The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow‐up of 5 years
暂无分享,去创建一个
L. Egevad | P. Wiklund | T. Nyberg | G. Steineck | P. Sooriakumaran | S. Carlsson | O. Akre | C. Adding | M. Jonsson | A. Hosseini | M. Olsson | A. Ploumidis | A. Nilsson | L. Haendler
[1] A. Tewari,et al. Corrigendum re: "effect of a risk-stratified grade of nerve-sparing technique on early return of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy" [Eur Urol 2013;63:438-44]. , 2015, European urology.
[2] S. Goldenberg,et al. Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy: AUA/ASTRO Guideline. , 2013, The Journal of urology.
[3] A. Tewari,et al. Effect of a risk-stratified grade of nerve-sparing technique on early return of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2013, European urology.
[4] A. Jemal,et al. Cancer statistics, 2013 , 2013, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.
[5] L. Egevad,et al. Biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a European single-centre cohort with a minimum follow-up time of 5 years. , 2012, European urology.
[6] M. Gleave,et al. Positive surgical margins are a risk factor for significant biochemical recurrence only in intermediate‐risk disease , 2012, BJU international.
[7] Markus Graefen,et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. , 2012, European urology.
[8] Ashutosh Tewari,et al. Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. , 2012, European urology.
[9] K. Palmer,et al. Anatomic grading of nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. , 2012, European urology.
[10] Ashutosh Tewari,et al. Systematic review of methods for reporting combined outcomes after radical prostatectomy and proposal of a novel system: the survival, continence, and potency (SCP) classification. , 2012, European urology.
[11] J. Epstein,et al. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center. , 2012, Human pathology.
[12] A. Hoznek,et al. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate‐specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment‐naïve patients , 2011, BJU international.
[13] Steven L. Chang,et al. Length of site‐specific positive surgical margins as a risk factor for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy , 2011, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.
[14] A. Tewari,et al. Dorsal vein complex control after apical dissection results in low apical positive surgical margins, but other surgical maneuvers are required to optimize early continence recovery. , 2011, European urology.
[15] A. Partin,et al. Tumor grade at margins of resection in radical prostatectomy specimens is an independent predictor of prognosis. , 2010, Urology.
[16] L. Kiemeney,et al. The length of positive surgical margins correlates with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy , 2010, Histopathology.
[17] M. Kattan,et al. Location, extent and number of positive surgical margins do not improve accuracy of predicting prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2009, The Journal of urology.
[18] A. Shalhav,et al. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence. , 2009, The Journal of urology.
[19] S. Pahernik,et al. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression? , 2008, BJU international.
[20] P. Troncoso,et al. Natural history of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy based on length of a positive margin. , 2008, Urology.
[21] P. Scardino,et al. Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2007, Urology.
[22] R. Montironi,et al. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2007, Human pathology.
[23] James O Peabody,et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. , 2007, European urology.
[24] Sam S. Chang,et al. Impact of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy. , 2006, Urology.
[25] T. H. van der Kwast,et al. The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer. , 2006, European urology.
[26] B. Laven,et al. Karolinska prostatectomy: A robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique , 2006, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.
[27] P. Walsh,et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. , 2005, The Journal of urology.
[28] L. Cheng,et al. The influence of extent of surgical margin positivity on prostate specific antigen recurrence , 2005, Journal of Clinical Pathology.
[29] M. Kattan,et al. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2005, The Journal of urology.
[30] T. Tsuzuki,et al. Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression. , 2004, Urology.
[31] E. Bergstralh,et al. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy , 2002, Cancer.
[32] K. Hamilton-Nelson,et al. Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression. , 2002, The Journal of urology.
[33] D. Lubeck,et al. Predicting disease recurrence in intermediate and high-risk patients undergoing radical prostatectomy using percent positive biopsies: results from CaPSURE. , 2002, Urology.
[34] A W Partin,et al. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. , 1999, JAMA.
[35] M. Kattan,et al. Hazard rates for progression after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. , 1997, Urology.
[36] M. Kattan,et al. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 1995, The Journal of urology.
[37] B. Guillonneau,et al. Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: outlining the problem and its long-term consequences. , 2009, European urology.
[38] Kevin C Zorn,et al. The Will Rogers phenomenon in urological oncology. , 2008, The Journal of urology.
[39] M. Soloway,et al. Prostate specific antigen recurrence rates are low after radical retropubic prostatectomy and positive margins. , 2006, The Journal of urology.