Uncertainty in consumer decisions

Uncertainty has been identified as a major force shaping behaviour. The ubiquity of uncertainty in everyday choices is reflected in its prevalence in economic theories. Despite the acknowledged importance of uncertainty , however, the actual content of the concept is far from clear, for uncertainty has rarely been the focus of research. Presence of uncertainty has been used as a justification for the relevance of the study, rather than the object of the study in and of itself. In this paper, we have studied the presence of uncertainty in consumer decisions. Uncertainty has clearly a multidimensional nature and its dimensions have various effects on consumer behavior. To identify the central dimensions of uncertainty, we have adopted the idea from Herbert Simon who proposed a generalized approach to model a decision making as a process (Simon 1960). We propose that uncertainty has four dimensions in consumer decision context: knowledge uncertainty, evaluation uncertainty, choice uncertainty, and implementation uncertainty. Those dimensions can be clearly identified from our empirical data by using exploratory factor analysis. The questionnaire used in our empirical study can be used to measure uncertainty on each dimension. Against previous wisdom, evaluation and implementation uncertainties seem to exercise stronger impact on consumer decisions than the other varieties of uncertainty in electronic commerce context. Introduction Consumption involves decision making with what to buy, where to buy, and when to buy being the most obvious choices to be made. Often consumers face these decisions without being fully informed about the many aspects of the purchase. Indecision may exist over the best choice alternative. The needs and wants, the evaluation criteria, are often less than clear or they can't be directly matched with the characteristics of the available choice alternatives. The limits of one's knowledge about the products may be in doubt. In addition, one's ability to see the purchase through, to implement the purchase decision, is often indeterminate. Gaps in one's knowledge lead to feelings of insecurity, a mental state that is often termed uncertainty. Alba and Hutchinson (2000) note that " the correspondence between self-assessed and actual validity of knowledge is an important issue for the study of consumer decision making for high levels of correspondence are achieved rarely and moderate levels that include some degree of systematic bias UNCERTAINTY IN CONSUMER DECISIONS 2 All rights reserved. This study may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the author´s permission. …

[1]  I. Ajzen Residual Effects of Past on Later Behavior: Habituation and Reasoned Action Perspectives , 2002 .

[2]  C. Guo,et al.  A Review on Consumer External Search: Amount and Determinants , 2001 .

[3]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Knowledge Calibration: What Consumers Know and What They Think They Know , 2000 .

[4]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Frictionless Commerce? A Comparison of Internet and Conventional Retailers , 2000 .

[5]  Mary Ann Eastlick,et al.  Shopping Motives for Mail Catalog Shopping , 1999 .

[6]  B. Ratchford,et al.  Consumer information search revisited: Theory and empirical analysis , 1997 .

[7]  David L. Mothersbaugh,et al.  Consumer Knowledge Assessment , 1994 .

[8]  Mary Ann Eastlick,et al.  Gender differences in mail-catalog patronage motives , 1994 .

[9]  Peter R. Dickson,et al.  Buyer Uncertainty and Information Search , 1989 .

[10]  Joel E. Urbany An Experimental Examination of the Economics of Information , 1986 .

[11]  M. Brucks The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior , 1985 .

[12]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Compensatory Choice Models of Noncompensatory Processes: The Effect of Varying Context , 1984 .

[13]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Product familiarity and learning new information , 1984 .

[14]  C. W. Park,et al.  Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics , 1981 .

[15]  R. Hogarth,et al.  BEHAVIORAL DECISION THEORY: PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE , 1981 .

[16]  Gilbert A. Churchill A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[17]  J. P. Peter Reliability: A Review of Psychometric Basics and Recent Marketing Practices , 1979 .

[18]  L. Beach,et al.  A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies , 1978 .

[19]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[20]  J. Lanzetta,et al.  Effects of uncertainty and importance on information search in decision making. , 1968 .

[21]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[22]  L. A. Hausman How we Think , 1921 .

[23]  S. Dhami ECONOMICS OF INFORMATION , 2004 .

[24]  Anthony D. Miyazaki,et al.  The Relationship Between Knowledge and Search: It Depends , 1994 .

[25]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Decision Making under Ambiguity , 1986 .

[26]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[27]  O. J. Harvey Motivation and social interaction : cognitive determinants , 1963 .

[28]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The new science of management decision , 1960 .