Assessing Public Perceptions of Computer-Based Models

ABSTRACTAlthough there is a solid body of research on both collaborative decision-making and on processes using models, there is little research on general public attitudes about models and their use in making policy decisions. This project assessed opinions about computer models in general and attitudes about a specific model being used in water planning in the Middle Rio Grande Region of New Mexico, United States. More than 1000 individuals were surveyed about their perceptions of computer-based models in general. Additionally, more than 150 attendees at public meetings related to the Middle Rio Grande planning effort were surveyed about their perceptions of the specific Rio Grande-based model. The results reveal that the majority of respondents are confident in their ability to understand models and most believe that models are appropriate tools for education and for making policy decisions. Responses also reveal that trust in who develops a model is a key issue related to public support. Regarding the specific model highlighted in this project, the public revealed tremendous support for its usefulness as a public engagement tool as well as a tool to assist decision-makers in regional water planning. Although indicating broad support for models, the results do raise questions about the role of trust in using models in contentious decisions.

[1]  Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen,et al.  Air Quality Management in UK Local Authorities: Public Understanding and Participation , 2002 .

[2]  Desmond Saunders-Newton,et al.  “But the Computer Said!” , 2001 .

[3]  Stephen H. Conrad,et al.  System dynamics modeling for community-based water planning: Application to the Middle Rio Grande , 2004, Aquatic Sciences.

[4]  Lynn E. Johnson.  COMPUTER-AIDED PLANNING FOR MULTIPLE-PURPOSE RESERVOIR OPERATING POLICIES , 1990 .

[5]  Jac A. M. Vennix,et al.  Group model building effectiveness: a review of assessment studies † , 2002 .

[6]  Robert Costanza,et al.  The 4P Approach to Dealing with Scientific Uncertainty , 1992 .

[7]  K. Stave.  A system dynamics model to facilitate public understanding of water management options in Las Vegas, Nevada. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  Simon Peck,et al.  Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics , 1996, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[9]  Steven Yearley,et al.  Computer Models and the Public's Understanding of Science , 1999 .

[10]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[11]  J Swanson,et al.  Business Dynamics—Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[12]  T. Hellström,et al.  Uncertainty and values: The case of environmental impact assessment , 1996 .

[13]  Ryan C. Atwell.  Mediated Modeling: A System Dynamics Approach to Environmental Consensus Building , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[14]  Matthias Ruth,et al.  Using Dynamic Modeling to Scope Environmental Problems and Build Consensus , 1998, Environmental management.

[15]  John W. Labadie,et al.  Computerized Decision Support Systems for Water Managers , 1986 .

[16]  Thomas G. West,et al.  Who Owns the Eighteenth Century?@@@Vindicating the Founders: Race, Sex, Class, and Justice in the Origins of America@@@A Necessary Evil: A History of American Distrust of Government , 2000 .

[17]  Hon.  Proceedings of the 20th anniversary conference: Water management in the '90s. A time for innovation , 1993 .

[18]  A. Ford.  Modeling the Environment: An Introduction To System Dynamics Modeling Of Environmental Systems , 1999 .

[19]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Book review : Group model building : facilitating team learning using system dynamics , 1998 .