PROTECT: Prospective Phase-II-Trial Evaluating Adaptive Proton Therapy for Cervical Cancer to Reduce the Impact on Morbidity and the Immune System

Simple Summary Chemoradiation with photon radiotherapy is very effective as a locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) treatment. However, the majority of women with LACC experience treatment-related toxicity involving the gastrointestinal and urogenital tracts and the immune system. Compared to that of photon therapy, proton therapy substantially reduces undesired dose to the organs around the tumor, leading to a decrease in radiotherapy-related side-effects. At present, few studies on proton therapy in patients with LACC will be conducted. The PROTECT trial aims to evaluate the differences in side effects between photon therapy and proton therapy, both combined with chemotherapy, for LACC. Fifteen patients will be enrolled per treatment group. Information will be collected on the differences in dose to the organs around the tumor, treatment-related side effects, and the impact on the immune system. This information will be used to assess the potential of proton therapy as an innovative treatment for LACC. Abstract External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with concurrent chemotherapy followed by brachytherapy is a very effective treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). However, treatment-related toxicity is common and reduces the patient’s quality of life (QoL) and ability to complete treatment or undergo adjuvant therapies. Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) enables a significant dose reduction in organs at risk (OAR), when compared to that of standard intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). However, clinical studies evaluating whether IMPT consequently reduces side effects for LACC are lacking. The PROTECT trial is a nonrandomized prospective multicenter phase-II-trial comparing clinical outcomes after IMPT or IMRT/VMAT in LACC. Thirty women aged >18 years with a histological diagnosis of LACC will be included in either the IMPT or IMRT/VMAT group. Treatment includes EBRT (45 Gy in 25 fractions of 1.8 Gy), concurrent five weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2), and 3D image (MRI)-guided adaptive brachytherapy. The primary endpoint is pelvic bones Dmean and mean bowel V15Gy. Secondary endpoints include dosimetric parameters, oncological outcomes, health-related QoL, immune response, safety, and tolerability. This study provides the first data on the potential of IMPT to reduce OAR dose in clinical practice and improve toxicity and QoL for patients with LACC.

[1]  M. Hoogeman,et al.  Correlations between bone marrow radiation dose and hematologic toxicity in locally advanced cervical cancer patients receiving chemoradiation with cisplatin: a systematic review. , 2021, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  V. Lemmens,et al.  No improvement in survival of older women with cervical cancer-A nationwide study. , 2021, European journal of cancer.

[3]  C. Kirisits,et al.  MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer (EMBRACE-I): a multicentre prospective cohort study. , 2021, The Lancet. Oncology.

[4]  N. Horeweg,et al.  Adjuvant Systemic Therapy after Chemoradiation and Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2021, Cancers.

[5]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries , 2021, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  W. Matysiak,et al.  Inter-fraction motion robustness and organ sparing potential of proton therapy for cervical cancer. , 2020, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  J. Zhao,et al.  Pelvic bone marrow sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy reduces the incidence of the hematologic toxicity of patients with cervical cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial , 2020, Radiation oncology.

[8]  N. Horeweg,et al.  Efficacy and toxicity of chemoradiation with image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer , 2019, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[9]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Physician assessed and patient reported urinary morbidity after radio-chemotherapy and image guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. , 2018, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  Richard Pötter,et al.  The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Cervical Cancer , 2018, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[11]  S. Both,et al.  Proton Therapy Reduces Normal Tissue Dose in Extended-Field Pelvic Radiation for Endometrial Cancer. , 2018, International journal of particle therapy.

[12]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  The EMBRACE II study: The outcome and prospect of two decades of evolution within the GEC-ESTRO GYN working group and the EMBRACE studies , 2018, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.

[13]  J. Debus,et al.  Prospective phase-II-study evaluating postoperative radiotherapy of cervical and endometrial cancer patients using protons – the APROVE-trial , 2017, Radiation Oncology.

[14]  M. Hoogeman,et al.  Dynamics of patient reported quality of life and symptoms in the acute phase of online adaptive external beam radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. , 2017, Gynecologic oncology.

[15]  G. Sanguineti,et al.  Patient-reported intestinal toxicity from whole pelvis intensity-modulated radiotherapy: First quantification of bowel dose-volume effects. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  E. M. Pedersen,et al.  Risk Factors for Pelvic Insufficiency Fractures in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Following Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. , 2017, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  S. H. van der Burg,et al.  Impact of (chemo)radiotherapy on immune cell composition and function in cervical cancer patients , 2016, Oncoimmunology.

[18]  Steven van de Water,et al.  Which cervical and endometrial cancer patients will benefit most from intensity-modulated proton therapy? , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  M. Mehta,et al.  Proton radiotherapy for gynecologic neoplasms , 2016, Acta oncologica.

[20]  M. Mehta,et al.  A systematic review of the cost and cost‐effectiveness studies of proton radiotherapy , 2016, Cancer.

[21]  N. Taku,et al.  Initial Report of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Posthysterectomy Patients With Gynecologic Cancer. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  Zhiyong Yang,et al.  Correlations Between Radiation Dose in Bone Marrow and Hematological Toxicity in Patients With Cervical Cancer: A Comparison of 3DCRT, IMRT, and RapidARC , 2016, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[23]  Richard Pötter,et al.  Health-Related Quality of Life in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients After Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy Including Image Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy: An Analysis From the EMBRACE Study. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  L. Gormsen,et al.  Impact of radiation dose and standardized uptake value of (18)FDG PET on nodal control in locally advanced cervical cancer , 2015, Acta oncologica.

[25]  I. Rutten,et al.  Improved survival of patients with cervical cancer treated with image-guided brachytherapy compared with conventional brachytherapy. , 2014, Gynecologic oncology.

[26]  Luiza Bondar,et al.  Clinical implementation of an online adaptive plan-of-the-day protocol for nonrigid motion management in locally advanced cervical cancer IMRT. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  Tsair-Fwu Lee,et al.  The Different Dose-Volume Effects of Normal Tissue Complication Probability Using LASSO for Acute Small-Bowel Toxicity during Radiotherapy in Gynecological Patients with or without Prior Abdominal Surgery , 2014, BioMed research international.

[28]  M. Moerland,et al.  Clinical outcome and dosimetric parameters of chemo-radiation including MRI guided adaptive brachytherapy with tandem-ovoid applicators for cervical cancer patients: a single institution experience. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[29]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Clinical outcome of protocol based image (MRI) guided adaptive brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[30]  John C Roeske,et al.  Normal tissue complication probability modeling of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  X Allen Li,et al.  Radiation dose-volume effects in the stomach and small bowel. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[32]  John C Roeske,et al.  Dosimetric predictors of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent cisplatin and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[33]  Y. Shioyama,et al.  Long-term results of proton beam therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[34]  H. Tsujii,et al.  Clinical results of fractionated proton therapy. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[35]  H. Tsujii,et al.  High‐energy proton beam radiation therapy for gynecologic malignancies. Potential of proton beam as an alternative to brachytherapy , 1991, Cancer.