Importance subsampling: improving power system planning under climate-based uncertainty

Recent studies indicate that the effects of inter-annual climate-based variability in power system planning are significant and that long samples of demand & weather data (spanning multiple decades) should be considered. At the same time, modelling renewable generation such as solar and wind requires high temporal resolution to capture fluctuations in output levels. In many realistic power system models, using long samples at high temporal resolution is computationally unfeasible. This paper introduces a novel subsampling approach, referred to as "importance subsampling", allowing the use of multiple decades of demand & weather data in power system planning models at reduced computational cost. The methodology can be applied in a wide class of optimisation-based power system simulations. A test case is performed on a model of the United Kingdom created using the open-source modelling framework Calliope and 36 years of hourly demand and wind data. Standard data reduction approaches such as using individual years or clustering into representative days lead to significant errors in estimates of optimal system design. Furthermore, the resultant power systems lead to supply capacity shortages, raising questions of generation capacity adequacy. In contrast, "importance subsampling" leads to accurate estimates of optimal system design at greatly reduced computational cost, with resultant power systems able to meet demand across all 36 years of demand & weather scenarios.

[1]  Erik Delarue,et al.  Integrating short term variations of the power system into integrated energy system models: A methodological review , 2017 .

[2]  Dirk J. Cannon,et al.  The Impact of Future Offshore Wind Farms on Wind Power Generation in Great Britain , 2015 .

[3]  Evelina Trutnevyte,et al.  Does cost optimization approximate the real-world energy transition? , 2016 .

[4]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Impact of different time series aggregation methods on optimal energy system design , 2017, ArXiv.

[5]  D. Berry,et al.  Electricity generation costs , 1954 .

[6]  Alastair R. Buckley,et al.  A review of energy systems models in the UK: Prevalent usage and categorisation , 2016 .

[7]  S. Pfenninger,et al.  Impacts of Inter-annual Wind and Solar Variations on the European Power System , 2018, Joule.

[8]  Iain Staffell,et al.  The increasing impact of weather on electricity supply and demand , 2018 .

[9]  T. Woollings Dynamical influences on European climate: an uncertain future , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  Dirk J. Cannon,et al.  Using reanalysis data to quantify extreme wind power generation statistics: A 33 year case study in Great Britain , 2015 .

[11]  M. A. Cameron,et al.  Low-cost solution to the grid reliability problem with 100% penetration of intermittent wind, water, and solar for all purposes , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Peter M. Haugan,et al.  A review of modelling tools for energy and electricity systems with large shares of variable renewables , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[13]  Mort D. Webster,et al.  Optimal Selection of Sample Weeks for Approximating the Net Load in Generation Planning Problems , 2013 .

[14]  Stefan Pfenninger,et al.  Dealing with multiple decades of hourly wind and PV time series in energy models: A comparison of methods to reduce time resolution and the planning implications of inter-annual variability , 2017 .

[15]  S. Schubert,et al.  MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications , 2011 .

[16]  Simon Hilpert,et al.  The Open Energy Modelling Framework (oemof) - A novel approach in energy system modelling , 2017 .

[17]  M. Ventosa,et al.  Electricity market modeling trends , 2005 .

[18]  Dirk Witthaut,et al.  Natural wind variability triggered drop in German redispatch volume and costs from 2015 to 2016 , 2018, PloS one.

[19]  Roy Jensen,et al.  Power System Economics , 1983 .

[20]  William D'haeseleer,et al.  Determining optimal electricity technology mix with high level of wind power penetration , 2011 .

[21]  Adam A. Scaife,et al.  The relationship between wind power, electricity demand and winter weather patterns in Great Britain , 2017 .

[22]  Magnus Korpås,et al.  Assessing the impact of sampling and clustering techniques on offshore grid expansion planning , 2017 .

[23]  William D'haeseleer,et al.  Impact of the level of temporal and operational detail in energy-system planning models , 2016 .

[24]  Iain Staffell,et al.  Measuring the progress and impacts of decarbonising British electricity , 2017 .

[25]  L. Shaffrey,et al.  Quantifying the increasing sensitivity of power systems to climate variability , 2016 .

[26]  Stefan Pfenninger,et al.  Calliope: a multi-scale energy systems modelling framework , 2018, J. Open Source Softw..

[27]  Iain Staffell,et al.  The importance of open data and software: Is energy research lagging behind? , 2017 .

[28]  Aqeel Ahmed Bazmi,et al.  Sustainable energy systems: Role of optimization modeling techniques in power generation and supply—A review , 2011 .

[29]  Xiaoping Zhou,et al.  Global warming of 1.5°C: Summary for policy makers , 2018 .

[30]  Lion Hirth,et al.  Carpe diem: A novel approach to select representative days for long-term power system modeling , 2016 .

[31]  Birgit Fais,et al.  Designing low-carbon power systems for Great Britain in 2050 that are robust to the spatiotemporal and inter-annual variability of weather , 2018 .

[32]  Erik Delarue,et al.  Selecting Representative Days for Capturing the Implications of Integrating Intermittent Renewables in Generation Expansion Planning Problems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.