A systematic review on the validity and reliability of tape measurement method in leg length discrepancy

Background: Leg length discrepancy measurement is an essential part of musculoskeletal clinical assessment, and tape measurement is a common clinical method. This study aimed to systematically review the results of the findings of studies on validity and reliability of the tape measurement method and the quality of reporting the literature on this topic. Methods: A search was performed in PubMed, EBSCO, Science Direct, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar using selected keywords from inception to December 2017.This systematic review was based on the PRISMA guideline. After a systematic selection process, the quality of the included studies was assessed independently by 2 reviewers using the Brink and Louw Scale for quality assessment. Results: A total of 11 studies were finally considered for this systematic review. Two studies were about the validity of (a measurement tool) studies and 4 were reliability analysis only. Validity and reliability analyses were simultaneously applied to 5 studies. Also, 9 out of 11 studies were deemed to be of high quality based on Brink and Louw Scale. Studies showed high (ICC=0.7) to very high (ICC=0.9) levels of interrater and intrarater reliability. The validity of the methods ranged from low to very high depending on subjects. Conclusion: Tape measurement method has acceptable reliability and validity in healthy people, but it does not have acceptable validity in measuring obese people and patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Thus, using a suitable method for LLD leg length discrepancy measurement seems to be necessary for obese and individuals with leg length discrepancy.

[1]  K. Refshauge,et al.  Non-radiographic methods of measuring global sagittal balance: a systematic review , 2017, Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders.

[2]  J. Kopec,et al.  Comparison of Lifts Versus Tape Measure in Determining Leg Length Discrepancy , 2014, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[3]  H. Wallmann,et al.  Validity of measuring leg length with a tape measure compared to a computed tomography scan , 2013, Physiotherapy theory and practice.

[4]  S. Milosavljevic,et al.  Validity and reliability of palpation-digitization for non-invasive kinematic measurement - a systematic review. , 2013, Manual therapy.

[5]  Q. Louw,et al.  Clinical instruments: reliability and validity critical appraisal. , 2012, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[6]  M. McHugh.  Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic , 2012, Biochemia medica.

[7]  A. R. Sulaiman,et al.  Reliability and accuracy of the tape measurement method with a nearest reading of 5 mm in the assessment of leg length discrepancy. , 2011, Singapore medical journal.

[8]  A. P. Simão,et al.  analysis of intra-ExaminEr rEliability of thE tapE mEthod mEasurE to lEg lEngth discrEpancy , 2009 .

[9]  John S. Leard,et al.  Intrarater and interrater reliability of 22 clinical measures associated with lower quarter malalignment. , 2009, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[10]  Sanjeev Sabharwal,et al.  Methods for Assessing Leg Length Discrepancy , 2008, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  G. A. Knutson,et al.  Anatomic and functional leg-length inequality: A review and recommendation for clinical decision-making. Part I, anatomic leg-length inequality: prevalence, magnitude, effects and clinical significance , 2005, Chiropractic & osteopathy.

[12]  I. Harris,et al.  ASSESSING LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY AFTER FEMORAL FRACTURE: CLINICAL EXAMINATION OR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY? , 2005, ANZ journal of surgery.

[13]  R. Marx,et al.  Measurement Variance in Limb Length Discrepancy: Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability , 2005, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[14]  M. T. Gross,et al.  Limb length inequality: clinical implications for assessment and intervention. , 2003, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[15]  B. Gurney.  Leg length discrepancy. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[16]  K. George,et al.  The reliability and validity of the ‘Tape’ and ‘Block’ methods for assessing anatomical leg-length discrepancy☆☆☆★★★ , 2000 .

[17]  Gail D. Wegner.  Statistical Methods for Health Care Research , 1995 .

[18]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Intraexaminer, interexaminer, and interdevice comparability of leg length measurements obtained with measuring tape and metrecom. , 1991, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[19]  D. Riddle,et al.  Validity of derived measurements of leg-length differences obtained by use of a tape measure. , 1990, Physical therapy.

[20]  P. Gogia,et al.  Validity and reliability of leg length measurements. , 1986, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[21]  S. Binder-Macleod,et al.  Leg length discrepancy assessment: accuracv and precision in five clinical methods of evaluation*. , 1984, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[22]  B. Swierstra,et al.  Measurement of limb length inequality. Comparison of clinical methods with orthoradiography in 190 children. , 1996, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[23]  M. Nurminen,et al.  Accuracy and precision of clinical estimation of leg length inequality and lumbar scoliosis: comparison of clinical and radiological measurements. , 1988, International disability studies.