Assessing practical laboratory skills in undergraduate molecular biology courses

This study explored a new strategy of assessing laboratory skills in a molecular biology course to improve: student effort in preparation for and participation in laboratory work; valid evaluation of learning outcomes; and students’ employment prospects through provision of evidence of their skills. Previously, assessment was based on written laboratory reports and examinations, not on the demonstration of practical skills per se. This action research project involved altering the assessment design so that a greater proportion of the marks was allocated to active participation and learning in the laboratory, partially replacing a single examination with direct observation of student participation and learning over a prolonged period of weekly laboratory sessions. We ascertained staff and students’ perceptions of the new assessment processes by means of a Likert scale questionnaire, student focus group and individual staff interviews. Overall, students and staff evaluated the new assessment structure positively, citing fairness, authenticity and reward for effort. Results also revealed the need for specific training of staff in this form of assessment and indicated staff–student ratios made assessment burdensome. Four out of five students reported that an increased awareness of the importance of practical laboratory skills stimulated them to greater efforts to achieve.

[1]  Philip Poronnik,et al.  Re-designing Science Pedagogy: Reversing the Flight from Science , 2008 .

[2]  V. Hu The Cell Cycle , 1994, GWUMC Department of Biochemistry Annual Spring Symposia.

[3]  Adnan Boyacı Authentic Learning Environments in Higher Education , 2006 .

[4]  D. Nicol,et al.  Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice , 2006 .

[5]  Lee S. Shulman,et al.  Counting and Recounting: Assessment and the Quest for Accountability , 2007 .

[6]  E. Boyer Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate , 1990 .

[7]  Lynne Hunt,et al.  Planning for a sustainable academic future , 2009 .

[8]  Student appeals of grades: a comparative study of university policies and practices , 2011 .

[9]  D. Myrhaug,et al.  Identifying and promoting self‐regulated learning in higher education: roles and responsibilities of student tutors , 2008 .

[10]  D. Sluijsmans,et al.  The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review , 1999 .

[11]  Lynne Hunt,et al.  Closing the loop: a case study of a post-evaluation strategy , 2009 .

[12]  Lynne Hunt,et al.  The realities of change in higher education: interventions to promote learning and teaching , 2006 .

[13]  L. Hunt Authentic Learning at Work , 2006 .

[14]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[15]  Jan Herrington,et al.  Authentic Learning Environments In Higher Education , 2005 .

[16]  Linda A. Suskie Assessing Student Learning: A Common Sense Guide , 2004 .

[17]  Pascal de Caprariis,et al.  Constructivism in online learning: A view from the science faculty , 2000 .

[18]  Beverley Oliver,et al.  Capturing stakeholder perceptions of graduate capability development: challenges associated with graduate employability indicators , 2010 .

[19]  Michael G. Gunzenhauser EDUCATION REVIEW , 2006 .

[20]  Vidar Gynnild,et al.  Promoting academic integrity at a Midwestern University: Critical review and current challenges , 2008 .