Estimation of Acetabular Version from Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiograph Employing Deep Learning

Background and Objective: The Acetabular version, an essential factor in total hip arthroplasty, is measured by CT scan as the gold standard. The dose of radiation and expensiveness of CT make anterior-posterior pelvic radiograph an appropriate alternative procedure. In this study, we applied a deep learning approach on anteroposterior pelvic X-rays to measure anatomical version, eliminating the necessity of using Computed tomography scan. Methods: The right and left acetabular version angles of the hips of 300 patients are computed using their CT images. The proposed deep learning model, Attention on Pretrained-VGG16 for Bone Age, is applied to the AP images of the included population. The age and gender of these people are added as two other inputs to the last fully connected layer of attention mechanism. As the output, the angles of both hips are predicted. Results: The angles of hips computed on CT increase as people get older with the mean values of 16.54 and 16.11 (right and left angles) for men and 20.61 and 19.55 for women in our dataset. The predicted errors in the estimation of right and left angles using the proposed method of deep learning are in the accurate region of error (<=3 degrees) which shows the ability of the proposed method in measuring anatomical version based on AP images. Conclusion: The suggested algorithm, applying pre-trained vgg16 on the AP images of the pelvis of patients followed by an attention model considering age and gender of patients, can assess version accurately using only AP radiographs while obviating the need for CT scan. The applied technique of estimation of anatomical acetabular version based on AP pelvic images using DL approaches, to the best of authors’ knowledge, has not been published yet.

[1]  M. Schofer,et al.  Analysis of acetabular version: Retroversion prevalence, age, side and gender correlations , 2019, Journal of orthopaedic translation.

[2]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[3]  S. Incavo,et al.  The Anatomy of the Acetabulum: What is Normal? , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  Monan Wang,et al.  A review of computer‐assisted orthopaedic surgery systems , 2020, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[5]  Naoto Endo,et al.  Detecting intertrochanteric hip fractures with orthopedist-level accuracy using a deep convolutional neural network , 2018, Skeletal Radiology.

[6]  Hyunkwang Lee,et al.  Beyond Human Perception: Sexual Dimorphism in Hand and Wrist Radiographs Is Discernible by a Deep Learning Model , 2018, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[7]  Pauley Chea,et al.  Current applications and future directions of deep learning in musculoskeletal radiology , 2019, Skeletal Radiology.

[8]  Moritz Tannast,et al.  Prevalence of Femoral and Acetabular Version Abnormalities in Patients With Symptomatic Hip Disease: A Controlled Study of 538 Hips , 2018, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  H. Takashima,et al.  Three‐dimensional orientation of the acetabulum , 2017, Clinical anatomy.

[10]  A. Jaiman,et al.  Evaluation of version of acetabular component following total hip replacement on conventional radiograph and computed tomography , 2020 .

[11]  J. Mast,et al.  Recognizing Acetabular Version in the Radiographic Presentation of Hip Dysplasia , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  P. Rego,et al.  Measuring Acetabular Version after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Two Radiographic Methods , 2021, Revista brasileira de ortopedia.

[13]  M. Leunig,et al.  A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Machine Learning in Medical Imaging , 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[15]  H. Malchau,et al.  Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty , 2016, Acta orthopaedica.

[16]  D. Murray The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  Gregory Hager,et al.  Automated detection & classification of knee arthroplasty using deep learning. , 2019, The Knee.

[18]  Nima Tajbakhsh,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning? , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  R. Castelein,et al.  Non‐equivalent Results from Different Anteversion Measurements Methods for the Evaluation of the Acetabular Cup Orientation in Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2019, Orthopaedic surgery.

[20]  Timothy Dozat,et al.  Incorporating Nesterov Momentum into Adam , 2016 .

[21]  Peter Gluchowski,et al.  F , 1934, The Herodotus Encyclopedia.

[22]  Nobuhiko Sugano,et al.  Fully automatic estimation of pelvic sagittal inclination from anterior-posterior radiography image using deep learning framework , 2019, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[23]  Jenny Lee,et al.  Fully Automated Deep Learning System for Bone Age Assessment , 2017, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[24]  James H Thrall,et al.  Addressing overutilization in medical imaging. , 2010, Radiology.