Examining online public discourse in context: A mixed method approach

The Internet is often praised for its ability to provide a space to enable every person to present her or his view, thus (potentially) allowing for more inclusion and participation in the public discussion. This potential has led many scholars to examine online discussions and see what these can contribute to democracy and the public sphere. These investigations, however, often focus on a single aspect of online discourse: the actual content. It is important to realise that discourse is not constructed in a vacuum: in addition to the text, there is the environment in which the text is produced and consumed as well as the wider social practice to which it belongs. Every instance of language use, including that of online political communication, is a communicative event that consists of three dimensions: the text; the “discursive practice which involves the production and consumption of texts”; and the social practice (Jorgensen & Philips 2002, 68). Though important, the discursive and social practices are often neglected in studies of online political communication. The potential of the Internet for opening up public discourse cannot be fully evaluated if the context in which it is produced is ignored and if issues of power involved in this context are not addressed. In this article I introduce an integrated approach that looks at all three of the aforementioned dimensions of online public discourse from a critical discourse analytical perspective. The proposed mixed method approach allows for an examination and evaluation of the discourse in context, thus broadening the scope of explorations.

[1]  Tamara Witschge,et al.  Online deliberation : Possibilities of the Internet for deliberative democracy , 2004 .

[2]  T. V. Dijk,et al.  Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Volume 2. , 1997 .

[3]  G. Johnson Internet Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social and Behavioural Sciences , 2003 .

[4]  Fiona Stewart,et al.  Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online , 2000 .

[5]  Hans Wiklund,et al.  A Habermasian analysis of the deliberative democratic potential of ICT-enabled services in Swedish municipalities , 2005, New Media Soc..

[6]  Deborah Dubartell,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication: Human-to-Human Communication across the Internet , 2006 .

[7]  J. Richardson Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis , 2007 .

[8]  Nicholas W. Jankowski,et al.  The promise and practice of public debate in cyberspace , 2000 .

[9]  K. Brants,et al.  Politics is E-verywhere , 2002 .

[10]  S. Coleman,et al.  Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation , 2001 .

[11]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language , 1995 .

[12]  Kieron O'Hara,et al.  The Internet: A Tool for Democratic Pluralism? , 2002 .

[13]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley,et al.  Diversity of Political Conversation on the Internet: Users' Perspectives , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  J. Torfing New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek , 1999 .

[15]  Peter Dahlgren The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation , 2005 .

[16]  Andrew Ó. Baoill Slashdot and the Public Sphere , 2000, First Monday.

[17]  Ragnar Andreas Audunson,et al.  Technology and Social Inclusion. Rethinking the Digital Divide , 2006, J. Documentation.

[18]  John Street,et al.  Remote Control? Politics, Technology and `Electronic Democracy' , 1997 .

[19]  Pepi Leistyna Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis , 2001 .

[20]  Antje Gimmler Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the internet , 2001 .

[21]  J. Weigård,et al.  Understanding Habermas: Communicative Action and Deliberative Democracy , 2004 .

[22]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .

[23]  R. Koopmans Movements and media: Selection processes and evolutionary dynamics in the public sphere , 2004 .

[24]  N. Fairclough Language and power (2nd ed.) , 2001 .

[25]  Bahire Efe Özad,et al.  The Internet And The Public Sphere , 2005 .

[26]  M. M. Ferree,et al.  Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States , 2002 .

[27]  Eliza Tanner Chilean conversations : Internet forum participants debate Augusto Pinochet's detention , 2001 .

[28]  William Wresch,et al.  Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[29]  Simeon Yates,et al.  Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis , 2001 .

[30]  M. Jørgensen,et al.  Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method , 2002 .

[31]  Kees Brants,et al.  Guest Editor's Introduction: The Internet and the Public Sphere , 2005 .

[32]  R. Kies,et al.  Online Forums and Deliberative Democracy , 2005 .

[33]  R. Wodak What CDA is about – a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. , 2001 .

[34]  Henry Jenkins,et al.  Democracy and new media , 2004 .

[35]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups , 2004, New Media Soc..

[36]  J. Jensen Public Spheres on the Internet: Anarchic or Government‐Sponsored – A Comparison , 2003 .

[37]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley,et al.  New Voices in the Public Sphere: A Comparative Analysis of Interpersonal and Online Political Talk , 2002 .

[38]  S. Reeves,et al.  Discourse Analysis , 2018, The Study of Language.

[39]  Heather Savigny,et al.  Public Opinion, Political Communication and the Internet , 2002 .

[40]  John Gastil,et al.  Is Face-to-Face Citizen Deliberation a Luxury or a Necessity? , 2000 .

[41]  Lincoln Dahlberg,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and The Public Sphere: A Critical Analysis , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[42]  N. Fairclough Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. , 2001 .

[43]  Teun A. van Dijk,et al.  Discourse as structure and process , 1997 .

[44]  S. Wyatt,et al.  SHAPING CYBERSPACE : INTERPRETING AND TRANSFORMING THE INTERNET , 1999 .

[45]  James P. Ignizio,et al.  Foreword , 1996, Comput. Oper. Res..

[46]  Zizi Papacharissi The virtual sphere , 2002, New Media Soc..

[47]  Liza Tsaliki Online Forums and the Enlargement of Public Space: Research Findings from a European Project , 2002 .