Behavioural intentions of using virtual reality in learning: perspectives of acceptance of information technology and learning style

The use of virtual reality (VR) has become a viable alternative to conventional learning methods in various knowledge domains. Wearable head-mounted displays (HMDs) are devices that provide users with an immersive VR experience. To investigate the direct determinants affecting students’ reasons for HMD use in learning, hypotheses relating to information technology acceptance and Kolb’s learning styles were proposed and tested in this study. Participants were recruited through stratified random sampling according to the population ratio of colleges at a university in Taiwan. Students were shown a video on VR applications in learning, after which an online survey was completed. In total, 387 questionnaires were collected of which 376 were valid. An inference analysis of the samples was performed by structural equation modelling with eight exogenous latent variables, namely the four constructs of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) and the four modes of Kolb’s learning styles. All eight variables pointed to one endogenous latent variable: behavioural intention. The results showed all four constructs of the UTAUT to have a positive and significant effect on students’ behavioural intention to use HMDs in learning and only the concrete experience mode of Kolb’s learning styles to have a positive and significant effect. Based on these findings, this study provides suggestions on how to encourage HMDs use in learning to VR developers and educational institutions.

[1]  Nolan Ung,et al.  Utilizing virtual and augmented reality for educational and clinical enhancements in neurosurgery , 2017, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[2]  Robert F. Easley,et al.  Research Note - How Does Personality Matter? Relating the Five-Factor Model to Technology Acceptance and Use , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Jan Noyes,et al.  Explaining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: a multi-group analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2014, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[4]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Going beyond intention: Integrating behavioral expectation into the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[6]  Nabeel Salih Ali,et al.  REVIEW OF VIRTUAL REALITY TRENDS (PREVIOUS, CURRENT, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS), AND THEIR APPLICATIONS, TECHNOLOGIES AND TECHNICAL ISSUES , 2017 .

[7]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[8]  Hanoch Hauptman,et al.  The synergetic effect of learning styles on the interaction between virtual environments and the enhancement of spatial thinking , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Charles D. Barrett.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[10]  R. Stine,et al.  Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[11]  S. Karau,et al.  The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement , 2011 .

[12]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Adoption of Mobile Devices/Services — Searching for Answers with the UTAUT , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[13]  Jin-young Kim.  Effects of Personality Traits and Kolb Learning Styles on Learning Outcomes in a Blended Learning Environment , 2013 .

[14]  Rajiv Kishore,et al.  How robust is the UTAUT instrument?: a multigroup invariance analysis in the context of acceptance and use of online community weblog systems , 2006, SIGMIS CPR '06.

[15]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[16]  Wendy L. Jordanov.  An Examination of the Relationship between Learning Style and Technology Use. , 2001 .

[17]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[18]  J.M.F. ten Berge.  Review. Nunnally, J.C., and Bernstein, I.H. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, XXIV + 752 pgs. , 1995 .

[19]  Brett E. Shelton,et al.  Design and Development of Virtual Reality: Analysis of Challenges Faced by Educators , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[20]  Y. Tao,et al.  Using UTAUT to explore the behavior of 3G mobile communication users , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[21]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  An Empirical Examination of Individual Traits as Antecedents to Computer Anxiety and Computer Self-Efficacy , 2002, MIS Q..

[22]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding user evaluations of information systems , 1995 .

[23]  D. Jonassen.  Transforming Learning with Technology: Beyond Modernism and Post-Modernism or Whoever Controls the Technology Creates the Reality. , 2000 .

[24]  Jens Volkert,et al.  omVR-A Safety Training System for a Virtual Refinery , 1999 .

[25]  Mau-Tsuen Yang,et al.  A Collaborative Virtual Environment for Situated Language Learning Using VEC3D , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[26]  D. Kolb.  The learning style inventory: technical manual , 1976 .

[27]  Antonieta Ângulo,et al.  Immersive Simulation of Architectural Spatial Experiences , 2013 .

[28]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[29]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[30]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience , 1995 .

[31]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[32]  Allison W. Pearson,et al.  Five-factor model personality traits as predictors of perceived and actual usage of technology , 2015, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[34]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding Web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task value , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[35]  P. Schaik.  Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use for Websites Used by Students in Higher Education , 2009 .

[36]  Ruey-Shiang Shaw,et al.  A study of the relationships among learning styles, participation types, and performance in programming language learning supported by online forums , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[37]  Lawrence H. Wortzel,et al.  New Life-Style Determinants of Women's Food Shopping Behavior , 1979 .

[38]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[39]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[40]  D. Kolb,et al.  Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education , 2005 .

[41]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[43]  Joar Vittersø,et al.  Personality and technology acceptance: the influence of personality factors on the core constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2013, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[44]  M. Appelbaum,et al.  Psychometric methods. , 1989, Annual review of psychology.

[45]  V. Barone,et al.  Immersive virtual reality in computational chemistry: Applications to the analysis of QM and MM data , 2016, International journal of quantum chemistry.

[46]  Koun-Tem Sun,et al.  A study on learning effect among different learning styles in a Web-based lab of science for elementary school students , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[47]  Eleftherios Alamanos,et al.  Website design quality and usage behavior: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2014 .

[48]  Carla Ruiz-Mafé,et al.  Exploring individual personality factors as drivers of M-shopping acceptance , 2009, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[49]  Ravi Chinta,et al.  Assessing Experiential Learning Styles: A Methodological Reconstruction and Validation of the Kolb Learning Style Inventory , 2013 .

[50]  Emad AbuShanab,et al.  Internet Banking and Customers' Acceptance in Jordan: The Unified Model's Perspective , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Miltiadis D. Lytras,et al.  Virtual reality in learning, collaboration and behaviour: content, systems, strategies, context designs , 2016, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[52]  Chang Liu,et al.  An Application of the UTAUT Model for Understanding Student Perceptions Using Course Management Software , 2007, Communications of the IIMA.

[53]  D. Kayes.  Internal Validity and Reliability of Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory Version 3 (1999) , 2005 .

[54]  S. C. Huang,et al.  Learning styles and formative assessment strategy: enhancing student achievement in Web-based learning , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[55]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[56]  S. Terrell.  The effect of learning style on doctoral course completion in a Web-based learning environment , 2002, Internet High. Educ..

[57]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..