A study of hepatocellular carcinoma using morphometric and densitometric image analysis.

Hepatocellular carcinoma is often difficult to diagnose in cytologic material and biopsy specimens. To demonstrate the utility of image analysis in discriminating benign and malignant hepatocytes, 42 malignant cell groups were compared with 26 benign cell groups with a wide range of nuclear morphology in hematoxylin and eosin-stained histologic sections from 42 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Nuclear measurements were performed with a relatively inexpensive microcomputer-based image analysis system using a highly flexible imaging software package. Twenty-two nuclear morphometric and densitometric parameters were evaluated. The best single discriminator of benign and malignant cells was the nuclear major axis. Classification of the test samples using optimized linear discriminant functions achieved the following positive predictive values (PV+) and negative predictive values (PV-) for hepatocellular carcinoma: 95.0% PV+ and 85.7% PV- for the major axis; 90.5% PV+ and 84.6% PV- for five densitometric parameters; 100% PV+ and 86.7% PV- for three morphometric parameters; and 95.5% PV+ and 100% PV- for nine combined morphometric/densitometric parameters. These results demonstrate that multivariate linear discriminant functions of nuclear features measured by image analysis can be used to classify benign and malignant hepatocytes accurately.

[1]  J. Gil,et al.  Computerized interactive morphometry as an aid in the diagnosis of pleural effusions. , 1987, Acta cytologica.

[2]  Greene Ca,et al.  Some cytologic features of hepatocellular carcinoma as seen in fine needle aspirates. , 1984 .

[3]  H. Hsu,et al.  Cytophotometric measurements of nuclear DNA content in hepatocellular carcinomas , 1987, Hepatology.

[4]  E. Hudson,et al.  Liver aspiration in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in the Gambia. , 1985, Journal of clinical pathology.

[5]  J. Taylor,et al.  Computer discrimination between benign and malignant urothelial cells. , 1975, Acta cytologica.

[6]  J. Crawford Pathologic assessment of liver cell dysplasia and benign liver tumors: differentiation from malignant tumors. , 1990, Seminars in diagnostic pathology.

[7]  P H Bartels,et al.  Image analysis in quantitative cytopathology and histopathology. , 1989, Human pathology.

[8]  D. Weinberg,et al.  Nuclear grading of breast carcinoma by image analysis. Classification by multivariate and neural network analysis. , 1991, American journal of clinical pathology.

[9]  M. Roncalli,et al.  A morphometric study of liver cell dysplasia. , 1988, Human pathology.

[10]  C. Vogel,et al.  Liver cell dysplasia: a premalignant condition , 1973, Journal of clinical pathology.

[11]  P H Bartels,et al.  Automated prescreening of conventionally prepared cervical smears: a feasibility study. , 1992, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[12]  J. Baak,et al.  Discrimination of hyperplasia and carcinoma of the endometrium by quantitative microscopy–a feasibility study , 1981, Histopathology.

[13]  J W Bacus,et al.  Comparison of the Papanicolaou and Feulgen staining methods for DNA quantification by image analysis. , 1990, Cytometry.

[14]  G. Nguyen Fine-needle aspiration biopsy cytology of hepatic tumors in adults. , 1986, Pathology annual.

[15]  D. S. Coffey,et al.  Computerized image analysis of nuclear shape as a prognostic factor for prostatic cancer , 1982, The Prostate.

[16]  Berman Jj,et al.  Cirrhosis with atypia. A potential pitfall in the interpretation of liver aspirates. , 1988 .

[17]  Bell Da,et al.  Fine needle aspiration cytology of focal liver lesions. Results obtained with examination of both cytologic and histologic preparations. , 1986 .

[18]  G. Zampi,et al.  Morphological precursors of hepatocellular carcinoma: a morphometrical analysis. , 1987, Hepato-gastroenterology.

[19]  J. Baak,et al.  Quantitative, microscopical, computer‐aided diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma in individual patients , 1981, Histopathology.

[20]  E. Maiorano,et al.  Hepatocellular dysplasia: immunohistochemical and morphometrical evaluation. , 1988, Applied pathology.

[21]  R. Jagoe,et al.  Shape and texture analysis of liver cell nuclei in hepatomas by computer aided microscopy. , 1984, Journal of clinical pathology.

[22]  T. Kanematsu,et al.  DNA analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma and clinicopathologic implications , 1988, Cancer.

[23]  A. Marchevsky,et al.  Computerized interactive morphometry. An expert system for the diagnosis of lymphoid-rich effusions. , 1989, American journal of clinical pathology.

[24]  W. Evans,et al.  Cytologic diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma by fine‐needle aspiration biopsy , 1984, Cancer.

[25]  Mark S. Lifshitz,et al.  PAPNET™ Cytological Screening System , 1991 .

[26]  M. Ali,et al.  Morphologic spectrum of hepatocellular carcinoma in fine needle aspiration biopsies. , 1986, Acta cytologica.

[27]  M. Tatsuta,et al.  Cell features and patterns in fine‐needle aspirates of hepatocellular carcinoma , 1986, Cancer.

[28]  K. Okita,et al.  Morphologic studies of the liver cell dysplasia , 1983, Cancer.

[29]  J. Epstein,et al.  Nuclear roundness factor. A predictor of progression in untreated stage A2 prostate cancer , 1984, Cancer.

[30]  A. Landay,et al.  Advances in flow cytometry for diagnostic pathology. , 1994, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[31]  J. Baak,et al.  Quantitation of borderline and malignant mucinous ovarian tumours , 1981, Histopathology.