Regulatory Focus, Regulatory Fit, and the Search and Consideration of Choice Alternatives

This research investigates the effects of regulatory focus on alternative search and consideration set formation in consumer decision making. Results from three experiments yield two primary findings. First, promotion-focused consumers tend to search for alternatives at a more global level, whereas prevention-focused consumers tend to search for alternatives at a more local level. Second, promotion-focused consumers tend to have larger consideration sets than do prevention-focused consumers. Building on these two primary findings, it is additionally shown that whereas promotion-focused consumers attach relatively greater value to options chosen from hierarchically structured sets, prevention-focused consumers attach relatively greater value to options chosen from nonhierarchically structured item lists. Finally, whereas promotion-focused consumers attach significantly greater value to options chosen from larger sets than to options chosen from smaller sets, prevention-focused consumers do not attach significantly less value to options chosen from larger sets than to options chosen from smaller sets. (c) 2010 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc..

[1]  Michaela Wänke The Persuasive Power of Regulatory Fit , 2008 .

[2]  Michel Tuan Pham,et al.  Ideals and Oughts and the Reliance of Affect Versus Substance in Persuasion , 2004 .

[3]  G. Haynes,et al.  Testing the boundaries of the choice overload phenomenon: The effect of number of options and time pressure on decision difficulty and satisfaction , 2009 .

[4]  E. Higgins,et al.  Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[5]  E. Higgins,et al.  Transfer of value from fit. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Jaideep Sengupta,et al.  Understanding Impulsive Eaters' Choice Behaviors: The Motivational Influences of Regulatory Focus , 2007 .

[7]  Malte Friese,et al.  Regulatory focus and reliance on implicit preferences in consumption contexts , 2010 .

[8]  Brian Sternthal,et al.  Value from Regulatory Construal Fit: The Persuasive Impact of Fit between Consumer Goals and Message Concreteness , 2010 .

[9]  Alexander Chernev,et al.  Goal Orientation and Consumer Preference for the Status Quo , 2004 .

[10]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Construction of Preference: When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2006 .

[11]  E. Higgins Making a good decision: value from fit. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[12]  Jens Förster,et al.  Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns? , 2003 .

[13]  E. Higgins,et al.  Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: distinct self-regulatory systems. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  J. Förster How Body Feedback Influences Consumers’ Evaluation of Products , 2004 .

[15]  N Liberman,et al.  Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: implications for attributional functions. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Elena Reutskaja,et al.  Satisfaction in Choice as a Function of the Number of Alternatives: When Goods Satiate But Bads Escalate , 2005 .

[17]  U. Hoffrage,et al.  Testing the tyranny of too much choice against the allure of more choice , 2009 .

[18]  John Aitchison,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data , 1986 .

[19]  Abigail A. Scholer,et al.  Engaging the Consumer: The Science and Art of the Value Creation Process , 2009 .

[20]  Michel Tuan Pham,et al.  Rethinking Regulatory Engagement Theory , 2009 .

[21]  Amna Kirmani,et al.  Vigilant against Manipulation: The Effect of Regulatory Focus on the Use of Persuasion Knowledge , 2007 .

[22]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations : Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making , 1997 .

[23]  Gün R Semin,et al.  Linguistic signatures of regulatory focus: how abstraction fits promotion more than prevention. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from "Feeling Right.". , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  J. Brockner,et al.  Value from hedonic experience and engagement. , 2006, Psychological review.

[26]  Michel Tuan Pham,et al.  Promotion and Prevention in Consumer Decision Making: State of the Art and Theoretical Propositions , 2005 .

[27]  Louise M. Hassan,et al.  Tobacco consumption in the home: impact on social relationships and marking territory , 2010 .

[28]  B. Kahn,et al.  The Influence of Assortment Structure on Perceived Variety and Consumption Quantities , 2004 .

[29]  Michel Tuan Pham,et al.  Contingent Reliance on the Affect Heuristic as a Function of Regulatory Focus , 2008 .

[30]  Jennifer Aaker,et al.  “I” Seek Pleasures and “We” Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion , 2001 .

[31]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  How Regulatory Fit Affects Value in Consumer Choices and Opinions , 2006 .

[32]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Consideration set influences on consumer decision-making and choice: Issues, models, and suggestions , 1991 .

[33]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets , 1990 .

[34]  E Tory Higgins,et al.  Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: what feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Buyers versus Sellers: How They Differ in Their Responses to Framed Outcomes , 2005 .

[36]  P. Todd,et al.  Can There Ever Be Too Many Options? A Meta-Analytic Review of Choice Overload , 2010 .

[37]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  Locomotion, Assessment, and Regulatory Fit: Value Transfer from 'How' to 'What' , 2003 .

[38]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Satisfaction in choice as a function of the number of alternatives: When “goods satiate” , 2009 .

[39]  Jens Förster,et al.  How Global Versus Local Perception Fits Regulatory Focus , 2005, Psychological science.

[40]  N Liberman,et al.  Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  Rongrong Zhou,et al.  Promotion and Prevention Across Mental Accounts: When Financial Products Dictate Consumers' Investment Goals , 2004 .