT radiomics features to differentiate between primary and metastatic lung lesions , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[46] Irène Buvat,et al. Radiomics in Nuclear Medicine Applied to Radiation Therapy: Methods, Pitfalls, and Challenges. , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[47] E De Bernardi,et al. PET textural features stability and pattern discrimination power for radiomics analysis: An "ad-hoc" phantoms study. , 2018, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.
[48] V. Goh,et al. Heterogeneity in tumours: Validating the use of radiomic features on 18F-FDG PET/CT scans of lung cancer patients as a prognostic tool. , 2019, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[49] Cornelis H. Slump,et al. Repeatability of 18F‐FDG PET radiomic features: A phantom study to explore sensitivity to image reconstruction settings, noise, and delineation method , 2018, Medical physics.
[50] Alex Zwanenburg,et al. Radiomics in nuclear medicine: robustness, reproducibility, standardization, and how to avoid data analysis traps and replication crisis , 2019, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[51] Tommy Löfstedt,et al. Gray-level invariant Haralick texture features , 2019, PloS one.