Impact of Hip and Vertebral Fractures on Quality-Adjusted Life Years

Abstract: The objective of the study was to estimate the impact of hip and vertebral fractures on quality of life in postmenopausal women using a preference-based health measure that is appropriate for economic evaluations and to investigate correlates of health outcome. Interviews to assess health-related quality of life, which also documented other health conditions and characteristics, were undertaken in women age 50 years and older without osteoporotic fractures compared with women with hip and/or vertebral fracture(s). Health status was characterized by self-reported physical limitations and the mental and physical component summary scores of the SF-36. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), which reflect each individual’s assessment of her overall health utility, were estimated with time tradeoff values. Regression methods were used to examine QALY correlates (e.g. time since fracture) for each fracture group and to estimate differences in QALYs between fracture and non-fracture subjects after accounting for other patient characteristics. Among 382 women ages 50–96 years, fracture subjects were significantly older, less likely to use hormone replacement therapy and more likely to report physical limitations than non-fracture subjects. On the QALY scale, where 1 represents perfect health and 0 represents death, mean QALY values were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.87) among 114 women with one or more vertebral fractures and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.74) among 67 with hip fracture compared with 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.94) among 201 women without fracture. No significant correlates of QALYs were identified among women with vertebral fracture alone. Among hip fracture subjects, time since hip fracture and presence of a vertebral fracture were significant correlates of QALYs. In multiple regression analyses, estimated QALY differences (fracture minus non-fracture subjects) ranged from –0.05 to –0.55 and were equivalent to losses of 20–58 days, 23–65 days and 115–202 days per year for vertebral fracture (p= 0.001), hip fracture (p= 0.009) and hip plus vertebral fracture (p<0.001) subjects, respectively, depending on age. Thus to adequately assess the cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis treatment, the negative impact of vertebral fractures on QALYs, even among women who have survived a hip fracture, must be considered.

[1]  O Johnell,et al.  The socioeconomic burden of fractures: today and in the 21st century. , 1997, The American journal of medicine.

[2]  R. Klein,et al.  The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes study , 1993, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[3]  C. Cooper,et al.  Vertebral Fractures Predict Subsequent Fractures , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[4]  D. Gold,et al.  Association of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with impaired functional status. , 1993, The American journal of medicine.

[5]  D. Gold,et al.  Managing patients with complications of osteoporosis. , 1998, Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America.

[6]  G. Torrance Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. , 1986, Journal of health economics.

[7]  R. Prince,et al.  A Case–Control Study of Quality of Life and Functional Impairment in Women with Long–Standing Vertebral Osteoporotic Fracture , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[8]  C. Cooper,et al.  The crippling consequences of fractures and their impact on quality of life. , 1997, The American journal of medicine.

[9]  W Sumner,et al.  U-titer: a utility assessment tool. , 1991, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[10]  P. Dolan,et al.  Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. , 1997, Medical care.

[11]  L. Melton,et al.  Who Has Osteoporosis? A Conflict Between Clinical and Public Health Perspectives , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  L. Melton,et al.  History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project. , 1996, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[13]  H. Raspe,et al.  Health Impact Associated with Vertebral Deformities: Results from the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (EVOS) , 1998, Osteoporosis International.

[14]  H. Minne,et al.  Time since Vertebral Fracture: An Important Variable Concerning Quality of Life in Patients with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[15]  C C Glüer,et al.  Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators. , 1999, JAMA.

[16]  R. Cumming,et al.  Quality of life related to fear of falling and hip fracture in older women: a time trade off study. , 2000, BMJ.

[17]  George W. Torrance,et al.  Application of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory to Measure Social Preferences for Health States , 1982, Oper. Res..

[18]  M. Mcgrath Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 1998 .

[19]  C. Cooper,et al.  Health‐Related Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Women With Low BMD With or Without Prevalent Vertebral Fractures , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[20]  H K Genant,et al.  Contribution of vertebral deformities to chronic back pain and disability , 1992, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[21]  J. Larson The MOS 36-Item Short form Health Survey , 1997, Evaluation & the health professions.

[22]  D. Felsenberg,et al.  Number and Type of Vertebral Deformities: Epidemiological Characteristics and Relation to Back Pain and Height Loss , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[23]  W H Rogers,et al.  Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. , 1995, Medical care.

[24]  Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Executive summary. , 1998, Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA.

[25]  S. Cummings,et al.  The Association of Radiographically Detected Vertebral Fractures with Back Pain and Function: A Prospective Study , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[26]  R. Deyo,et al.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[27]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Has the impact of hormone replacement therapy on health-related quality of life been undervalued? , 2000, Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine.

[28]  L. Melton,et al.  Cost-Effective Treatment Strategies for Osteoporosis , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[29]  P Tugwell,et al.  A review of economic evaluation in osteoporosis. , 1999, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[30]  S. Silverman,et al.  Deterioration in Quality of Life Following Hip Fracture: A Prospective Study , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[31]  A. Williams EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .

[32]  A. Tosteson Quality of Life in the Economic Evaluation of Osteoporosis Prevention and Treatment , 1997, Spine.

[33]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .