Vulnerability of nearshore tropical finfish in Cuba: implications for scientific and management planning

Coastal areas of Cuba harbor rich biodiversity that provide a variety of important ecosystem services, including fisheries production. High-value invertebrate fisheries in Cuba are managed on the basis of scientific assessments, but comparable data and analyses are lacking for the much larger number of exploited finfish species. However, dramatic declines in finfish catch despite minimal management restrictions suggests resource depletion, and the need for scientific and management attention. To prioritize finfish for such attention, we conducted productivity-susceptibility analyses (PSA) for 34 species within each of Cuba's four fishery management zones. The resulting 136 estimates of vulnerability to overfishing revealed few differences in species-specific scores among zones, despite ecological and socioeconomic heterogeneity along the Cuban coast. Vulnerability scores were generally low, although this relative metric does not necessarily mean that overfishing has not occurred. Spatial differences in catch composition relative to the vulnerability scores underscore potential differences in socioeconomic vulnerability of fishing communities based upon their reliance on different species. Therefore, our PSA results should be used to prioritize research, monitoring, and stock assessment efforts, as well as management actions, within each fishing zone to conserve locally important resources, recover those that are depleted, sustainably develop those that are underutilized, and promote ecological and socioeconomic stability across Cuba as it confronts the challenges of a changing world.

[1]  D. Brewer,et al.  Sustainability of fishery bycatch: a process for assessing highly diverse and numerous bycatch , 2001, Environmental Conservation.

[2]  Daniel Pauly,et al.  Fisheries: Does catch reflect abundance? , 2013, Nature.

[3]  Nicolás L. Gutiérrez,et al.  Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries , 2011, Nature.

[4]  Kelly L. Ames,et al.  An Approach to Defining Stock Complexes for U.S. West Coast Groundfishes Using Vulnerabilities and Ecological Distributions , 2011 .

[5]  Sale,et al.  1 Ecosystem-based management of coral reefs and interconnected nearshore tropical habitats , 2013 .

[6]  D. Au,et al.  Shark Productivity and Reproductive Protection, and a Comparison with Teleosts , 2009 .

[7]  John McKenna,et al.  Socio-economic data in coastal vulnerability indices: constraints and opportunities , 2002, Journal of Coastal Research.

[8]  W. Patrick,et al.  Examining the 10-Year Rebuilding Dilemma for U.S. Fish Stocks , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  P. Mace,et al.  Relationships between Common Biological Reference Points Used as Thresholds and Targets of Fisheries Management Strategies , 1994 .

[10]  Owen Liu,et al.  Fishery Management Strategies for Addressing Complex Spatial Structure in Marine Fish Stocks , 2014 .

[11]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Status and Solutions for the World’s Unassessed Fisheries , 2012, Science.

[12]  R. Martínez,et al.  Comparación entre dos modelos estructurados por edades, aplicados a la pesquería de langosta, Panulirus Argus (Latreille, 1804), en la región suroriental de Cuba , 2012 .

[13]  D. Milton Assessing the susceptibility to fishing of populations of rare trawl bycatch : sea snakes caught by Australia's Northern Prawn Fishery , 2001 .

[14]  Ray Hilborn,et al.  Global fishery prospects under contrasting management regimes , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  J. Lubchenco,et al.  Solutions for Recovering and Sustaining the Bounty of the Ocean Combining Fishery Reforms, Rights-Based Fisheries Management, and Marine Reserves , 2015 .

[16]  J. Baisre,et al.  Going against the flow: Effects of river damming in Cuban fisheries , 2006 .

[17]  Jeremy D. Prince,et al.  The barefoot ecologist goes fishing , 2003 .

[18]  K. Honey From Rags to Fishes : Data-Poor Methods for Fishery Managers , 2010 .

[19]  Laurence Smith,et al.  The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[20]  P. Spencer,et al.  An assessment of vulnerability in Alaska groundfish , 2011 .

[21]  Rafael Puga,et al.  Integrating Anthropogenic and Climatic Factors in the Assessment of the Caribbean Spiny Lobster ( Panulirus argus ) in Cuba: Implications for Fishery Management , 2013 .

[22]  J. Baisre Chronicle of Cuban Marine Fisheries (1935-1995): Trend Analysis and Fisheries Potential , 2000 .

[23]  T. Essington,et al.  Fishing through marine food webs. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  S. Murawski Can We Manage Our Multispecies Fisheries , 1991 .

[25]  D. Au,et al.  New abbreviated calculation for measuring intrinsic rebound potential in exploited fish populations — example for sharks , 2015 .

[26]  Are the Ugly Truths Not Ugly Enough , 2009 .

[27]  Y. S. D. Mitcheson,et al.  Historical analysis of Cuban commercial fishing effort and the effects of management interventions on important reef fishes from 1960-2005 , 2009 .

[28]  Rafael Puga,et al.  Bioeconomic modelling and risk assessment of the Cuban fishery for spiny lobster Panulirus argus , 2005 .

[29]  Cody S. Szuwalski,et al.  An Evaluation of Harvest Control Methods for Fishery Management , 2016 .

[30]  M. E. Conners,et al.  Managing non‐target, data‐poor species using catch limits: lessons from the Alaskan groundfish fishery , 2010 .