Using a Robust Active Appearance Model for Face Processing

Active Appearance Models are widely used to match statistical models of shape and appearance to new imagesrapidly. They work by finding model parameters whichminimise the sum of squares of residual differences between model and target image. A limitation of AAMs is that they are not robust to a large set of gross outliers. Using a robust kernel can help, but there are potential problems in determining the correct kernel scaling parameters. We describe a method of learning two sets of scaling parameters during AAM training: a coarse and a fine scale set. Our algorithm initially applies the coarse scale and then uses a form of deterministic annealing to reduce to the fine outlier rejection scaling as the AAM converges. The algorithm was assessed on two large datasets consisting of a set of faces, and a medical dataset of images of the spine. A significant improvement in accuracy and robustness was observed in cases which were difficult for a standard AAM.

[1]  Michael J. Black,et al.  A framework for the robust estimation of optical flow , 1993, 1993 (4th) International Conference on Computer Vision.

[2]  Stuart Geman,et al.  Statistical methods for tomographic image reconstruction , 1987 .

[3]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Robust anisotropic diffusion , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[4]  Michael J. Black,et al.  A Framework for Robust Subspace Learning , 2003, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[5]  Barry-John Theobald,et al.  Evaluating error functions for robust active appearance models , 2006, 7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FGR06).

[6]  Jiri Matas,et al.  XM2VTSDB: The Extended M2VTS Database , 1999 .

[7]  Michael J. Black,et al.  Eigentracking: Robust matching and tracking of objects using view - based representation , 1998 .

[8]  Ralph Gross,et al.  Constructing and Fitting Active Appearance Models With Occlusion , 2004, 2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop.

[9]  D. Ruppert Robust Statistics: The Approach Based on Influence Functions , 1987 .

[10]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Appearance Models , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Improving Appearance Model Matching Using Local Image Structure , 2003, IPMI.

[12]  Michael J. Black,et al.  EigenTracking: Robust Matching and Tracking of Articulated Objects Using a View-Based Representation , 1996, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[13]  C. Taylor,et al.  Diffeomorphic statistical shape models , 2008 .

[14]  Bjarne Kjær Ersbøll,et al.  Extending and Applying Active Appearance Models for Automated, High Precision Segmentation* , 2001 .

[15]  Martin Roberts,et al.  Vertebral Morphometry: Semiautomatic Determination of Detailed Shape From Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Images Using Active Appearance Models , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[16]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Improving the segmentaton of fractured vertebrae using dynamically sequenced active appearance models , 2006 .

[17]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  An Algorithm for Tuning an Active Appearance Model to New Data , 2006, BMVC.

[18]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Advances in active appearance models , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[19]  Roland Göcke,et al.  A Nonlinear Discriminative Approach to AAM Fitting , 2007, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.