Optimising the visual feedback technique for improving upright stance maintenance by delaying its display: behavioural effects on healthy adults.

The visual feedback technique (VFB) is recognized by several studies as a valuable tool for re-establishing the balance functions. However, one former study has highlighted the fact that the increased control induced by this technique infer both favourable (the amplitudes of the horizontal motions of the centre of gravity (CoG(h)) are diminished) and unfavourable features (the vertical difference between the CoG(h) motions and centre of pressure (CoP) trajectories are enhanced). One means to decrease these CoP-CoG(v) motions is to delay their display on the screen of the monitor. To assess these behavioural effects, 16 healthy adults were evaluated with various delays from 0 to 1200 ms. CoP displacements, measured through a force platform, were decomposed into two elementary motions: CoG(h) and the difference CoP-CoG(v). A fractional Brownian motion modelling of these motions allowed to determine from which distance and for how long the corrective process takes over and to what extent the motion is controlled. Compared to the VFB real time condition, increasing the delay induces some effects mainly on the CoP-CoG(v) motions which are largely diminished, the most striking effect appearing for delays exceeding 600 ms. Despite the lower forces these reduced amplitudes infer to control body sways, the amplitudes of the CoG(h) motions tend to increase slightly. Considered as a whole, whilst retaining the beneficial aspects of VFB without delay and significantly suppressing the unfavourable features, the data suggests that the method of delaying the screen display optimises the VFB technique.

[1]  D. Winter,et al.  Unified theory regarding A/P and M/L balance in quiet stance. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Patrice Rougier,et al.  Visual feedback induces opposite effects on elementary centre of gravity and centre of pressure minus centre of gravity motions in undisturbed upright stance. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  M. Woollacott,et al.  The effects of two types of cognitive tasks on postural stability in older adults with and without a history of falls. , 1997, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[4]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Proprioceptive, visual and vestibular thresholds for the perception of sway during standing in humans. , 1994, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  Robert J. Peterka,et al.  Postural control model interpretation of stabilogram diffusion analysis , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[6]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Cognitive influence on postural stability: a neuromuscular analysis in young and older adults. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[7]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Visual Influences on Center of Pressure Dynamics in Upright Posture , 1998 .

[8]  P. Rougier,et al.  Backward and forward leaning postures modelled by an fBm framework , 2001, Neuroscience Research.

[9]  Michelle Fleury,et al.  Availability of visual and proprioceptive afferent messages and postural control in elderly adults , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  G. Wannstedt,et al.  Use of augmented sensory feedback to achieve symmetrical standing. , 1978, Physical therapy.

[11]  P. Rougier,et al.  Center of Gravity Motions and Ankle Joint Stiffness Control in Upright Undisturbed Stance Modeled Through a Fractional Brownian Motion Framework , 2000, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  G. Somjen,et al.  FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CELL SIZE IN SPINAL MOTONEURONS. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  P. Rougier,et al.  Adaptative effects of loss of vision on upright undisturbed stance , 2000, Brain Research.

[14]  A M Wing,et al.  Age differences in postural stability are increased by additional cognitive demands. , 1996, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[15]  A. Shumway-cook,et al.  Postural sway biofeedback: its effect on reestablishing stance stability in hemiplegic patients. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  Y Brenière,et al.  Estimating the centre of gravity of the body on the basis of the centre of pressure in standing posture. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  P. Rougier Influence of visual feedback on successive control mechanisms in upright quiet stance in humans assessed by fractional Brownian motion modelling , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[18]  Y Brenière,et al.  Are dynamic phenomena prior to stepping essential to walking? , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  D. Winter,et al.  Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  P Rougier,et al.  Automatic determination of the transition between successive control mechanisms in upright stance assessed by modelling of the centre of pressure. , 1999, Archives of physiology and biochemistry.

[21]  J. Collins,et al.  Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: A random-walk analysis of center-of-pressure trajectories , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  A Cappello,et al.  An improved technique for the extraction of stochastic parameters from stabilograms. , 2000, Gait & posture.

[23]  Y. Brenière Why we walk the way we do. , 1996, Journal of motor behavior.

[24]  J P Burke,et al.  Balance Retraining in a Hemiparetic Patient Using Center of Gravity Biofeedback: A Single-Case Study , 1998, Perceptual and motor skills.

[25]  B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractional Brownian Motions, Fractional Noises and Applications , 1968 .