Experimental testing for metrological traceability and accuracy of liquid microflows and microfluidics

Abstract Micro-flows are growing more important and useful for a wide variety of scientific and engineering fields such as bioanalysis, drug development and administration, Organ-on-a-Chip, etc, but accurate and reliable measurements traceable to the International System of Units can be challenging in micro-to-femto flow operating ranges. In this paper a gravimetric method has been used to quantify the measurement error of the volumetric flow rate of water from 1000 μL/h to 1 μL/h delivered by a syringe pump in different experimental conditions that replicate the current microfluidics setups. Several sources of error have been determined such as the mass measurement, the fluid evaporation dependent on the gravimetric methodology implemented and the repeatability, believed to be closely related to the operating mode of the stepper motor and drive screw pitch of the syringe pump. The elastic deformability of the medical grade 1 mL polypropylene syringes commonly used in micro-flows has greatly affected the volumetric flow rate, unlike the glass syringes tested. Finally, testing the gravimetric method while adding PDMS microfluidic channels to the flow circuit served to demonstrate that material, dimensions and shape of the microchannels did not show significant influence on the volumetric flow rate error for the flow rates imposed, important to establish well defined methodologies for microfluidics.

[1]  Laura Campo-Deaño Fluid-Flow Characterization in Microfluidics , 2018 .

[2]  Vania Silverio,et al.  Challenges and trends in magnetic sensor integration with microfluidics for biomedical applications , 2017 .

[3]  Eduarda Filipe,et al.  UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION IN GRAVIMETRIC MICROFLOW MEASUREMENTS , 2015 .

[4]  Matthew R Moore,et al.  A metering rotary nanopump for microfluidic systems. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[5]  R. Snijder,et al.  Assessment of drug delivery devices , 2015, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[6]  Ana V. Silva,et al.  Dark matters: black-PDMS nanocomposite for opaque microfluidic systems. , 2019, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[7]  M. Madou Fundamentals of microfabrication : the science of miniaturization , 2002 .

[8]  S. Freitas,et al.  Microfabrication Techniques for Microfluidic Devices , 2018 .

[9]  N Bignell,et al.  Recommended table for the density of water between 0 ?C and 40 ?C based on recent experimental reports , 2001 .

[10]  Peter Lucas,et al.  Comparison of infusion pumps calibration methods , 2017 .

[11]  Peter Lucas,et al.  Metrology for drug delivery , 2015, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[12]  Peter Lucas,et al.  Uncertainty calculation in the calibration of an infusion pump using the comparison method , 2018 .

[13]  K. Foster,et al.  Microfluidics with fluid walls , 2017, Nature Communications.

[14]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  30 years of microfluidics , 2019, Micro and Nano Engineering.

[15]  A. Fleischman,et al.  A System for Micro/Nano Fluidic Flow Diagnostics , 2005, Biomedical microdevices.

[16]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Flexible Methods for Microfluidics , 2001 .

[17]  Jeremiah J. Zartman,et al.  Microfluidic device design, fabrication, and testing protocols , 2015 .

[18]  Rui Martins,et al.  Primary standards for measuring flow rates from 100 nl/min to 1 ml/min – gravimetric principle , 2015, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.