Perception of the duration of rapid spectrum changes in speech and nonspeech signals

For a number of years, investigators have studied the effects one acoustic segment has on the perception of other acoustic segments. In one recent study, Miller and Liberman (Perception & Psychophysics, 1979,25, 457–465) reported that overall syllable duration influences the location of the labeling boundary between the stop [bl and the semivowel [w]. They interpreted this “context effect” as reflecting a form of perceptual normalization whereby the listener readjusts his perceptual apparatus to take account of the differences in rate of articulation of the talker. In the present paper, we report the results of several comparisons between speech and nonspeech control signals. We observed comparable context effects for perception of the duration of rapid spectrum changes as a function of overall duration of the stimulus with both speech and nonspeech signals. The results with nonspeech control signals therefore call into question the earlier claims of Miller and Liberman by demonstrating clearly that context effects are not peculiar to the perception of speech signals or to normalization of speaking rate. Rather, such context effects may simply reflect general psychophysical principles that influence the perceptual categorization and discrimination of all acoustic signals, whether speech or nonspeech.

[1]  H. Lane,et al.  THE MOTOR THEORY OF SPEECH PERCEPTION: A CRITICAL REVIEW. , 1965, Psychological review.

[2]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[3]  D. Pisoni Identification and discrimination of the relative onset time of two component tones: implications for voicing perception in stops. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Speech perception: a model of acoustic–phonetic analysis and lexical access , 1979 .

[5]  A. Liberman,et al.  Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer , 1980 .

[7]  P D Eimas,et al.  Contextual effects in infant speech perception. , 1980, Science.

[8]  J. L. Miller Contextual effects in the discrimination of stop consonant and semivowel , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Discimination of relative onset time of two-component tones by infants. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Q. Summerfield Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Discrimination of voice onset time by human infants: new findings and implications for the effects of early experience. , 1981, Child development.

[12]  J L Miller,et al.  How the components of speaking rate influence perception of phonetic segments. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Speech perception without traditional speech cues. , 1981, Science.

[14]  J. L. Miller Some Effects of Speaking Rate on Phonetic Perception , 1981, Phonetica.

[15]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Some experiments on perceptual learning of mirror-image acoustic patterns , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  A. Liberman On Finding That Speech Is Special , 1982 .

[17]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Studies on the categorization of speech by infants , 1983, Cognition.

[18]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Infants' discrimination of the duration of a rapid spectrum change in nonspeech signals. , 1983, Science.