Characterization of shaking intensity distribution and seismic assessment of RC buildings for the Kashmir (Pakistan) earthquake of October 2005

Abstract On October 8, 2005, an earthquake of magnitude M w 7.6 shook northern Pakistan particularly the Kashmir region. With nearly 73,000 dead, 70,000 injured, 270,000 buildings destroyed, and 180,000 damaged, the earthquake ranks amongst the worst natural disasters in the history of Pakistan and the Indian subcontinent. In this paper, the shaking intensity distribution of the affected region is reconstructed using the limited ground motion data available. Selection of a suite of records representative of characteristics of the Kashmir earthquake at locations of major damage is undertaken. An ensemble of buildings is collated which represents (i) actual Pakistan reinforced concrete design, (ii) general non-seismic and (iii) code-conforming buildings with different levels of detailing. The buildings are subjected to the selected records, including the vertical component of the earthquake ground motion thought to be significant in this earthquake. Conclusions are drawn with regard to the relative performance of the different types of building investigated, the effect of different levels of design and detailing, and the effect of the vertical earthquake component on damage. It is observed that buildings that are seismically designed to contemporary codes would have survived the earthquake. However, the vertical motion would have caused significant reduction of shear capacity in vertical members. The extensive results reported in the paper are useful for practicing engineers operating in areas of high seismicity where limited seismic design and construction quality control exist, as well as code drafting panels interested in the effect of multi-axial excitation on reinforced concrete buildings.

[1]  A W Beeby,et al.  CONCISE EUROCODE FOR THE DESIGN OF CONCRETE BUILDINGS. BASED ON BSI PUBLICATION DD ENV 1992-1-1: 1992. EUROCODE 2: DESIGN OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES. PART 1: GENERAL RULES AND RULES FOR BUILDINGS , 1993 .

[2]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Analysis of the damage potential of the Kocaeli (Turkey) earthquake of 17 August 1999 , 2000 .

[3]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data , 2003 .

[4]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  ESTIMATION OF RESPONSE SPECTRA AND PEAK ACCELERATIONS FROM WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN EARTHQUAKES: AN INTERIM REPORT PART 2 , 1993 .

[5]  J. Douglas,et al.  Equations for the Estimation of Strong Ground Motions from Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Using Data from Europe and the Middle East: Horizontal Peak Ground Acceleration and Spectral Acceleration , 2005 .

[6]  Douglas A. Foutch,et al.  Dynamic behaviour of R/C highway bridges under the combined effect of vertical and horizontal earthquake motions , 1991 .

[7]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  PROCEDURE AND SPECTRA FOR ANALYSIS OF RC STRUCTURES SUBJECTED TO STRONG VERTICAL EARTHQUAKE LOADS , 1997 .

[8]  J. Bommer,et al.  THE EFFECTIVE DURATION OF EARTHQUAKE STRONG MOTION , 1999 .

[9]  Marios K. Chryssanthopoulos,et al.  Seismic Reliability of RC Frames with Uncertain Drift and Member Capacity , 1999 .

[10]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Earthquake spectra and design , 1982 .

[11]  E. L. Krinitzsky,et al.  State-of-the-art for assessing earthquake hazards in the United States. Report 8, Duration, spectral content, and predominant period of strong motion earthquake records from Western United States , 1977 .

[12]  D. H. Lee,et al.  Zeus NL - A System for Inelastic Analysis of Structures , 2004 .

[13]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Empirical Ground-Motion Relations for Subduction-Zone Earthquakes and Their Application to Cascadia and Other Regions , 2003 .

[14]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure , 2006 .

[15]  H. Thio,et al.  Attenuation Relations of Strong Ground Motion in Japan Using Site Classification Based on Predominant Period , 2006 .

[16]  Aman Mwafy.  Seismic performance of code designed RC buildings , 2001 .

[17]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Analysis of the failure of interstate 10 freeway ramp during the Northridge earthquake of 17 January 1994 , 1995 .

[18]  K. Campbell,et al.  Updated Near-Source Ground-Motion (Attenuation) Relations for the Horizontal and Vertical Components of Peak Ground Acceleration and Acceleration Response Spectra , 2003 .

[19]  W. Silva,et al.  Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relationships for Subduction Zone Earthquakes , 1997 .

[20]  James L Noland,et al.  Computer-Aided Structural Engineering (CASE) Project: Decision Logic Table Formulation of ACI (American Concrete Institute) 318-77 Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete for Automated Constraint Processing. Volume 1. , 1986 .

[21]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  ANALYTICAL ASSESSMENT OF AN IRREGULAR RC FRAME FOR FULL-SCALE 3D PSEUDO-DYNAMIC TESTING PART I: ANALYTICAL MODEL VERIFICATION , 2005 .

[22]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Seismic Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Columns , 1994 .

[23]  Yong Lu,et al.  Probabilistic Drift Limits and Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Columns , 2005 .

[24]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  A PROCEDURE FOR COMBINING VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL SEISMIC ACTION EFFECTS , 2001 .

[25]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Fragility analysis of flat-slab structures , 2004 .

[26]  A. Elnashai,et al.  ANALYTICAL AND FIELD EVIDENCE OF THE DAMAGING EFFECT OF VERTICAL EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION , 1996 .