Investigations into the applicability of adaptive finite element methods to two‐dimensional infinite Prandtl number thermal and thermochemical convection

An adaptive finite element procedure is presented for improving the quality of solutions to convection-dominated problems in geodynamics. The method adapts the mesh automatically around regions of high solution gradient, yielding enhanced resolution of the associated flow features. The approach requires the coupling of an automatic mesh generator, a finite element flow solver, and an error estimator. In this study, the procedure is implemented in conjunction with the well-known geodynamical finite element code ConMan. An unstructured quadrilateral mesh generator is utilized, with mesh adaptation accomplished through regeneration. This regeneration employs information provided by an interpolation-based local error estimator, obtained from the computed solution on an existing mesh. The technique is validated by solving thermal and thermochemical problems with well-established benchmark solutions. In a purely thermal context, results illustrate that the method is highly successful, improving solution accuracy while increasing computational efficiency. For thermochemical simulations the same conclusions can be drawn. However, results also demonstrate that the grid-based methods employed for simulating the compositional field are not competitive with the other methods (tracer particle and marker chain) currently employed in this field, even at the higher spatial resolutions allowed by the adaptive grid strategies.

[1]  P. Fullsack An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian formulation for creeping flows and its application in tectonic models , 1995 .

[2]  I. Babuska,et al.  A‐posteriori error estimates for the finite element method , 1978 .

[3]  Paul J. Tackley,et al.  Testing the tracer ratio method for modeling active compositional fields in mantle convection simulations , 2003 .

[4]  T. Hughes,et al.  MULTI-DIMENSIONAL UPWIND SCHEME WITH NO CROSSWIND DIFFUSION. , 1979 .

[5]  J. T. Ratcliff,et al.  Mantle plume heads and the initiation of plate tectonic reorganizations , 1998 .

[6]  Marie-Pierre Doin,et al.  A comparison of methods for the modeling of thermochemical convection , 1997 .

[7]  Louis Moresi,et al.  Role of temperature‐dependent viscosity and surface plates in spherical shell models of mantle convection , 2000 .

[8]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  An adaptive finite element method for high speed compressible flow , 1985 .

[9]  Shijie Zhong,et al.  Constraints on thermochemical convection of the mantle from plume heat flux, plume excess temperature, and upper mantle temperature , 2006 .

[10]  L. Bodri,et al.  Numerical investigation of tectonic flow in island-arc areas , 1978 .

[11]  Adrian Lenardic,et al.  A NUMERICAL TREATMENT OF GEODYNAMIC : VISCOUS FLOW PROBLEMS INVOLVING THE ADVECTION OF MATERIAL INTERFACES , 1993 .

[12]  N. Weiss,et al.  Convection in the earth's mantle: towards a numerical simulation , 1974, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Adaptive mesh generation for fluid mechanics problems , 2000 .

[14]  D. Stevenson,et al.  Physical model of source region of subduction zone volcanics , 1992 .

[15]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  A simple error estimator and adaptive procedure for practical engineerng analysis , 1987 .

[16]  E. Cuthill,et al.  Reducing the bandwidth of sparse symmetric matrices , 1969, ACM '69.

[17]  G. Nielson The side-vertex method for interpolation in triangles☆ , 1979 .

[18]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Adaptive grid refinement for the Euler and compressible Navier-Stokes equations , 1984 .

[19]  J. Davies,et al.  Numerical investigation of layered convection in a three‐dimensional shell with application to planetary mantles , 2004 .

[20]  M. Richards,et al.  Thermal entrainment and melting in mantle plumes , 1995 .

[21]  Paul J. Tackley,et al.  Effects of strongly variable viscosity on three‐dimensional compressible convection in planetary mantles , 1996 .

[22]  U. Christensen,et al.  Channeling of plume flow beneath mid-ocean ridges , 2001 .

[23]  Leszek Demkowicz,et al.  Adaptive finite elements for flow problems with moving boundaries. part I: Variational principles and a posteriori estimates , 1984 .

[24]  D. Helmberger,et al.  Dynamics of a phase change at the base of the mantle consistent with seismological observations , 1999 .

[25]  J. A. George Computer implementation of the finite element method , 1971 .

[26]  E Probert,et al.  Grid Control and Adaptation , 1998 .

[27]  Manfred Koch,et al.  A benchmark comparison for mantle convection codes , 1989 .

[28]  C. R. Hagelberg,et al.  Mantle circulation models with variational data assimilation: inferring past mantle flow and structure from plate motion histories and seismic tomography , 2001 .

[29]  Bradford H. Hager,et al.  Conman: vectorizing a finite element code for incompressible two-dimensional convection in the Earth's mantle , 1990 .

[30]  David A. Yuen,et al.  Are mantle plumes adiabatic , 2001 .

[31]  John R. Baumgardner,et al.  Three-dimensional treatment of convective flow in the earth's mantle , 1985 .

[32]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Adaptive remeshing for compressible flow computations , 1987 .

[33]  S. Lo A NEW MESH GENERATION SCHEME FOR ARBITRARY PLANAR DOMAINS , 1985 .

[34]  Perumal Nithiarasu,et al.  An adaptive finite element procedure for solidification problems , 2000 .

[35]  M. Fortin,et al.  Anisotropic mesh adaptation : Theory, validation and applications , 1996 .

[36]  D. Pelletier,et al.  Adaptive finite element method for mixed convection , 1995 .

[37]  Nigel P. Weatherill,et al.  Hybrid methods for electromagnetic scattering simulations on overlapping grids , 2003 .

[38]  J. Peiro,et al.  Unstructured finite element mesh generation and adaptive procedures for CFD , 1990 .

[39]  J. Peraire,et al.  Mesh generation and adaptivity for the solution of compressible viscous high speed flows , 1995 .

[40]  Rainald Löhner,et al.  Mesh adaptation in fluid mechanics , 1995 .