Comments on "A mass-conservative switching algorithm for modeling fluid flow in variably saturated porous media, K. Sadegh Zadeh, Journal of Computational Physics, 230 (2011)"

Simulating coupled soil-aquifer systems are recently of great scientific interests and need, particularly in terms of getting a correct water exchange between regional climate and terrestrial surface/subsurface water body to predict the future changes in water resources for a sustainable agricultural production and drinking water coverage in areas with increasing aridification. The Richards equation has been widely used in simulating water flow processes in coupled soil-aquifer systems. It has been expressed in three standard forms: i) the pressure head-based form (h-based form) with pressure head as primary variable, ii) the saturation-based form with saturation as primary variable, and iii) the mixed form, in which either pressure or saturation can be chosen as primary variable [1,3,8]. Besides of the saturation-based form, the h-based and the mixed form which use the pressure head as the primary variable can be applied in the unsaturated zone and saturated zone simultaneously [2,6,8]. The mixed form is preferred by several researchers because it conserves mass more precisely [1,2,9], whereas the h-based form often leads to large mass-balance errors for highly non-linear problems such as infiltration into initially dry soil [1,2,9]. In the recent past Sadegh Zadeh [10] stated that the mixed form cannot be applied in the saturated zone: “. . . it is only applicable in unsaturated zones”. Based on this assumption, he proposed a switching algorithm which uses the mixed form of Richards equation in the unsaturated zone and switches to the h-based form in and near the saturated zone based on a threshold value of pressure head (−2.5 cm). The author concluded that this algorithm was designed to produce “rapid convergence for saturated and unsaturated regions for all types of initial and boundary conditions”.

[1]  François Lehmann,et al.  Comparison of Iterative Methods for Improved Solutions of the Fluid Flow Equation in Partially Saturated Porous Media , 1998 .

[2]  G. Vachaud,et al.  Experimental and numerical study of a transient, two‐dimensional unsaturated‐saturated water table recharge problem , 1979 .

[3]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  Adaptive time stepping and error control in a mass conservative numerical solution of the mixed form of Richards equation | NOVA. The University of Newcastle's Digital Repository , 2001 .

[4]  Pierre Perrochet,et al.  On the primary variable switching technique for simulating unsaturated–saturated flows , 1999 .

[5]  M. Celia,et al.  A General Mass-Conservative Numerical Solution for the Unsaturated Flow Equation , 1990 .

[6]  Kouroush Sadegh Zadeh A mass-conservative switching algorithm for modeling fluid flow in variably saturated porous media , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[7]  Fred J. Molz,et al.  A physically based, two-dimensional, finite-difference algorithm for modeling variably saturated flow , 1994 .

[8]  Olaf Kolditz,et al.  Parallel Finite Element Method and Time Stepping Control for Non-Isothermal Poro-Elastic Problems , 2011 .

[10]  Xinmei Hao,et al.  A mass-conservative switching method for simulating saturated–unsaturated flow , 2005 .

[11]  R. G. Hills,et al.  Modeling one‐dimensional infiltration into very dry soils: 1. Model development and evaluation , 1989 .

[12]  Sabine Attinger,et al.  Modeling Soil‐Coupled Water Uptake of Multiple Root Systems with Automatic Time Stepping , 2011 .

[13]  Special I Ssue,et al.  OpenGeoSys: an open-source initiative for numerical simulation of thermo-hydro-mechanical/chemical (THM/C) processes in porous media , 2012 .