Comparison of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Women with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease from the CE-MARC Trial

Background — Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in women and under-diagnosis contributes to their high mortality. This study compared the gender-specific diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Methods and Results — 235 females and 393 males with suspected angina underwent CMR, SPECT and X-ray angiography as part of the CE-MARC study. CMR comprised adenosine stress/rest perfusion, cine imaging, late gadolinium enhancement and MR coronary angiography. Gated adenosine stress/rest SPECT was performed using 99m Tc-tetrofosmin. For CMR, the sensitivity in females and males was similar (88.7% vs. 85.6%, p=0.57), as was the specificity (83.5% vs. 82.8%, p=0.86). For SPECT, the sensitivity was significantly worse in females than males (50.9% vs. 70.8%, p=0.007), but specificities were similar (84.1% vs. 81.3%; p=0.48). Sensitivity in both female and male groups was significantly higher with CMR than SPECT (p<0.0001 for both) but specificity was similar (p=0.77 and 1.00 respectively). For perfusion-only components, CMR outperformed SPECT in females (area under curve [AUC]: 0.90 vs. 0.67, p<0.0001) and in males (AUC: 0.89 vs. 0.74, p<0.0001). Diagnostic accuracy was similar in both sexes with perfusion CMR (p=1.00), but significantly worse in females with SPECT (p<0.0001). CMR. n cccritititereriaii wwwererre as prprevevevioioioususulylyy pppubuublilishshsheded 1111,1122 . ThThhee e stststudududy yy wawaas ss apapappprprovovovededd bbby y ththheee lololocacaal ll eetethihihicscsc cccommmmimimittttteeeee aaandndnd ccomommplpliieiedd d with the Decclalaararaatitiiononon ooof f HeHeelslslsinininkikiki (((2020200000).).). PaPaPatititenenentstst ppprororovivdededed d d inininfofoformrmrmededd wwwriririttttttenenen cconononsesesentntn.. CCCararrdidiiovovovasasscuuulalar rr mmamagngngnetetetic rreessononanancec and d sisingnlele-p-phootoon ememiissiionon ccomompuputetd toomomogrgrapphyh foor r didiagagnonosiss ofof ccororonnarary hehearat didisesasse e (C(CE-E-MARC): a ppproroospspspececectititivevee tttrialalal.. . Superior didiiagaggnnostic pperererfoformrmrmanancecece ooofff pepeprfrffusususioioion-n-cacacardrdrioioovavavascsculullaarr mmagagagnenenetititic rereresosoonananancncceee vevrsrsususus SSSPEPEPCTCTT tttooo dededetetect coorooonanry arterry y diddssseasasse:e TTThhehe ssseececononnddadarryy eendppopointss oof thhheee mumuulttticiceenntteer r mmuullttivvenenendodor r MRMRMR-I-IIMMPMPACACACT III (MMMagneticc RRessonnanncece Imamaagigiingng fororr MMMyyyocaaardddial PPeererfufuusisisioonon AAAsseeessssmennnt iinin CCCoororonoarrryy AArrteeery DiDiseseseasassee e TrTrriaiaial)ll).. MMMagagagnnn ReResososonnn TaTaTassksk FFororrcecec oon CCCoomommittee to o UUpUdadatetee thehehe 11199999977 ExExExeerercciisee Teeestting GGGuiddedellilinenees).).) aratitclle:e:e aa iriricacaan oofof TaTasssk ooonnn (((CoCoCommmmmmitititteteee

[1]  G. Heller,et al.  Gender differences in the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: A bivariate meta-analysis , 2013, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[2]  J. Schwitter,et al.  Superior diagnostic performance of perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus SPECT to detect coronary artery disease: The secondary endpoints of the multicenter multivendor MR-IMPACT II (Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary Artery Disease Trial) , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[3]  M. Motwani,et al.  High-resolution versus standard-resolution cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[4]  Hyuk-Jae Chang,et al.  Comparison of stress perfusion MRI and SPECT for detection of myocardial ischemia in patients with angiographically proven three-vessel coronary artery disease. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  M. Sculpher,et al.  Clinical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in coronary heart disease: The CE-MARC study , 2009, Trials.

[6]  V. Hombach,et al.  Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance first pass perfusion imaging is equally potent in female compared to male patients with coronary artery disease , 2009, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[7]  R. Kim,et al.  Value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress perfusion testing for the detection of coronary artery disease in women. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[8]  A. van Rossum,et al.  MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. , 2008, European heart journal.

[9]  Guido Germano,et al.  Combined quantitative supine-prone myocardial perfusion spect improves detection of coronary artery disease and normalcy rates in women , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[10]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part I: gender differences in traditional and novel risk factors, symptom evaluation, and gender-optimized diagnostic strategies. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  S. Reis,et al.  Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part II: gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, and outcome with regard to gender-based pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Thomas Mills,et al.  National Study of Physician Awareness and Adherence to Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Guidelines , 2005, Circulation.

[13]  C Fraser,et al.  Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and economic evaluation, of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction. , 2004, Health technology assessment.

[14]  R. Redberg,et al.  Diagnosis and treatment of coronary heart disease in women: systematic reviews of evidence on selected topics. , 2003, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[15]  K. Bailey,et al.  Effects of adjustment for referral bias on the sensitivity and specificity of single photon emission computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. , 2002, The American journal of medicine.

[16]  Matthew Wright,et al.  Graphical analysis of bra size calculation procedures , 2002 .

[17]  Harlan M. Krumholz,et al.  Sex-Based Differences in Early Mortality after Myocardial Infarction , 1999 .

[18]  J. Soler‐Soler,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of technetium-99m-MIBI myocardial SPECT in women and men. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  J. Heo,et al.  Detection of coronary artery disease in women with use of stress single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging , 1997, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[20]  D. Crabbe,et al.  Lower diagnostic accuracy of thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in women: an effect of smaller chamber size. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  R. Pettigrew,et al.  The importance of work-up (verification) bias correction in assessing the accuracy of SPECT thallium-201 testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[23]  W. Kannel,et al.  Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population. , 1986, American heart journal.

[24]  F. Harrell,et al.  Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography. Multivariable analysis. , 1984, The American journal of medicine.

[25]  R A Greenes,et al.  Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias. , 1983, Biometrics.

[26]  G. Diamond A clinically relevant classification of chest discomfort. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.