Intermittent Animal Behavior: The Adjustment-Deployment Dilemma

Intermittency is ubiquitous in animal behavior. We depict a coordination problem that is part of the more general structure of intermittent adaptation: the adjustment-deployment dilemma. It captures the intricate compromise between the time spent in adjusting a response and the time used to deploy it: The adjustment process improves fitness with time, but during deployment fitness of the solution decays as environmental conditions change. We provide a formal characterization of the dilemma, and solve it using computational methods. We find that the optimal solution always results in a high intermittency between adjustment and deployment around a non-maximal fitness value. Furthermore we show that this non-maximal fitness value is directly determined by the ratio between the exponential coefficient of the fitness increase during adjustment and that of its decay coefficient during deployment. We compare the model results with experimental data obtained from observation and measurement of intermittent behavior in animals. Among other phenomena, the model is able to predict the uneven distribution of average duration of search and motion phases found among various species such as fishes, birds, and lizards. Despite the complexity of the problem, it can be shown to be solved by relatively simple mechanisms. We find that a model of a single continuous-time recurrent neuron, with the same parametric configuration, is capable of solving the dilemma for a wide set of conditions. We finally hypothesize that many of the different patterns of intermittent behavior found in nature might respond to optimal solutions of complexified versions of the adjustment-deployment dilemma under different constraints.

[1]  Thomas Collett,et al.  A toad's devious approach to its prey: A study of some complex uses of depth vision , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[2]  C. Cannon,et al.  Comparative locomotor ecology of gibbons and macaques: selection of canopy elements for crossing gaps. , 1994, American journal of physical anthropology.

[3]  D. J. Bond,et al.  The movement patterns of lacertid lizards: speed, gait and pauses in Lacerta vivipara , 1987 .

[4]  Mathieu Coppey,et al.  A stochastic theory for the intermittent behaviour of foraging animals , 2005 .

[5]  Manuel Glez Bedia,et al.  The adjustment-deployment dilemma in organism's behaviour: Theoretical characterization and minimal model , 2011, 2011 IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life (ALIFE).

[6]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  The Dynamics of Brain–Body–Environment Systems , 2008 .

[7]  Massimo Vergassola,et al.  ‘Infotaxis’ as a strategy for searching without gradients , 2007, Nature.

[8]  John G Milton,et al.  On-off intermittency in a human balancing task. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[9]  Andy Clark,et al.  The Dynamical Challenge , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  David W. Stephens,et al.  Saltatory search: a theoretical analysis , 1997 .

[11]  G. Sonerud,et al.  Search tactics of a pause-travel predator: adaptive adjustments of perching times and move distances by hawk owls (Surnia ulula) , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  J. Schall,et al.  Neural selection and control of visually guided eye movements. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  Yuichi Nakamura,et al.  Approximation of dynamical systems by continuous time recurrent neural networks , 1993, Neural Networks.

[14]  B. Evans,et al.  Flexible search tactics and efficient foraging in saltatory searching animals , 1989, Oecologia.

[15]  J. Videler,et al.  Energetic advantages of burst-and-coast swimming of fish at high speeds. , 1982, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  Daniel Campos,et al.  Optimal intermittence in search strategies under speed-selective target detection. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[17]  A. Tye,et al.  A Model of Search Behaviour for the Northern Wheatear Oenanthe oenanthe (Aves, Turdidae) and Other Pause-travel Predators , 2010 .

[18]  Stanley J. Rosenschein,et al.  A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction , 1996 .

[19]  Dorothea Heiss-Czedik,et al.  An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. , 1997, Artificial Life.

[20]  R. Warner,et al.  Dynamic games and field experiments examining intra- and intersexual conflict: explaining counterintuitive mating behavior in a Mediterranean wrasse, Symphodus ocellatus , 2000 .

[21]  W. J. O'brien,et al.  A Reevaluation of the Search Cycle of Planktivorous Arctic Graylings Thymallus arcticus , 1988 .

[22]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  Modeling Group Foraging: Individual Suboptimality, Interference, and a Kind of Matching , 2001, Adapt. Behav..

[23]  M. Duffy,et al.  Selective Predation and Productivity Jointly Drive Complex Behavior in Host‐Parasite Systems , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[24]  M. Moreau,et al.  Intermittent search strategies , 2011, 1104.0639.

[25]  D. Kramer,et al.  The Behavioral Ecology of Intermittent Locomotion1 , 2001 .

[26]  Sean R Eddy,et al.  What is dynamic programming? , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  T. Gelder,et al.  What Might Cognition Be, If Not Computation? , 1995 .