Changes in the EGFR amplification and EGFRvIII expression between paired primary and recurrent glioblastomas.

BACKGROUND The efficacy of novel targeted therapies is often tested at the time of tumor recurrence. However, for glioblastoma (GBM) patients, surgical resections at recurrence are performed only in a minority of patients; therefore, molecular data are predominantly derived from the initial tumor. Molecular data of the initial tumor for patient selection into personalized medicine trials can therefore be used only when the specific genetic change is retained in the recurrent tumor. METHODS In this study we determined whether EGFR amplification and expression of the most common mutation in GBMs (EGFRvIII) is retained at tumor recurrence. Because retention of genetic changes may be dependent on the initial treatment, we only used a cohort of GBM samples that were uniformly treated according to the current standard of care (ie, chemo-irradiation with temozolomide). RESULTS Our data show that, in spite of some quantitative differences, the EGFR amplification status remains stable in the majority (84%) of tumors evaluated. EGFRvIII expression remained similar in 79% of GBMs. However, within the tumors expressing EGFRvIII at initial diagnosis, approximately one-half lose their EGFRvIII expression at tumor recurrence. CONCLUSIONS The relative stability of EGFR amplification indicates that molecular data obtained in the primary tumor can be used to predict the EGFR status of the recurrent tumor, but care should be taken in extrapolating EGFRvIII expression from the primary tumor, particularly when expressed at first diagnosis.

[1]  J. C. Love,et al.  EGFR variant heterogeneity in glioblastoma resolved through single-nucleus sequencing. , 2014, Cancer discovery.

[2]  M. J. van den Bent,et al.  A phase 1 study evaluating ABT-414 in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) for subjects with recurrent or unresectable glioblastoma (GBM). , 2014 .

[3]  M. Choti,et al.  Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Early- and Late-Stage Human Malignancies , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[4]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Mutational Analysis Reveals the Origin and Therapy-Driven Evolution of Recurrent Glioma , 2014, Science.

[5]  S. Nelson,et al.  Targeted Therapy Resistance Mediated by Dynamic Regulation of Extrachromosomal Mutant EGFR DNA , 2014, Science.

[6]  D. Haussler,et al.  The Somatic Genomic Landscape of Glioblastoma , 2013, Cell.

[7]  J. Pollack,et al.  EGFRvIII gene rearrangement is an early event in glioblastoma tumorigenesis and expression defines a hierarchy modulated by epigenetic mechanisms , 2013, Oncogene.

[8]  M. J. van den Bent,et al.  Intrinsic molecular subtypes of glioma are prognostic and predict benefit from adjuvant procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine chemotherapy in combination with other prognostic factors in anaplastic oligodendroglial brain tumors: a report from EORTC study 26951. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  M. Nikiforova,et al.  Paradoxical Relationship Between the Degree of EGFR Amplification and Outcome in Glioblastomas , 2012, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[10]  R. Stupp,et al.  New prognostic factors and calculators for outcome prediction in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a pooled analysis of EORTC Brain Tumour Group phase I and II clinical trials. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[11]  Paul S Mischel,et al.  Differential sensitivity of glioma- versus lung cancer-specific EGFR mutations to EGFR kinase inhibitors. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[12]  Debyani Chakravarty,et al.  Intratumoral heterogeneity of receptor tyrosine kinases EGFR and PDGFRA amplification in glioblastoma defines subpopulations with distinct growth factor response , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Rebecca A Betensky,et al.  Mosaic amplification of multiple receptor tyrosine kinase genes in glioblastoma. , 2011, Cancer cell.

[14]  L. Ricci-Vitiani,et al.  Expression of EGFRvIII in glioblastoma: prognostic significance revisited. , 2011, Neoplasia.

[15]  Raymond Sawaya,et al.  Immunologic escape after prolonged progression-free survival with epidermal growth factor receptor variant III peptide vaccination in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Andrew P. Stubbs,et al.  Intrinsic gene expression profiles of gliomas are a better predictor of survival than histology. , 2009, Cancer research.

[17]  M. J. van den Bent,et al.  Randomized phase II trial of erlotinib versus temozolomide or carmustine in recurrent glioblastoma: EORTC brain tumor group study 26034. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  D. Busam,et al.  An Integrated Genomic Analysis of Human Glioblastoma Multiforme , 2008, Science.

[19]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system , 2007, Acta Neuropathologica.

[20]  Martin J. van den Bent,et al.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  C. James,et al.  Analysis of genomic rearrangements associated with EGRFvIII expression suggests involvement of Alu repeat elements. , 2000, Neuro-oncology.

[22]  L. Lin,et al.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. , 1989, Biometrics.

[23]  Webster K. Cavenee,et al.  WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. 4th Ed. , 2007 .

[24]  D. Louis WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system , 2007 .

[25]  Allan H Friedman,et al.  Phase II trial of gefitinib in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.