International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature (ICPN) 2.0.

BACKGROUND Opal phytoliths (microscopic silica bodies produced in and between the cells of many plants) are a very resilient, often preserved type of plant microfossil. With the exponentially growing number of phytolith studies, standardization of phytolith morphotype names and description is essential. As a first effort in standardization, the International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature 1.0 was published by the ICPN Working Group in Annals of Botany in 2005. A decade of use of the code has prompted the need to revise, update, expand and improve it. SCOPE ICPN 2.0 formulates the principles recommended for naming and describing phytolith morphotypes. According to these principles, it presents the revised names, diagnosis, images and drawings of the morphotypes that were included in ICPN 1.0, plus three others. These 19 morphotypes are those most commonly encountered in phytolith assemblages from modern and fossil soils, sediments and archaeological deposits. An illustrated glossary of common terms for description is also provided.

[1]  Xavier Turon,et al.  Siliceous spicules and skeleton frameworks in sponges: Origin, diversity, ultrastructural patterns, and biological functions , 2003, Microscopy research and technique.

[2]  C. Strömberg.  Decoupled taxonomic radiation and ecological expansion of open-habitat grasses in the Cenozoic of North America. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Identification of a morphotype association of Phoenix dactylifera L. lignified tissues origin at ed-Dur (1st AD), Umm al-Qaiwain (U.A.E.). , 2001 .

[4]  M. Bamford,et al.  Palaeoecological significance of palms at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, based on phytolith remains , 2009 .

[5]  Morphological characterisation of silica phytoliths in Neotropical Marantaceae leaves , 2013, Plant Systematics and Evolution.

[6]  S. Bozarth.  Classification of Opal Phytoliths Formed in Selected Dicotyledons Native to the Great Plains , 1992 .

[7]  R. Bonnefille,et al.  Comparative study of modern phytolith assemblages from inter-tropical Africa , 2007 .

[8]  A. Lézine,et al.  Phytoliths: indicators of grassland dynamics during the late Holocene in intertropical Africa , 1997 .

[9]  Thomas C. Hart,et al.  Issues and directions in phytolith analysis , 2016 .

[10]  J. W. Geis.  Biogenic Silica in Selected Species of Deciduous Angiosperms , 1973 .

[11]  C. W. Childs,et al.  Opal phytoliths of New Zealand , 1994 .

[12]  R. Bonnefille,et al.  Phytoliths as paleoenvironmental indicators, West Side Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia , 1999 .

[13]  L. Raz,et al.  Phytoliths as a tool for archaeobotanical, palaeobotanical and palaeoecological studies in Amazonian palms , 2016 .

[14]  S. Knapp.  What's in a name? , 2000, Nature.

[15]  C. R. Metcalfe.  Anatomy of the monocotyledons , 1960 .

[16]  Hetty Bertoldi de Pomar.  ENSAYO DE CLASIFICACION MORFOLOGICA DE LOS SILICOFITOLITOS , 2013 .

[17]  J. Smol,et al.  Atlas of Chrysophycean Cysts , 1994, Developments in Hydrobiology.

[18]  E. Segnit,et al.  Silica in Woody Stems , 1974 .

[19]  A Alexandre,et al.  International code for phytolith nomenclature 1.0. , 2005, Annals of botany.

[20]  Deborah M. Pearsall,et al.  Developing a Phytolith Classification System , 1992 .

[21]  J. Guiot,et al.  Definition of grassland biomes from phytoliths in West Africa , 2008 .

[22]  F. Runge.  The opal phytolith inventory of soils in central Africa —quantities, shapes, classification, and spectra , 1999 .

[23]  G. Fredlund,et al.  Modern phytolith assemblages from the North American Great Plains , 1994 .

[24]  K. Neumann,et al.  Wood and bark phytoliths of West African woody plants , 2017 .

[25]  D. Paula,et al.  Silica grains in woody plants of the neotropics , especially Surinam , 2022 .

[26]  Dwight A. Brown.  Prospects and limits of a phytolith key for grasses in the central United States , 1984 .

[27]  C. Strömberg.  Using phytolith assemblages to reconstruct the origin and spread of grass-dominated habitats in the great plains of North America during the late Eocene to early Miocene , 2004 .

[28]  Jammi L. Ladwig,et al.  Morphometric analysis of phytoliths: recommendations towards standardization from the International Committee for Phytolith Morphometrics , 2016 .

[29]  B. Eichhorn,et al.  Seed phytoliths in West African Commelinaceae and their potential for palaeoecological studies , 2010 .

[30]  C. Lentfer,et al.  A Universal phytolith key , 2001 .

[31]  Rosa M. Albert,et al.  PhytCore ODB: A new tool to improve efficiency in the management and exchange of information on phytoliths , 2016 .

[32]  Selena Y. Smith,et al.  Phytolith variability in Zingiberales: A tool for the reconstruction of past tropical vegetation , 2013 .

[33]  C. Cleal,et al.  Botanical Nomenclature and Plant Fossils , 2010 .

[34]  M. Bamford,et al.  Plio–Pleistocene macroplant fossil remains and phytoliths from Lowermost Bed II in the eastern palaeolake margin of Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania , 2006 .

[35]  H. Joosten,et al.  What’s in a name?: Some thoughts on pollen classification, identification, and nomenclature in Quaternary palynology , 2002 .

[36]  Christelle Hély,et al.  A phytolith index as a proxy of tree cover density in tropical areas: Calibration with Leaf Area Index along a forest-savanna transect in southeastern Cameroon , 2005 .

[37]  A. Ollendorf.  Toward a Classification Scheme of Sedge (Cyperaceae) Phytoliths , 1992 .

[38]  C. Strömberg,et al.  Phytoliths in Paleoecology: Analytical Considerations, Current Use, and Future Directions , 2018 .

[39]  M. Kohn,et al.  Decoupling the spread of grasslands from the evolution of grazer-type herbivores in South America , 2013, Nature Communications.

[40]  C. Lentfer,et al.  Palm reading: A pilot study to discriminate phytoliths of four Arecaceae (Palmae) taxa , 2011 .

[41]  L. Vrydaghs,et al.  Phytoliths in archaeology: recent advances , 2016, Vegetation History and Archaeobotany.

[42]  A. Ballouche,et al.  The Early Holocene palaeoenvironment of Ounjougou (Mali) : Phytoliths in a multiproxy context , 2009 .

[43]  Dolores R. Piperno,et al.  Phytolith analysis : an archaeological and geological perspective , 1990 .

[44]  M. Łukowiak.  Fossil and modern sponge fauna of southern Australia and adjacent regions compared: interpretation, evolutionary and biogeographic significance of the late Eocene ‘soft’ sponges , 2016 .

[45]  Lynley A. Wallis.  An overview of leaf phytolith production patterns in selected northwest Australian flora , 2003 .

[46]  Doreen Bowdery.  An enigma revisited: identification of palm phytoliths extracted from the 1983 Rapa Nui, Rano Kao2 core , 2015, Vegetation History and Archaeobotany.

[47]  C. McMichael,et al.  Palm Phytoliths of Mid-Elevation Andean Forests , 2018, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[48]  M. Osterrieth,et al.  Differentiation of globular phytoliths in Arecaceae and other monocotyledons: morphological description for paleobotanical application , 2015 .

[49]  P. Kirk,et al.  International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code) , 2012 .

[50]  C. Favier,et al.  Past tree cover of the Congo Basin recovered by phytoliths and δ 13 C along soil profiles , 2017 .

[51]  J. Iriarte,et al.  Phytolith analysis of selected native plants and modern soils from southeastern Uruguay and its implications for paleoenvironmental and archeological reconstruction , 2009 .