Using Bimodal Lognormal Functions to Describe Soil Hydraulic Properties

Accurate parameterization of the soil hydraulic properties represents a key issue for the modeling of soil water transport processes. Th e more complex the soil structure, the more crucial this requirement becomes. In dealing with this problem for structured and well-aggregated soils, we have pursued the general objective of developing hydraulic relationships whose parameters characterize the soil’s pore size distributions, thereby providing a physically based framework for the hydraulic relationships of bimodal soils. In our work, we assumed that the soil water retention function is determined by linear superposition of two distinct pore domains, which can be associated with textural and structural retention behaviors, respectively. Th e composite soil water retention function was described by Kosugi’s lognormal function, with parameters being directly associated with the mean and variance of the soil pore size distribution for each pore domain. Th e two components of soil water retention were linked by a weighting factor to which a physical meaning can also be given. An important and practical advantage of the proposed bimodal water retention function is that a closed-form analytical expression is obtained for the bimodal hydraulic conductivity function using pore size distribution parameters. Th is is relevant because we suggest that soil hydraulic properties can be characterized by the soil particle size distribution. Sensitivity analysis and comparisons with experimental data were used to evaluate the proposed bimodal lognormal hydraulic functions and to demonstrate their increased eff ectiveness in predicting the hydraulic conductivity characteristic of soils. Abbreviations: bHCF, bimodal hydraulic conductivity function; bWRF, bimodal water retention function; HCF, hydraulic conductivity function; PSD, pore size distribution; RMSD, root mean square deviation; vGM, van Genuchten–Mualem; WRF, water retention function.

[1]  G. Richard,et al.  The saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils with n-modal pore size distributions , 2009 .

[2]  Delwyn G. Fredlund,et al.  An equation to represent grain-size distribution , 2000 .

[3]  Teruhito Miyamoto,et al.  Soil Aggregate Structure Effects on Dielectric Permittivity of an Andisol Measured by Time Domain Reflectometry , 2003 .

[4]  Feike J. Leij,et al.  The RETC code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of unsaturated soils , 1992 .

[5]  Keith Smettem,et al.  Describing soil hydraulic properties with sums of simple functions , 1993 .

[6]  G. Kirchhof,et al.  Fitting performance of particle-size distribution models on data derived by conventional and laser diffraction techniques , 2009 .

[7]  J. Hopmans,et al.  Scaling soil water retention functions using particle-size distribution , 2009 .

[8]  D. Or,et al.  Evaporation and capillary coupling across vertical textural contrasts in porous media. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  B. Mohanty,et al.  New piecewise‐continuous hydraulic functions for modeling preferential flow in an intermittent‐flood‐irrigated field , 1997 .

[10]  Nunzio Romano,et al.  Spatial variability of the hydraulic properties of a volcanic soil , 1995 .

[11]  Marcel G. Schaap,et al.  Description of the unsaturated soil hydraulic database UNSODA version 2.0 , 2001 .

[12]  M. Kutílek Soil hydraulic properties as related to soil structure , 2004 .

[13]  Ole Wendroth,et al.  Reevaluation of the Evaporation Method for Determining Hydraulic Functions in Unsaturated Soils , 1993 .

[14]  Hans-Jörg Vogel,et al.  Validity limits for the van Genuchten–Mualem model and implications for parameter estimation and numerical simulation , 2006 .

[15]  Keith Smettem,et al.  Measuring the hydraulic properties of a stable aggregated soil , 1990 .

[16]  Erik H. D'Hollander,et al.  Estimation of the pore size distribution from the moisture characteristic , 1979 .

[17]  W. Durner Hydraulic conductivity estimation for soils with heterogeneous pore structure , 1994 .

[18]  Eckart Priesack,et al.  Closed‐Form Expression for the Multi‐Modal Unsaturated Conductivity Function , 2006 .

[19]  Bernd Diekkrüger,et al.  BIMODAL POROSITY AND UNSATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY , 1991 .

[20]  A. Coppola,et al.  A comparative analysis of the pore system in volcanic soils by means of water-retention measurements and image analysis , 2007 .

[21]  W. R. Gardner Representation of Soil Aggregate-Size Distribution by a Logarithmic-Normal Distribution1, 2 , 1956 .

[22]  Y. Mualem A New Model for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity , 1976 .

[23]  W. Durner,et al.  Simplified evaporation method for determining soil hydraulic properties: a reinvestigation of linearization errors , 2008 .

[24]  Nunzio Romano,et al.  Determining soil hydraulic functions from evaporation experiments by a parameter estimation Approach: Experimental verifications and numerical studies , 1999 .

[25]  Stephen R. Cattle,et al.  Linking hydraulic conductivity and tortuosity parameters to pore space geometry and pore-size distribution , 2003 .

[26]  Ken'ichirou Kosugi,et al.  Three‐parameter lognormal distribution model for soil water retention , 1994 .

[27]  D. Or,et al.  Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Structured Porous Media: A Review of Liquid Configuration–Based Models , 2002 .

[28]  Peter Lehmann,et al.  Unsaturated water flow across soil aggregate contacts , 2008 .

[29]  Wolfgang Durner,et al.  Determination of parameters for bimodal hydraulic functions by inverse modeling , 1998 .

[30]  D. Or,et al.  Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of structured porous media: A review of liquid configuration based models , 2002 .

[31]  G. Richard,et al.  Tillage of soils in relation to their bi-modal pore size distributions. , 2009 .

[32]  L. Jendele,et al.  Comparison of empirical, semi-empirical and physically based models of soil hydraulic functions derived for bi-modal soils. , 2009, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[33]  C. Bolster,et al.  On the significance of properly weighting sorption data for least squares analysis. , 2010 .

[34]  Marcel G. Schaap,et al.  Improved Prediction of Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity with the Mualem‐van Genuchten Model , 2000 .

[35]  Shmuel Assouline,et al.  Characteristic lengths affecting evaporative drying of porous media. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[36]  Susan E. Powers,et al.  Models for Estimating Soil Particle-Size Distributions , 2002 .

[37]  M. Th. van Genuchten,et al.  Effect of the shape of the soil hydraulic functions near saturation on variably-saturated flow predictions , 2000 .

[38]  R. Dahlgren,et al.  The Nature, Properties and Management of Volcanic Soils , 2004 .

[39]  D. R. Nielsen,et al.  Simultaneous scaling of soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity curves , 1992 .

[40]  K. J. Hollenbeck,et al.  RETMCL: incorporating maximum-likelihood estimation principles in the RETC soil hydraulic parameter estimation code , 2000 .